Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

Engaging absentee landowners in conservation practice decisions: A descriptive study of an understudied group

Peggy Petrzelka, Tom Buman and Jamie Ridgely
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2009, 64 (3) 94A-99A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.64.3.94A
Peggy Petrzelka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Buman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie Ridgely
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

Nonpoint source pollution is the primary pollution threat facing water quality in the Great Lakes Basin (Great Lakes Commission n.d.). Protection and preservation of water quality in the Basin, as well as elsewhere, hinges on the ability of local conservation agencies to effectively contact, assist, and convince landowners to personally undertake and participate in local, state, and federal sponsored conservation initiatives. However, nearly half (48%) of landowners in the Basin do not operate the agricultural land they own (Census of Agriculture 1999). In addition, it is unknown how many of these landowners are aware of or receiving any information about the conservation practices and resources available to them through public sponsored programs. Therefore, it is difficult to gauge the “average” level of knowledge these landowners have regarding educational, technical, and financial assistance for conservation implementation.

Agricultural census data comparing enrollment in the Conservation Reserve (CRP) and Wetland Reserve (WRP) programs suggest a need for specialized outreach to landowners not operating their land. Nationwide, these landowners lag owner-operator enrollment in both CRP and WRP by 64%. In the Great Lakes region, owner-operators are one and one-half times more likely to enroll land in these programs than their nonoperator landowner counterparts (Census…

Footnotes

  • Peggy Petrzelka is an associate professor of Sociology at Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Tom Buman is president and Jamie Ridgely is project manager at Agren Inc., Carroll, Iowa.

  • © 2009 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 64 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 64, Issue 3
May/June 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Engaging absentee landowners in conservation practice decisions: A descriptive study of an understudied group
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Engaging absentee landowners in conservation practice decisions: A descriptive study of an understudied group
Peggy Petrzelka, Tom Buman, Jamie Ridgely
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2009, 64 (3) 94A-99A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.64.3.94A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Engaging absentee landowners in conservation practice decisions: A descriptive study of an understudied group
Peggy Petrzelka, Tom Buman, Jamie Ridgely
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2009, 64 (3) 94A-99A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.64.3.94A
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Rented farmland: A missing piece of the nutrient management puzzle in the Upper Mississippi River Basin?
  • Perceptions and use of cover crops among early adopters: Findings from a national survey
  • Comparing different types of rural landowners: Implications for conservation practice adoption
  • Iowa farmers' responses to transformative scenarios for Corn Belt agriculture
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Global connections: A case for international perspectives
  • Climate and pest interactions pose a cross-landscape management challenge to soil and water conservation
  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society