Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Pasture monitoring at a farm scale with the USDA NRCS pasture condition score system

M.A. Sanderson, S.C. Goslee, J. Gonet and R. Stout
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2009, 64 (6) 423-433; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.64.6.423
M.A. Sanderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.C. Goslee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Gonet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Stout
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Pasture Condition Score (PCS) system, developed by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, is a monitoring and assessment tool for pastureland enrolled in conservation programs. Ten indicators of vegetation and soil status are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and are summed to give an aggregate score, which is interpreted for management recommendations. Information is lacking, however, on how PCS results vary within and among environments and farms. We applied the PCS on two farms in Pennsylvania (one dairy, one beef), two dairy farms in New York, and an organic dairy in Maryland. All pastures (25 to 63 per farm) on each farm were evaluated according to PCS methodology in spring, summer, and autumn of 2004, 2005, and 2006. Aggregate PCS scores ranged from 30 to 40 (indicating some improvements were needed to pasture management) and were relatively stable within management recommendation categories across seasons in 2004 and 2006. The PCS scores in 2005, however, plummeted (below 25 to 30—indicating major management changes to prevent degradation) on the Pennsylvania and Maryland farms because of drought. Pastures used for heifers and dry cows or as wintering areas often had lower scores than other pastures. Typically, these pastures were on less productive soils, steep slopes, and were stocked intensively. There was much overlap among individual score categories for some indicators, which suggests that fewer but broader score categories (e.g., low, medium, high) would simplify the system for farmers. The monitoring workload could be reduced by assessing representative subsets of pastures managed similarly or in similar landscape positions instead of all pastures on a farm.

Footnotes

  • Matt A. Sanderson is a research agronomist, Sarah C. Goslee is a research ecologist, and Jeff Gonet and Robert Stout are support scientists at the USDA Agricultural Research Service Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Curtin Road, University Park, Pennsylvania.

  • © 2009 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 64 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 64, Issue 6
November/December 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pasture monitoring at a farm scale with the USDA NRCS pasture condition score system
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pasture monitoring at a farm scale with the USDA NRCS pasture condition score system
M.A. Sanderson, S.C. Goslee, J. Gonet, R. Stout
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2009, 64 (6) 423-433; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.64.6.423

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Pasture monitoring at a farm scale with the USDA NRCS pasture condition score system
M.A. Sanderson, S.C. Goslee, J. Gonet, R. Stout
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2009, 64 (6) 423-433; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.64.6.423
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Understanding the use of decision support tools by conservation professionals and their education and training needs: An application of the Reasoned Action Approach
  • An integrated grazingland assessment approach for range and pasturelands
  • An integrated approach to grazingland ecological assessments and management interpretations
  • Pastureland Conservation Effects Assessment Project: Status and expected outcomes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework toolbox in a Southern Piedmont landscape of the United States
  • Soil erodibility after the removal of wood chip mulch: A wind tunnel experiment
  • Environmental impact of the historical slag pile at Davenport, Iowa, United States: Trace metal contamination in soils and terrestrial vegetation
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society