Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Livestock grazing and vegetative filter strip buffer effects on runoff sediment, nitrate, and phosphorus losses

D.F. Webber, S.K. Mickelson, S.I. Ahmed, J.R. Russell, W.J. Powers, R.C. Schultz and J.L. Kovar
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2010, 65 (1) 34-41; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.1.34
D.F. Webber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.K. Mickelson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.I. Ahmed
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.R. Russell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.J. Powers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.C. Schultz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Kovar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Livestock grazing in the Midwestern United States can result in significant levels of runoff sediment and nutrient losses to surface water resources. Some of these contaminants can increase stream eutrophication and are suspected of contributing to hypoxic conditions in the Gulf of Mexico. This research quantified effects of livestock grazing management practices and vegetative filter strip buffers on runoff depth and mass losses of total solids, nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), and ortho-phosphorus (PO4-P) under natural hydrologic conditions. Runoff data were collected from 12 rainfall events during 2001 to 2003 at an Iowa State University research farm in central Iowa, United States. Three vegetative buffers (paddock area:vegetative buffer area ratios of 1:0.2, 1:0.1, and 1:0 no buffer [control]) and three grazing management practices (continuous, rotational, and no grazing [control]) comprised nine treatment combinations (vegetative buffer ratio/grazing management practice) replicated in three 1.35 ha (3.34 ac) plot areas. The total 4.05 ha (10.02 ac) study area also included nine 0.4 ha (1.0 ac) paddocks and 27 vegetative buffer runoff collection units distributed in a randomized complete block design. The study site was established on uneven terrain with a maximum of 15% slopes and consisted of approximately 100% cool-season smooth bromegrass. Average paddock and vegetative buffer plant tiller densities estimated during the 2003 project season were approximately 62 million and 93 million tillers ha−1 (153 million and 230 million tillers ac−1), respectively. Runoff sample collection pipe leakage discovered and corrected during 2001 possibly reduced runoff depth and affected runoff contaminant mass losses data values. Consequently, 2001 runoff analysis results were limited to treatment comparisons within the 2001 season and were not compared with 2002 and 2003 data. Analysis results from 2001 showed no significant differences in average losses of runoff, total solids, NO3-N, and PO4-P among the nine vegetative buffer/grazing practice treatment combinations. Results from 2002 indicated significantly higher losses of runoff and total solids from 1:0 no buffer/rotational grazing and 1:0 no buffer/continuous grazing treatment combination plots, respectively, compared among other 2002 season treatment combinations. The 2003 results showed significantly higher runoff and total solids losses from 1:0 no buffer/no grazing treatment combination plots compared among all 2003 treatment combinations and from 1:0.1 vegetative buffer/no grazing treatment combination plots compared among all 2003 treatment combinations and with respective 2002 treatment combinations. However, the 2003 results indicated effective vegetative buffer performance with significantly lower runoff, total solids, and NO3-N losses from the larger 1:0.2 buffer area compared among the smaller 1:0.1 buffer area and 1:0 no buffer treatment combinations. The 2003 results also indicated a highly significant increase in losses of NO3-N from 1:0.1 buffer/no grazing treatment combination plots compared among other 2003 season treatment combinations and with respective 2002 treatment combinations. Overall results from this study suggest a shift from significantly higher 2002 season plot losses of continuous and rotational grazing treatment combinations to significantly higher 2003 season losses of no grazing treatment combinations. We speculate this shift to significantly higher runoff and contaminant losses from no grazing treatment combination plots during 2003 reflects the variability inherent to a complex and dynamic soil-water environment of livestock grazing areas. However, we also hypothesize the environmental conditions that largely consisted of a dense perennial cool-season grass type, high-relief landscape, and relatively high total rainfall depth may not necessarily include livestock grazing activities.

Footnotes

  • David F. Webber is a postdoctoral research associate and Steven K. Mickelson is a professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Syed I. Ahmed is a postdoctoral research associate in the School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. James R. Russell is a professor in the Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Wendy J. Powers is a professor in the Department of Animal Science and Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Richard C. Schultz is a professor in the Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. John L. Kovar is a soil scientist with the USDA Agricultural Research Service National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, Iowa.

  • © 2009 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 65 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 65, Issue 1
January/February 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Livestock grazing and vegetative filter strip buffer effects on runoff sediment, nitrate, and phosphorus losses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Livestock grazing and vegetative filter strip buffer effects on runoff sediment, nitrate, and phosphorus losses
D.F. Webber, S.K. Mickelson, S.I. Ahmed, J.R. Russell, W.J. Powers, R.C. Schultz, J.L. Kovar
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2010, 65 (1) 34-41; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.65.1.34

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Livestock grazing and vegetative filter strip buffer effects on runoff sediment, nitrate, and phosphorus losses
D.F. Webber, S.K. Mickelson, S.I. Ahmed, J.R. Russell, W.J. Powers, R.C. Schultz, J.L. Kovar
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2010, 65 (1) 34-41; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.65.1.34
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Simulating hydrologic responses to alternate grazing management practices at the ranch and watershed scales
  • Comparing different types of rural landowners: Implications for conservation practice adoption
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Sources of sediments during rainfall in the dry-hot valley region of China on a small watershed scale
  • The effects of soil aeration prior to dairy manure application on edge-of-field hydrology and nutrient fluxes in cold climate hayland agroecosystems
  • Effect of soil and water conservation measures on the reduction of runoff and sediment load in a loess hilly-gully region
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society