Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Analysis of river water for rice pesticides in eastern Arkansas from 2002 to 2008

J.D. Mattice, B.W. Skulman, R.J. Norman and E.E. Gbur
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2010, 65 (2) 130-140; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.2.130
J.D. Mattice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.W. Skulman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.J. Norman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.E. Gbur Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Pesticides used in rice production have the potential to harm nontarget species. The objective of this study was to measure concentrations of selected rice pesticides in four rivers in eastern Arkansas from spring through mid-August for 2002 through 2008 to determine if changes over time might be leading to environmental water quality problems above a threshold of 2 μg L−1 (2 ppb). Most of the pesticide detections were in May, June, and early July. The probability of detecting a given compound in any sample ranged from 0.0042 on the St. Francis River to 0.0387 on the Cache River. After 2002, clomazone and quinclorac accounted for 55% to 96% of detections each year. Of the samples collected, 60% to 86% that contained a pesticide contained only one pesticide, and 12% to 34% of all samples collected contained two pesticides. Large concentrations were more common in samples collected upstream than those taken downstream. Clomazone and quinclorac were often detected on consecutive sampling dates, indicating the possibility that concentrations greater than 2 μg L−1 may be present over an extended period of time. Compared to ecotoxicity data, observed levels of these pesticides do not appear to be causing an environmental problem unless there is strong synergism between clomazone and quinclorac over a period of several weeks.

Footnotes

  • John Mattice is a research associate professor, Briggs Skulman is a program associate III, and Richard Norman is a professor in the Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas. E.E. Gbur Jr. is a professor in the Agricultural Statistics Laboratory at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.

  • © 2009 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 65 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 65, Issue 2
March/April 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysis of river water for rice pesticides in eastern Arkansas from 2002 to 2008
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Analysis of river water for rice pesticides in eastern Arkansas from 2002 to 2008
J.D. Mattice, B.W. Skulman, R.J. Norman, E.E. Gbur
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2010, 65 (2) 130-140; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.65.2.130

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Analysis of river water for rice pesticides in eastern Arkansas from 2002 to 2008
J.D. Mattice, B.W. Skulman, R.J. Norman, E.E. Gbur
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2010, 65 (2) 130-140; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.65.2.130
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
  • Benefits, barriers, and use of cover crops in the western United States: Regional survey results
  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society