Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Water quality effects of simulated conservation practice scenarios in the Little River Experimental watershed

J. Cho, G. Vellidis, D.D. Bosch, R. Lowrance and T. Strickland
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2010, 65 (6) 463-473; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.6.463
J. Cho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Vellidis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.D. Bosch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Lowrance
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Strickland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Bosch D.D.,
    2. Sheridan J.M.
    . 2007. Stream discharge database, Little River Experimental watershed, Georgia, United States. Water Resources Research 43(9):W09473, doi:10.1029/2006WR005833.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bosch D.D.,
    2. Sheridan J.M.,
    3. Lowrance R.R.,
    4. Hubbard R.K.,
    5. Strickland T.C.,
    6. Feyereisen G.W.,
    7. Sullivan D.G.
    . 2007a. Little River Experimental watershed database. Water Resources Research 43:W09470, doi:10.1029/2006WR005844.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Bosch D.D.,
    2. Sheridan J.M.,
    3. Marshall L.K.
    . 2007b. Precipitation, soil moisture, and climate database, Little River Experimental watershed, Georgia, United States. Water Resources Research 43:W09472, doi:10.1029/2006WR005834.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bosch D.D.,
    2. Sheridan J.M.,
    3. Sullivan D.G.
    . 2006. Hydrologic impact of land-use changes in coastal plain watersheds. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 49(2):423-432.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bosch D.D.,
    2. Sheridan J.M.,
    3. Davis F.M.
    . 1999. Rainfall characteristics and spatial correlation for the Georgia coastal plain. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 42(6):1637-1644.
    OpenUrl
    1. Cho J.,
    2. Bosch D.,
    3. Lowrance R.,
    4. Strickland T.,
    5. Her Y.,
    6. Vellidis G.
    . 2010. Effect of watershed subdivision and filter width on SWAT simulation of a Coastal Plain watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46(3):586-602, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00436.x.
    OpenUrl
    1. Dalzell B.J.,
    2. Gowda P.H.,
    3. Mulla D.J.
    . 2004. Modeling sediment and phosphorus losses in an agricultural watershed to meet TMDLs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40(2):533-543.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Dillaha T.A.
    1990. Role of best management practices in restoring the health of the Chesapeake Bay. In Perspectives on the Chesapeake Bay, 1990: Advances in Estuarine Sciences. Chesapeake Bay Program, CBP/TRS41/90. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. Duriancik L.F.,
    2. Bucks D.,
    3. Dobrowolski J.P.,
    4. Drewes T.,
    5. Eckles S.D.,
    6. Jolley L.,
    7. Kellog R.L.,
    8. Lund D.,
    9. Makuch J.R.,
    10. O'Neill M.P.,
    11. Rewa C.A.,
    12. Walbridge M.R.,
    13. Parry R.,
    14. Weltz M.A.
    . 2008. The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):185a-188a, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.185A.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ekness P.,
    2. Randhir T.
    . 2007. Effects of riparian areas, stream order, and land use disturbance on watershed-scale habitat potential: An ecohydrologic approach to policy. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43(6):1468-1482.
    OpenUrl
    1. Feyereisen G.W.,
    2. Lowrance R.,
    3. Strickland T.C.,
    4. Bosch D.D.,
    5. Sheridan J.M.
    . 2008. Long-term stream chemistry trends in the southern Georgia Little River Experimental watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):475-486, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.475.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Feyereisen G.W.,
    2. Lowrance R.,
    3. Strickland T.C.,
    4. Sheridan J.M.,
    5. Hubbard R.K.,
    6. Bosch D.D.
    . 2007a. Long-term water chemistry database, Little River Experimental watershed, southeast Coastal Plain, United States. Water Resources Research 43(9):W09474, doi:10.1029/2006WR005835.
    OpenUrl
    1. Feyereisen G.W.,
    2. Strickland T.C.,
    3. Bosch D.D.,
    4. Sullivan D.G.
    . 2007b. Evaluation of SWAT manual calibration and input parameter sensitivity in the Little River watershed. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3):843-855.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gay P.,
    2. Vellidis G.,
    3. Delfino J.J.
    . 2006. The attenuation of atrazine and its major degradation products in a restored riparian buffer. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 49(5):1323-1339.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hubbard R.K.,
    2. Sheridan J.M.,
    3. Marti L.R.
    . 1990. Dissolved and suspended-solids transport from coastal-plain watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 19(3):413-420.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Jha M.K.,
    2. Gassman P.W.,
    3. Arnold J.G.
    . 2007. Water quality modeling for the Raccoon River watershed using SWAT. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(2):479-493.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lowrance R.,
    2. Sharpe J.K.,
    3. Sheridan J.M.
    . 1986. Long-term sediment deposition in the riparian zone of a coastal-plain watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41(4):266-271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lowrance R.,
    2. Vellidis G.
    . 1994. A conceptual model for assessing ecological risk to water quality function of bottomland hardwood forests. Environmental Management 19(2):239-258.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lowrance R.R.,
    2. Leonard R.A.,
    3. Asmussen L.E.,
    4. Todd R.L.
    . 1985. Nutrient budgets for agricultural watersheds in the southeastern coastal-plain. Ecology 66(1):287-296.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Neitsch S.L.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Kiniry J.R.,
    4. Williams J.R.
    . 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool theoretical documentation, version 2005.
    1. Richardson C.W.,
    2. Bucks D.A.,
    3. Sadler E.J.
    . 2008. The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):590-604, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sheridan J.M.
    1997. Rainfall-streamflow relations for coastal plain watersheds. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 13(3):333-344.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sheridan J.M.,
    2. Hubbard R.K.
    . 1987. Transport of solids in streamflow from Coastal-Plain watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 16(2):131-136.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Sheridan J.M.,
    2. Lowrance R.,
    3. Bosch D.D.
    . 1999. Management effects on runoff and sediment transport in riparian forest buffers. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 42(1):55-64.
    OpenUrl
    1. Sullivan D.G.,
    2. Batten H.L.
    . 2007. Little River Experimental watershed, Tifton, Georgia, United States: A historical geographic database of conservation practice implementation. Water Resources Research 43(9):W09475, doi:10.1029/2007WR006143.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Sullivan D.G.,
    2. Batten H.L.,
    3. Bosch D.,
    4. Sheridan J.,
    5. Strickland T.
    . 2007. Little river experimental watershed, Tifton, Georgia, United States: A geographic database. Water Resources Research 43(9):W09471, doi:10.1029/2006WR005836.
    OpenUrl
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Dosskey M.G.,
    3. Burkart M.R.,
    4. James D.E.,
    5. Helmers M.J.,
    6. Eisenhauer D.E.
    . 2009. Methods to prioritize placement of riparian buffers for improved water quality. Agroforestry Systems 75:17–25.
    OpenUrl
    1. Vellidis G.,
    2. Lowrance R.,
    3. Gay P.,
    4. Hubbard R.K.
    . 2003. Nutrient transport in a restored riparian wetland. Journal of Environmental Quality 32(2):711-726.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Vellidis G.,
    2. Lowrance R.,
    3. Gay P.,
    4. Wauchope R.D.
    . 2002. Herbicide transport in a restored riparian forest buffer system. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 45(1):89-97.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 65 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 65, Issue 6
November/December 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water quality effects of simulated conservation practice scenarios in the Little River Experimental watershed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Water quality effects of simulated conservation practice scenarios in the Little River Experimental watershed
J. Cho, G. Vellidis, D.D. Bosch, R. Lowrance, T. Strickland
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2010, 65 (6) 463-473; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.65.6.463

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Water quality effects of simulated conservation practice scenarios in the Little River Experimental watershed
J. Cho, G. Vellidis, D.D. Bosch, R. Lowrance, T. Strickland
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2010, 65 (6) 463-473; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.65.6.463
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Water quality and land cover in the Coastal Plain Little River watershed, Georgia, United States
  • Small differences in riparian vegetation significantly reduce land use impacts on stream flow and water quality in small agricultural watersheds
  • Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales
  • Distribution and Characterization of Salmonella enterica Isolates from Irrigation Ponds in the Southeastern United States
  • A decade of conservation effects assessment research by the USDA Agricultural Research Service: Progress overview and future outlook
  • USDA water quality projects and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed studies
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phytoremediation and high rainfall combine to improve soil and plant health in a North America Northern Great Plains saline sodic soil
  • Combining a saltation impact sensor and a wind tunnel to explore wind erosion processes–A case study in the Zhundong mining area, Xinjiang, China
  • Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from wood of Gliricidia sepium based on the pyrolysis temperature and its applications
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society