Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Financial and environmental consequences of a voluntary farm environmental assurance program in Michigan

C. Vollmer-Sanders, C. Wolf and S.S. Batie
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2011, 66 (2) 122-131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.2.122
C. Vollmer-Sanders
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Wolf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.S. Batie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Abdulkadri A.,
    2. Miller S.,
    3. Batie S.,
    4. Joshi S.
    . 2009. Environmental Stewardship of Dairy Producers in MAEAP. Michigan Dairy Review 14(1):13-16.
    OpenUrl
    1. Alberini A.,
    2. Segerson K.
    . 2002. Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality., Special Issue. The Practice of Environmental and Resource Economics. Environmental and Resource Economics 22(2):157-184.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Dartt B.,
    2. Schwab G.
    . 2001. Crops and Livestock Budgets Estimates for Michigan. Agricultural Economics Report No. 609. September 2001.
    1. Heimlich R.,
    2. Bernard C.H.
    . 1995. Economics of Agricultural Management Practices in the Coastal Zone. USDA Economic Research Service Agricultural Economics Report 698.
    1. Hively W.D.,
    2. Bryant R.B.,
    3. Fahey T.J.
    . 2005. Phosphorus concentrations in overland flow from diverse locations on a New York Dairy Farm. Journal of Environmental Quality 34:1224-1233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Johnson S.L.,
    2. Adams R.M.,
    3. Perry G.M.
    . 1991. The on-farm costs of reducing groundwater pollution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73:1063-1073.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. MAEAP (Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program)
    . 2011. http://www.maeap.org.
    1. Massey R.
    1998. Manure Distribution Cost Analyzer. http://agebb.missouri.edu/mgt/analyzer.htm.
    1. MDA (Michigan Department of Agriculture)
    . 2008. Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices for Manure Management and Utilization.
    1. Ouyang D.,
    2. Laboski C.
    . 2005. Report for 2005 MI50B: Use of Spatial Data and GIS in Evaluating Manure Application Risk Index.
    1. Poe G.L.,
    2. Bills N.L.,
    3. Bellows C.,
    4. Crosscombe P.,
    5. Koelsch R.K.,
    6. Kreher M.J.,
    7. Wright P.
    . 2001. Will voluntary and educational programs meet environmental objectives? Evidence from a survey of New York Dairy Farms. Review of Agricultural Economics 23:473-491.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Randhir T.O.,
    2. Lee J.G.
    . 1997. Economic and water quality impacts of reducing nitrogen and pesticide use in agriculture. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 26:39-51
    OpenUrl
    1. Ribaudo M.,
    2. Cattaneo A.,
    3. Agapoff J.
    . 2004. Cost of meeting manure nutrient application standards in hog production: The roles of EQIP and fertilizer offsets. Review of Agricultural Economics 26(4):430-444.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Ribaudo M.,
    2. Gollehon N.,
    3. Aillery M.,
    4. Kaplan J.,
    5. Johansson R.,
    6. Agapoff J.,
    7. Christensen L.,
    8. Breneman V.,
    9. Peters M.
    . 2003. Manure Management for Water Quality: Cost to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land. US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Agricultural Economic Report No. (AER-824), June.
    1. Sharpley A.N.,
    2. Daniel T.,
    3. Sims T.,
    4. Lemunyon J.,
    5. Stevens R.,
    6. Parry R.
    . 2003. Agriculture Phosphorus and Eutrophication Second Edition. ARS-149. Washington DC: USDA Agricultural Research Service.
    1. US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics
    . 2005. Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing and Farm Products. Washington, DC.
    1. USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)
    . 2004. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, DC: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    1. USDA NASS
    . 2006. Michigan Agricultural Statistics 2005-06. Michigan Field Office, East Lansing, MI.
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2003. Executive Summary: Costs Associated with Development and Implementation of Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2002. Economic Analysis of the Final Revisions to the NPDES and Effluent Guidelines for CAFOs: Appendix B. http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/afo/cafodocs.cfm.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 66 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 66, Issue 2
March/April 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Financial and environmental consequences of a voluntary farm environmental assurance program in Michigan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Financial and environmental consequences of a voluntary farm environmental assurance program in Michigan
C. Vollmer-Sanders, C. Wolf, S.S. Batie
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2011, 66 (2) 122-131; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.2.122

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Financial and environmental consequences of a voluntary farm environmental assurance program in Michigan
C. Vollmer-Sanders, C. Wolf, S.S. Batie
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2011, 66 (2) 122-131; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.2.122
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society