Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

Techniques for assessing the environmental outcomes of conservation practices applied to rangeland watersheds

Mark A. Weltz, Leonard Jolley, Dave Goodrich, Ken Boykin, Mark Nearing, Jeff Stone, Phil Guertin, Mariano Hernandez, Ken Spaeth, Fred Pierson, Christo Morris and Bill Kepner
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2011, 66 (5) 154A-162A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.5.154A
Mark A. Weltz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonard Jolley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dave Goodrich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Boykin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Nearing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff Stone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phil Guertin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariano Hernandez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Spaeth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred Pierson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christo Morris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bill Kepner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Prior-Magee J.S.,
    2. et al
    1. Boykin K.G.,
    2. Thompson B.C.,
    3. Deitner R.A.,
    4. Schrupp D.,
    5. Bradford D.,
    6. O'Brien L.,
    7. Drost C.,
    8. Propeck-Gray S.,
    9. Rieth W.,
    10. Thomas K.A.,
    11. Kepner W.,
    12. Lowry J.,
    13. Cross C.,
    14. Jones B.,
    15. Hamer T.,
    16. Mettenbrink C.,
    17. Oakes K.J.,
    18. Prior-Magee J.,
    19. Schulz K.,
    20. Wynne J.J.,
    21. King C.,
    22. Puttere J.,
    23. Schrader S.,
    24. Schwenke Z.
    . 2007. Predicted animal habitat distributions and species richness. Chapter 3 In Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Final Report, eds. Prior-Magee J.S., et al. Moscow, ID: US Geological Survey, Gap Analysis Program.
    1. Boykin K.G.,
    2. Thompson B.C.,
    3. Propeck-Gray S.
    . 2010. Accuracy of southwest regional gap analysis project habitat models in predicting physical features for habitat associations. Ecological Modeling 221:2769-2775.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Wilson E.O.
    1. Burley F.W.
    1988. Monitoring biological diversity for setting priorities in conservation. In Biodiversity. ed. Wilson E.O.. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
    1. Canfield H.E.,
    2. Goodrich D.C.,
    3. Burns I.S.
    . 2005. Application of models to predict post-fire runoff and sediment transport at the watershed scale in southwestern forests. In Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers. 2005 Watershed Management Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, July 22–25, 2005.
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Reyes M.R.,
    3. Green C.H.,
    4. Arnold J. G.
    . 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future directions. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50:1211-1250.
    OpenUrl
    1. Goodrich D.C.,
    2. Canfield H.E.,
    3. Burns I.S.,
    4. Semmens D.J.,
    5. Miller S.N.,
    6. Hernandez M.,
    7. Levick L.R.,
    8. Guertin D.P.,
    9. Kepner W.G.
    . Rapid post-fire hydrologic watershed assessment using the AGWA GIS-based hydrologic modeling tool. In Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers. 2005 Watershed Management Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, July 22–25, 2005.
    1. Goldman R.L.,
    2. Tallis H.
    . 2009. A Critical Analysis of Ecosystem Services as a Tool in Conservation Projects, The Possible Perils, the Promises, and the Partnerships. Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162:63-78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Herrick J.E.,
    2. Lessard V.C.,
    3. Spaeth K.E.,
    4. Shaver P.L.,
    5. Dayton R. S.,
    6. Pyke D.A.,
    7. Jolley L.,
    8. Goebel J.J.
    . 2010. National ecosystem assessments supported by scientific and local knowledge. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. doi:10.1890/100017.
    1. Landfire
    . 2011. http://www.landfire.gov.
    1. Miller S.N.,
    2. Semmens D.J.,
    3. Goodrich D.C.,
    4. Hernandez M.,
    5. Miller R.C.,
    6. Kepner W.G.,
    7. Guertin D.P.
    . 2007. The Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment Tool. Environmental Modeling and Software 22:365-377.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Mitchell J.E.
    2000. Rangeland resource trends in the United States: A technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-68. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
    1. North American Land Cover (NALC)
    . 2011. http://landcover.usgs.gov/landcoverdata.php.
    1. Nearing M.A.,
    2. Wei H.,
    3. Stone J.J.,
    4. Pierson F.B.,
    5. Spaeth K.E.,
    6. Weltz M.A.,
    7. Flanagan D.C.
    . 2011. A rangeland hydrology and erosion model. Transaction of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 54:1-8.
    OpenUrl
    1. NRC (National Research Council)
    . 1994. Rangeland health: New methods to classify, inventory and monitor rangelands. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
    1. Nusser S.M.,
    2. Goebel J.J.
    . 1997. The national resources inventory: A long-term multi-resource monitoring program. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4:181-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Nusser S.M.,
    2. Breidt F.J.,
    3. Fuller W.A.
    . 1998. Design and estimation for investigating the dynamics of natural resources. Ecological Applications 8:234-245.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Prior-Magee J.S.,
    2. Boykin K.G.,
    3. Bradford D.F.,
    4. Kepner W.G.,
    5. Lowry J.H.,
    6. Schrupp D.L.,
    7. Thomas K.A.,
    8. Thompson B.C.
    , eds. 2007. Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project Final Report. Moscow, ID: US Geological Survey, Gap Analysis Program.
    1. Ridder B.
    2008. Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 781-790.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Scott J.M.,
    2. Davis F.,
    3. Csuti B.,
    4. Noss R.,
    5. Butterfield B.,
    6. Groves C.,
    7. Anderson H.,
    8. Caicco S.,
    9. D'Erchia F.,
    10. Edwards T.C. Jr..,
    11. Ulliman J.,
    12. Wright R.G.
    . 1993. Gap analysis: A geographical approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123.
    1. Scott J.M.,
    2. Tear T.H.,
    3. Davis F.W.
    , eds. 1996. Gap analysis—a landscape approach to biodiversity planning. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
    1. Smith R.E.,
    2. Goodrich D.C.,
    3. Quinton J.N.
    . 1995. Dynamic, distributed simulation of watershed erosion: The KINEROS2 and EUROSEM models. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50(5):517-520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project (SWReGAP)
    . 2011. http://fws-nmcfwru.nmsu.edu/swregap.
    1. Spaeth K.E.,
    2. Peacock G.L.,
    3. Herrick J.E.,
    4. Shaver P.,
    5. Dayton R.
    . 2005. Rangeland field data techniques and data applications. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(5):114A-119A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Spaeth K.E.,
    2. Pierson F.B.,
    3. Herrick J.E.,
    4. Shaver P.L.,
    5. Pyke D.A.,
    6. Pellant M.,
    7. Thompson D.,
    8. Dayton B.
    . 2003. New proposed national resources inventory protocols on nonfederal rangelands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58(1):18A-21A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Srinivasan R.,
    2. Zhang X.,
    3. Arnold J.
    . 2010. SWAT Ungauged: Hydrological budget and crop yield predictions in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 53:1533-1546.
    OpenUrl
    1. USDA
    . 2009. Summary Report: 2007 National Resources Inventory. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service; Ames, Iowa: Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS//stelprdb1041379.pdf.
    1. USDA
    . 2011. RCA Appraisal 2011. Soil and Water Resources Conservation Act. 2011. Pre-publication. ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/rca/2011_RCA_Appraisal_Pre_Publication_Copy.pdf.
    1. USDA NRCS (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2007. National Resources Inventory. NRI Rangeland Field Study Handbook of Instructions. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2010. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Cultivated Cropland in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHQ/nri/ceap/UMRB_final_draft_061410.pdf.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2011a. Grazing Lands National Assessment. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/?ss=16&navtype=BROWSEBYSUBJECT&cid=NRCS143_014159&navid=960120000000000&pnavid=960000000000000&position=SubFeature*&ttype=detail&pname=Grazing%20Lands%20National%20Assessment%20|%20NRCS.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2011b. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Cultivated Cropland in the Chesapeake Bay Region. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1042076.pdf.
    1. Weltz M.A.,
    2. Jolley L.,
    3. Nearing M.,
    4. Stone J.,
    5. Goodrich D.,
    6. Spaeth K.,
    7. Kiniry J.,
    8. Arnold J.,
    9. Bubenheim D.,
    10. Hernandez M.,
    11. Wei H.
    . 2008. Assessing the benefits of grazing land conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):214A-217A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 66 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 66, Issue 5
September/October 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Techniques for assessing the environmental outcomes of conservation practices applied to rangeland watersheds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Techniques for assessing the environmental outcomes of conservation practices applied to rangeland watersheds
Mark A. Weltz, Leonard Jolley, Dave Goodrich, Ken Boykin, Mark Nearing, Jeff Stone, Phil Guertin, Mariano Hernandez, Ken Spaeth, Fred Pierson, Christo Morris, Bill Kepner
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2011, 66 (5) 154A-162A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.5.154A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Techniques for assessing the environmental outcomes of conservation practices applied to rangeland watersheds
Mark A. Weltz, Leonard Jolley, Dave Goodrich, Ken Boykin, Mark Nearing, Jeff Stone, Phil Guertin, Mariano Hernandez, Ken Spaeth, Fred Pierson, Christo Morris, Bill Kepner
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2011, 66 (5) 154A-162A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.5.154A
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Application of a rangeland soil erosion model using National Resources Inventory data in southeastern Arizona
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • How much grass will grow on your rangelands this year? Grass-Cast sheds light on the question!
  • Increasing agricultural conservation outreach through social science
  • Forest management and biochar for continued ecosystem services
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society