Fish community response to evolving channel complexity in an agricultural headwater system

References

1. 1. Angermeier P.L.,
   2. Schlosser I.J.

   . 1989. Species-area relationships for stream fishes. Ecology 70:1450-1462.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Benedict M.,
   2. Gottgens J.F.

   . 2006. Riparian Forests in NW Ohio Watersheds: Relations Between Landscape Structure, Land Use, and Water Quality in Regional Rivers. Final Report to the Ohio Lake Erie Commission (Grant: SG 251-05). Toledo, OH.
3. 1. Boody G.,
   2. Vondracek B.,
   3. Anodow D.A.,
   4. Krinke M.,
   5. Westra J.,
   6. Zimmerman J.,
   7. Welle P.

   . 2005. Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States. BioScience 55:27-38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Frothingham K.M.,
   2. Rhoads B.L.,
   3. Herricks E.E.

   . 2002. A multiscale conceptual framework for integrated ecogeomorphological research to support stream naturalization in the agricultural Midwest. Environmental Management 29:16-33.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. 1. Karr J.R.

   1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6):21-27.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. King K.W.,
   2. Smiley P.C.,
   3. Baker B.J.,
   4. Fausey N.R.

   . 2008. Validation of paired watersheds for assessing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):380-395, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.380.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Landwehr K.,
   2. Rhoads B.L.

   . 2003. Depositional response of a headwater stream to channelization, east central Illinois, USA. River Research and Applications 19:77-100.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
8. 1. Littell R.C.,
   2. Milliken G.A.,
   3. Stroup W.W.,
   4. Wolfinger R.D.,
   5. Schabenberger O.

   . 2006. SAS for Mixed Models, Second Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
9. 1. Lyons J.,
   2. Trimble S.W.,
   3. Paine L.K.

   . 2000. Grass versus trees: Managing riparian areas to benefit streams of central North America. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36:919-930.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Meyer J.L.,
    2. Strayer D.L.,
    3. Wallace J.B.,
    4. Eggert S.L.,
    5. Helfman G.S.,
    6. Leonard N.E.

    . 2007. The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43:86-103.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Ohio Division of Wildlife

    . 2003. Wildlife that are considered Endangered, Threatened, Species of Concern, Special Interest, Extirpated, or Extinct in Ohio. Columbus, OH. http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/Home/ExperienceWildlifeSubHomePage/Endangeredthreatenedspeciesplaceholder/resourcesmgtplansspecieslist/tabid/5664/Default.aspx.
12. 1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

    . 2006. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Columbus, OH. http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dsw/bioassess/BioCriteriaProtAqLife.aspx.
13. 1. Peterson J.T.,
    2. Banish N.P.,
    3. Thurow R.F.

    . 2005. Are block nets necessary? Movement of stream-dwelling salmonids in response to three common survey methods. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:732-743.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Rhoads B.L.,
    2. Schwartz J.S.,
    3. Porter S.

    . 2003. Stream geomorphology, bank vegetation, and three-dimensional habitat hydraulics for fish in midwestern agricultural streams. Water Resources Research 39:1218.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Roberts S.J.,
    2. Gottgens J.F.,
    3. Spongberg A.L.,
    4. Evans J.E.,
    5. Levine N.S.

    . 2007. An Integrated approach to assessing potential dam removals: An example from the Ottawa River, NW Ohio. Environmental Management 39(1):113-124.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. 1. Rosenzweig M.L.

    2002. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Sixth Edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
17. 1. Schlosser I.J.

    1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 303:71-81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Sharma S.,
    2. Jackson D.A.

    . 2007. Fish assemblages and environmental conditions in the lower reaches of northeastern Lake Erie tributaries. Journal of Great Lakes Research 33:15-27.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Smiley P.C.,
    2. Gillespie R.B.,
    3. King K.W.,
    4. Huang C.

    . 2008. Contribution of habitat and water quality to the integrity of fish communities in agricultural drainage ditches. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):218A-219A, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.218A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
20. 1. Stammler K.L.,
    2. McLaughlin R.L.,
    3. Mandrak N.E.

    . 2008. Streams modified for drainage provide fish habitat in agricultural areas. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:509-522.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Trautman M.B.

    1981. The Fishes of Ohio. Second Edition. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
22. 1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency.

    2009. Great Lakes Area of Concerns. Maumee Area of Concern. http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/aoc/maumee.html.
23. 1. Ward A.D.,
    2. Trimble S.W.

    . 2004. Environmental Hydrology. Second Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.