Adoption of the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program in the New York City watershed: The role of farmer attitudes

References

1. 1. Atari D.O.A.,
   2. Yiridoe E.K.,
   3. Smale S.,
   4. Duinker P.N.

   . 2009. What motivates farmers to participate in the Nova Scotia environmental farm plan program? Evidence and environmental policy implications. Journal of Environmental Management 90(2):1269-1279.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. 1. Buttel F.H.,
   2. Larson O.W. III.,
   3. Gillespie G.W. Jr..

   1990. The Sociology of Agriculture. Westport: Greenwood Press.
3. 1. Breakey P.

   2009, July 27. Watershed Deal Saves Jobs. Oneonta Daily Star. Oneonta, NY.
4. 1. Dillman D.A.

   2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. 1. Force D.,
   2. Bills N.

   . 1989. Participation in the CRP: Implications of the New York experience. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(5):512-516.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Galusha D.

   1999. Liquid Assets: A History of New York City's Water System. Fleishmanns, NY: Purple Mountain Press.
7. 1. Greiner R.,
   2. Patterson L.,
   3. Miller O.

   . 2009. Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers. Agricultural Systems 99(2-3):86-104.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Huitema D.,
   2. Mostert E.,
   3. Egas W.,
   4. Moellenkamp S.,
   5. Pahl-Wostl C.,
   6. Yalcin R.

   . 2009. Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14(1):26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art26/.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. James E.E.

   2005. Factors influencing the adoption and non-adoption of the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program in the Cannonsville watershed, New York. Master's thesis, Penn State University.
10. 1. James E.E.,
    2. Kleinman P.,
    3. Veith T.,
    4. Stedman R.,
    5. Sharpley A.

    . 2006. Phosphorus contributions from pastured dairy cattle to streams of the Cannonsville Watershed, New York. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 62(1):40-47.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Napier T.L.,
    2. McCutcheon K.,
    3. Fish J.

    . 2008. Factors affecting natural resource conservation investments of residents in the Lower Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(1):18-28.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. National Research Council

    . 1999. New strategies for America's watersheds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. 1. National Research Council

    . 2000. Watershed Management for Potable Water Supply: Assessing the New York City Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. 1. Nowak P.J.

    1987. The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: Economic and diffusion explanations. Rural Sociology 87(2):208-220.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Nowak P.J.,
    2. Korshing P.J.,
    3. Wagener D.J.,
    4. Hoban T.J.

    . 1983. Sociological Factors in the Adoption of Agricultural Best Management Practices. Athens, GA: US Environmental Protection Agency.
16. 1. NYC DEP (New York City Department of Environmental Protection)

    . 2002. New York City Watershed Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Enrolls 1000 Acres of Stream Buffers to Protect Drinking Water Quality. http://nyc.gov/html/dep/html/press_releases/02-18pr.shtml.
17. 1. NYC DEP

    . 2009. Filtration Avoidance Annual Report For the period January 1 through December 31, 2008. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/drinking_water/index.shtml.
18. 1. Oneal B.J.,
    2. Heske E.J.,
    3. Stafford J.D.

    . 2008. Waterbird response to wetlands restored through the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. Journal of Wildlife Management 72(3):654-664.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Pampel F.,
    2. van Es J.C.

    . 1977. Environmental quality and issues of adoption research. Rural Sociology 42:57-71.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
20. 1. Parker J.S.,
    2. Moore R.,
    3. Weaver M.

    . 2007. Land tenure as a variable in community based watershed projects: Some lessons from the Sugar Creek Watershed, Wayne and Holmes counties, Ohio. Society & Natural Resources 20(9):815-833.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Furuseth O.J.,
    2. Lapping MB

    1. Pfeffer M.,
    2. Wagenet L.

    . 1999. Planning for environmental responsibility and equity: A critical appraisal of rural/urban relations in the New York City watershed. In Contested Countryside: The Rural Urban Fringe in North America, ed. Furuseth O.J., Lapping MB, 179-205. Aldershot: Ashgate.
22. 1. Goetz S.J.,
    2. Shortle J.S.,
    3. Bergstrom J.C.

    1. Pfeffer M.J.,
    2. Wagenet L.P.,
    3. Sydenstricker-Neto J.,
    4. Meola C.

    . 2005. Value conflict and land use planning: An example at the rural-urban interface. In Land Use Problems and Conflicts, ed. Goetz S.J., Shortle J.S., Bergstrom J.C., 186-201. London: Routledge.
23. 1. Pires M.

    2004. Watershed protection for a world city: The case of New York. Land Use Policy. 21:161-175.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Platt R.H.,
    2. Barten P.K.,
    3. Pfeffer M.J.

    . 2000. A full, clean glass? Managing New York City's watersheds. Environment 42(5):8-21.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Plummer R.,
    2. FitzGibbon J.

    . 2006. People matter: The importance of social capital in the co-management of natural resources. Natural Resources Forum 30:51-62.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Prokopy L.S.

    2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(5):300-311, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 1. Rhodes H.M.,
    2. Leland L.S.,
    3. Niven B.E.

    . 2002. Farmers, streams, information, and money: Does informing farmers about riparian management have any effect? Environmental Management 20(5):665-677.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Rogers E.M.

    2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
29. 1. Ryan R.L.,
    2. Erickson D.L.,
    3. De Young R.

    . 2003. Farmers' motivations for adoption conservation practices along riparian zones in a Mid-Western agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46(1):19-37.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Soule M.J.,
    2. Tegene A.,
    3. Wiebe K.D.

    . 2000. Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(4):993-1005.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 1. Suter J.F.,
    2. Poe G.L.,
    3. Bills N.L.

    . 2008. Do landowners respond to land retirement incentives? Evidence from the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. Land Economics 84(1):17-30.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 1. Teels B.M.,
    2. Rewa C.A.,
    3. Myers J.

    . 2006. Aquatic condition response to riparian buffer establishment. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(4):927-935.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. 1. USDA CCC (Commodity Credit Corporation)

    . 1998. Agreement between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Credit Corporation, and the City of New York, and the State of New York Implementing the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/nycrep.pdf.
34. 1. USDA FSA

    . 2007. Newsroom: USDA enrolls 1 millionth acre in Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/newsReleases?area=newsroom&subject=landing&topic=ner&newstype=newsrel&type=detail&item=nr_20080117_rel_0014.html.
35. 1. USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)

    . 2009. Census of Agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/.
36. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 1997. NRCS New York Conservation Practice Standard: Riparian Forest Buffer (ACRE code 391).
37. 1. Walter M.T.,
    2. Brooks E.S.,
    3. Walter M.F.,
    4. Steenhuis T.S.,
    5. Scott C.A.,
    6. Boll J.

    . 2001. Evaluation of soluble phosphorus loading from manure-applied fields under various spreading strategies. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 56(4):329-335.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text