Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Multiple corn stover removal rates for cellulosic biofuels and long-term water quality impacts

M.A. Thomas, B.A. Engel and I. Chaubey
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2011, 66 (6) 431-444; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.6.431
M.A. Thomas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.A. Engel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Chaubey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The objective of this work was to quantify the long-term runoff, percolation, erosion, and losses in nitrate-nitrogen, total phosphorus and pesticides attributed to multiple levels of corn stover (Zea mays L.) removal. A field-scale modeling framework, which utilized the Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems/National Agricultural Pesticide Risk Analysis (GLEAMS–NAPRA) model and the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, Version 2 (RUSLE2), was created and applied within Indiana to evaluate water quality impacts associated with three corn stover removal rates (38%, 52.5%, and 70%), based on proposed harvest efficiencies of three multipass field collection systems, with two tillage options (fall chisel/spring disk and no-till). The model results suggest that removing corn stover at the rates 38% (2.40 to 3.19 t ha−1 [1.07 to 1.42 tn ac−1]), 52.5% (3.32 to 4.41 t ha−1 [1.48 to 1.97 tn ac−1]) and 70% (4.42 to 5.88 t ha−1 [1.97 to 2.63 tn ac−1]), with no-till practices, would result in statistically significant higher annual erosion losses (p < 0.05), when compared with no residue removal management. On soils with 4% or less slopes, a 70% residue removal rate—4.4 to 5.9 t ha−1 (1.96 to 2.63 tn ac−1)—with no-till practices, would result in slightly lower erosion losses when compared with conventional tillage involving no residue removal. No-till systems produced higher total phosphorus losses when commercial fertilizer was surface applied as opposed to the incorporation method practiced with conventional till-age. However, levels of leached nitrate-nitrogen from no-till systems were significantly lower than losses from conventional tillage, partly due to lower mineralization processes associated with nutrient cycling. The results point to the necessity of establishing new sets of regional soil and water conservation criteria that would include harvesting unprocessed agricultural residue following corn-grain harvest to meet biofuel demands.

  • © 2011 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 66 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 66, Issue 6
November/December 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multiple corn stover removal rates for cellulosic biofuels and long-term water quality impacts
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Multiple corn stover removal rates for cellulosic biofuels and long-term water quality impacts
M.A. Thomas, B.A. Engel, I. Chaubey
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2011, 66 (6) 431-444; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.6.431

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Multiple corn stover removal rates for cellulosic biofuels and long-term water quality impacts
M.A. Thomas, B.A. Engel, I. Chaubey
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2011, 66 (6) 431-444; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.66.6.431
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Recent advances in precision (target) conservation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing Soil Vulnerability Index classification with respect to rainfall characteristics
  • Trade-off analysis of water conservation and water consumption of typical ecosystems at different climatic scales in the Dongjiang River basin, China
  • Long-term subsoiling and straw return increase soil organic carbon fractions and crop yield
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society