Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont

B.C. Sawyers, M.C. Bolding, W.M. Aust and W.A. Lakel
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation July 2012, 67 (4) 300-310; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.4.300
B.C. Sawyers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.C. Bolding
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.M. Aust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.A. Lakel III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Soil erosion is influenced by factors such as soil properties, slope, ground cover, climatic conditions, and forest management activities, including skid trails. Skid trails typically represent 2% to 10% of a timber harvest's area; therefore, the potential to negatively affect site productivity and water quality as a result of harvesting is of concern. Soil erosion can reduce site nutrient reserves and increase sedimentation of nearby streams. Forestry best management practices (BMPs) are designed to provide effective techniques for maintaining environmental stability. Although BMPs are widely implemented, few data exist regarding the efficacy and costs of different BMP options for skid trail closure. The study objectives were to evaluate erosion control effectiveness and implementation costs of five overland skid trail closure techniques. The closure techniques were (1) waterbar only (Control), (2) waterbar plus seed (Seed), (3) waterbar plus seed and mulch (Mulch), (4) waterbar plus hardwood slash (Hardwood), and (5) waterbar plus pine slash (Pine). Each treatment was installed following harvesting and replicated on four trails to provide twenty experimental erosion plots. Geotextile sediment traps (Dirtbags) were used to filter skid trail sediment. Accumulated sediments were weighed monthly for one year, and erosion rates were determined for each treatment. Two commonly used erosion models, Universal Soil Loss Equation as modified for forests (USLE-Forest) and Water Erosion Prediction Project for Forest Roads (WEPP-Roads), were also applied to each treatment. Sediment collected from traps indicated that the Mulch treatment was the most effective for reducing erosion (3.29 Mg ha−1 y−1 [1.47 tn ac−1 yr−1]), followed by Hardwood (5.08 Mg ha−1 y−1 [2.27 tn ac−1 yr−1]), Pine (5.40 Mg ha−1 y−1 [2.41 tn ac−1 yr−1]), Seed (13.57 Mg ha−1 y−1 [6.06 tn ac−1 yr−1]), and Control (24.24 Mg ha−1 y−1 [10.82 tn ac−1 yr−1]). Overall, WEPP-Roads estimates were more similar to measured erosion than USLE-Forest estimates, but both models generally agreed with actual erosion trends. The Seed treatment was the least expensive beyond waterbars alone, but it was only moderately effective at limiting erosion. Incorporating slash dispersal and compaction onto overland skid trails during harvesting activities may be the best option for reducing BMP costs and long term soil stability on disturbed soils associated with log skidding.

  • © 2012 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 67 (4)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 67, Issue 4
July/August 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont
B.C. Sawyers, M.C. Bolding, W.M. Aust, W.A. Lakel
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2012, 67 (4) 300-310; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.4.300

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont
B.C. Sawyers, M.C. Bolding, W.M. Aust, W.A. Lakel
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2012, 67 (4) 300-310; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.4.300
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The effectiveness of forestry best management practices at skidder stream crossings in Virginia
  • Forestry best management practices for erosion control in haul road ditches near stream crossings
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gully erosion susceptibility prediction in Mollisols using machine learning models
  • Stability and splash erosion characteristics of lateritic red soil aggregates in the South Subtropical Zone of China
  • Individual- and county-level factors associated with farmers’ use of 4R Plus nutrient management practices
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society