Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Response of reservoir atrazine concentrations following regulatory and management changes

K.W. King, N.R. Fausey, R. Dunn, P.C. Smiley and B.L. Sohngen
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2012, 67 (5) 416-424; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.416
K.W. King
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.R. Fausey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Dunn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.C. Smiley Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.L. Sohngen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, atrazine concentration exceeding the drinking water standard of 3 μg L−1 (parts per billion) in US drinking water supplies has been identified as a costly and major water quality concern. Atrazine levels in Columbus, Ohio, tap water reached 8.74 μg L−1 in the early 1990s, leading to a watershed-based approach aimed to reduce elevated atrazine concentrations. In 1999, a special Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) was implemented in the watershed that feeds Hoover Reservoir, the primary drinking water supply for Columbus, Ohio. Through EQIP, the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) offered financial incentives to farmers and operators to apply alternative pesticide management practices in an effort to reduce atrazine concentrations in the reservoir and maintain the concentrations below the drinking water standard. Monthly reservoir atrazine concentrations measured from 1985 through 2005 represent three distinct time periods with respect to atrazine management: no label restrictions (1985 to 1992), post label restrictions (1993 to 1998), and post label restrictions plus EQIP implementation (1999 to 2005). Significant (p < 0.05) reductions in mean monthly reservoir atrazine concentrations were noted between all three time periods: no label restrictions (2.27 μg L−1) > post label restrictions (1.99 μg L−1) > post label restrictions plus EQIP implementation (1.18 μg L−1). Regression analyses indicated that May through June precipitation and hectares enrolled in the EQIP pest management practice (Natural Resource Conservation Service Practice 595) were the two most important predictors of reservoir atrazine concentration. Additionally, for every dollar spent on the NRCS 595 pest management practice cost shared through the EQIP program, a US$2.73 benefit for the City of Columbus was realized through reduced drinking water treatment costs to remove atrazine. For farmers and operators, atrazine is an economically viable and effective herbicide for corn production. This study indicates that annually eliminating atrazine application on approximately 16% of the crop production acres may reduce and maintain reservoir atrazine concentrations below drinking water thresholds.

  • © 2012 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 67 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 67, Issue 5
September/October 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response of reservoir atrazine concentrations following regulatory and management changes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Response of reservoir atrazine concentrations following regulatory and management changes
K.W. King, N.R. Fausey, R. Dunn, P.C. Smiley, B.L. Sohngen
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2012, 67 (5) 416-424; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.416

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Response of reservoir atrazine concentrations following regulatory and management changes
K.W. King, N.R. Fausey, R. Dunn, P.C. Smiley, B.L. Sohngen
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2012, 67 (5) 416-424; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.416
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • STEWARDS: A decade of increasing the impact of Agricultural Research Service watershed research programs
  • Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Research Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Research Manuscripts

  • Estimating biofuel feedstock water footprints using system dynamics
  • Occurrence, sources, and cancer risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls in agricultural soils from the Three Gorges Dam region, China
  • Effect of switchgrass plantations on soil acidity, organic carbon, and total nitrogen in a semiarid region
Show more Research Manuscripts

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society