Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies

A. Sharpley, P. Richards, S. Herron and D. Baker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2012, 67 (5) 442-450; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.442
A. Sharpley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Richards
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Herron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Baker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The impairment of surface water quality in the United States has been well documented, as has the potential for agriculture to contribute nutrients that accelerate this impairment. In response, widespread implementation of conservation strategies to reduce nutrient losses and mitigate impairment has occurred. This study reports and compares the outcomes of voluntary and litigated conservation and nutrient management strategies in watersheds of Lake Erie and northwest Arkansas, respectively. In the Maumee (MRW) and Sandusky River Watersheds (SRW) that drain into Lake Erie, voluntary strategies to reduce total phosphorus (P) loading from cropland were implemented in the mid-1980s. The strategies focused on reducing particulate P loading through erosion control programs, utilizing no-till and reduced-till management. As various subsidies became available, as well as improved planters and better herbicides, farmers rapidly adopted conservation tillage. Between 1975 and 1995, this led to a decline in fertilizer and manure application and increased conservation tillage acreage, which contributed to a reduction in total and dissolved P export. In the last 10 years, however, increased no-till acres with surface soil P stratification, fall and winter broadcasting of P fertilizer, and more extreme rainfall-runoff events have contributed to an increase in dissolved P export. In the Eucha-Spavinaw Watershed (ESW), northwest Arkansas, litigation required a minimum of 33% of the poultry litter produced be exported out of ESW and the remaining land applications to be based on the risk of P runoff. Use of the Eucha-Spavinaw P Index (ESPI) has decreased the land application of poultry litter from an average 5.6 t ha−1 (2.5 tn ac−1) before litigation to 2.5 t ha−1 (1.12 tn ac−1) in 2009. This, combined with the fact that 70% to 80% of the produced litter was being transported out of ESW, has greatly reduced the risk of P loss in agricultural runoff. At 2009 fertilizer prices, the loss of P and nitrogen (N) from cropped acres in MRW and SRW was US$13 ha−1 (US$5 ac−1), and the value of P and N exported in litter from ESW was US$40 ha−1 (US$16 ac−1). While voluntary implementation of BMPs in Lake Erie watersheds decreased total P export, continued monitoring is needed to adaptively manage these BMPs to ensure their long-term effectiveness. Litigated BMP adoption in northwest Arkansas did reduce land application of litter but at a cost to beef grazing operations, which are symbiotic to poultry operations and had been using litter as a low-cost source of N and P.

  • © 2012 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 67 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 67, Issue 5
September/October 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 17 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies
A. Sharpley, P. Richards, S. Herron, D. Baker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2012, 67 (5) 442-450; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.442

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies
A. Sharpley, P. Richards, S. Herron, D. Baker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2012, 67 (5) 442-450; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.442
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Phosphorus fertilization, soil stratification, and potential water quality impacts
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Research Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Research Editorial

  • Ecosystem services in Iowa agricultural catchments: Hypotheses for scenarios with water quality wetlands and improved tile drainage
  • Soil health: Meaning, measurement, and value through a critical zone lens
  • Integrated data across multiple and diverse disciplines are essential for developing a sustainable food system
Show more Research Editorial

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society