Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies

A. Sharpley, P. Richards, S. Herron and D. Baker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2012, 67 (5) 442-450; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.442
A. Sharpley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Richards
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Herron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Baker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 67 no. 5 442-450
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.442

Published By 
Soil and Water Conservation Society
Print ISSN 
0022-4561
Online ISSN 
1941-3300
History 
  • Published online September 10, 2012.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2012 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

Author Information

  1. A. Sharpley,
  2. P. Richards,
  3. S. Herron and
  4. D. Baker

Article usage

Article usage: September 2012 to January 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Sep 2012229050
Oct 2012176032
Nov 201286021
Dec 201250020
Jan 201333018
Feb 20133507
Mar 201342022
Apr 201337022
May 20133106
Jun 20131507
Jul 20131702
Aug 20131708
Sep 201333011
Oct 20132706
Nov 20134306
Dec 20133206
Jan 20142907
Feb 20143104
Mar 201426011
Apr 201433019
May 20143408
Jun 20142107
Jul 201419014
Aug 201419010
Sep 201423011
Oct 201423014
Nov 201426015
Dec 201420022
Jan 20152409
Feb 201523017
Mar 201532014
Apr 201518011
May 201515012
Jun 201530011
Jul 20151308
Aug 201529010
Sep 201527012
Oct 201527013
Nov 201520013
Dec 2015905
Jan 201627010
Feb 201622010
Mar 2016809
Apr 201615013
May 201629015
Jun 20162507
Jul 201620010
Aug 201623016
Sep 20162109
Oct 201625012
Nov 201622016
Dec 20161706
Jan 2017341973
Feb 201714013
Mar 20171507
Apr 201719013
May 201720013
Jun 20171209
Jul 20171107
Aug 20171007
Sep 201718015
Oct 201725028
Nov 20172808
Dec 20171105
Jan 20181708
Feb 20182007
Mar 201818011
Apr 20182217
May 201822011
Jun 201810010
Jul 20181705
Aug 20181706
Sep 20181704
Oct 2018906
Nov 201824015
Dec 20181407
Jan 20191005
Feb 20191308
Mar 20192007
Apr 201912011
May 20191309
Jun 20191309
Jul 201913010
Aug 20192109
Sep 201912011
Oct 201911012
Nov 201922011
Dec 201917016
Jan 20202507
Feb 20202109
Mar 20201208
Apr 2020707
May 20201101
Jun 2020305
Jul 20201005
Aug 20201505
Sep 20201306
Oct 20201408
Nov 20201006
Dec 2020605
Jan 20211405
Feb 2021605
Mar 20212003
Apr 20211405
May 202124011
Jun 202126015
Jul 20211407
Aug 20211009
Sep 20219010
Oct 202114019
Nov 202112013
Dec 20211605
Jan 202218010
Feb 20221408
Mar 202215011
Apr 20222007
May 202215013
Jun 20222109
Jul 20222207
Aug 20221102
Sep 20229010
Oct 202213012
Nov 20221208
Dec 2022801
Jan 202362010

Cited By...

  • 28 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 67 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 67, Issue 5
September/October 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies
A. Sharpley, P. Richards, S. Herron, D. Baker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2012, 67 (5) 442-450; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.442

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Case study comparison between litigated and voluntary nutrient management strategies
A. Sharpley, P. Richards, S. Herron, D. Baker
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2012, 67 (5) 442-450; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.67.5.442
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Phosphorus fertilization, soil stratification, and potential water quality impacts
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Research Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Research Editorial

  • Ecosystem services in Iowa agricultural catchments: Hypotheses for scenarios with water quality wetlands and improved tile drainage
  • Soil health: Meaning, measurement, and value through a critical zone lens
  • Integrated data across multiple and diverse disciplines are essential for developing a sustainable food system
Show more Research Editorial

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society