Paying for sediment: Field-scale conservation practice targeting, funding, and assessment using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool

References

1. 1. Arabi M.,
   2. Frankenberger J.R.,
   3. Engel B.A.,
   4. Arnold J.G.

   . 2008. Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT. Journal of Hydrological Processes 22(16):3042–3055.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Arabi M.,
   2. Govindaraju R.S.,
   3. Hantush M.M.

   . 2006. Cost-effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm. Water Resources Research 42:W10429.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Arnold J.G.,
   2. Allen P.M.

   . 1999. Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(2):411–424.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Arnold J.G.,
   2. Srinivasan R.,
   3. Muttiah R.S.,
   4. Williams J.R.

   . 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1):73–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bracmort K.S.,
   2. Arabi M.,
   3. Frankenberger J.R.,
   4. Engel B.A.,
   5. Arnold J.G.

   . 2006. Modeling long-term water quality impact of structural BMPs. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 49(2):367–374.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Busteed P.R.,
   2. Storm D.E.,
   3. White M.J.,
   4. Stoodley S.H.

   . 2009. Using SWAT to target critical source sediment and phosphorus areas in the Wister Lake Basin, USA Amer. The Journal of Environmental Sciences 5(2):156–163.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Chaubey I.,
   2. Chiang L.,
   3. Gitau M.W.,
   4. Mohamed S.

   . 2010. Effectiveness of best management practices in improving water quality in a pasture-dominated watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(6):424–446, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.6.424.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 1. Daggupati P.,
   2. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
   3. Sheshukov A.Y.,
   4. Barnes P.L.,
   5. Devlin D.L.

   . 2011. Field-level targeting using SWAT: Mapping output from HRUs to fields and assessing limitations of GIS input data. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 54(2):501–514.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Dalzell B.J.,
   2. Gowda P.H.,
   3. Mulla D.J.

   . 2004. Modeling sediment and phosphorus losses in an agricultural watershed to meet TMDLs. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40(2):533–543.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
10. 1. Devlin D.,
    2. Dhuyvetter K.,
    3. McVay K.,
    4. Kastens T.,
    5. Rice C.,
    6. Janssen K.,
    7. Pierzynski G.

    . 2003. Water quality Best Management Practices, effectiveness, and cost for reducing contaminant losses from cropland. Publication MF-2572. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
11. 1. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
    2. Maski D.,
    3. Janssen K.A.,
    4. Tuppad P.,
    5. Pierzynski G.M.

    . 2010a. Modeling nutrient yields from combined in-field crop practices using SWAT. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 53(5):1557–1568.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
    2. Srinivasan R.,
    3. Arnold J.G.

    . 2010b. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model: Current Developments and Applications. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 53(5):1423–1431.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Osei E.,
    3. Saleh A.,
    4. Rodecap J.,
    5. Norvell S.,
    6. Williams J.R.

    . 2006. Alternative practices for sediment and nutrient loss control on livestock farms in northeast Iowa. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 117:135–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Reyes M.R.,
    3. Green C.H.,
    4. Arnold J.G.

    . 2007. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(4):1211–1250.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Gitau M.W.,
    2. Veith T.L.,
    3. Gburek W.J.

    , 2004. Farm-Level optimization of BMP placement for cost-effective pollution reduction. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 47(6):1923–193.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Gitau M.W.,
    2. Veith T.L.,
    3. Gburek W.J.,
    4. Jarrett A.R.

    . 2006. Watershed level best management practice selection and placement in the Town Brook Watershed, New York. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42(6):1565–1581.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Holland D.D.

    1971. Sediment yields from small drainage areas in Kansas. Bulletin No. 16. Topeka, KS: The Kansas Water Resources Board.
18. 1. Logsdon R.

    2011. Development of a quantification method for ecosystem services. Master's thesis, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering.
19. 1. Maringanti C.,
    2. Chaubey I.,
    3. Popp J.

    . 2009. Development of a multiobjective optimization tool for the selection and placement of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control. Water Resources Research 45:W0640.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Maski D.,
    2. Mankin K.R.,
    3. Janssen K.A.,
    4. Tuppad P.,
    5. Pierzynski G.M.

    . 2008. Modeling runoff and sediment yields from combined in-field crop practices using SWAT. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(4):193–203, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.4.193.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Merriman K.R.,
    2. Gitau M.W.,
    3. Chaubey I.

    . 2009. A tool for estimating best management practice effectiveness in Arkansas. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 25(2s):199–213.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Van Liew M.W.,
    4. Bingner R.L.,
    5. Harmel R.D.,
    6. Veith T.L.

    . 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3):885–900.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Nash J.E.,
    2. Sutcliffe J.V.

    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3):282–290.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
24. 1. Neitsch S.L.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Kiniry J.R.,
    4. Williams J.R.

    . 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), Theoretical documentation. Temple, TX: USDA Agricultural Research Service Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
25. 1. Pionke H.B.,
    2. Gburek W.J.,
    3. Sharpley A.N.

    . 2000. Critical source area controls on water quality in an agricultural watershed located in the Chesapeake basin. Ecological Engineering 14(3):255–265.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Santhi C.,
    2. Srinivasan R.,
    3. Arnold J.G.,
    4. Williams J.R.

    . 2006. A modeling approach to evaluate the impacts of water quality management plans implemented in a watershed in Texas. Environmental Modelling and Software 21(8):1141–1157.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Sheshukov A.Y.,
    2. Daggupati P.,
    3. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
    4. Lee M.

    . 2011. High Spatial Resolution Soil Data for Watershed Modeling: 1. Development of a SSURGO-ArcSWAT Utility. Journal of Natural and Environmental Sciences 2(2):15–24.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Steele K.

    2006. Atrazine Best Management Practices: Impacts on Water Quality. Master's thesis, Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
29. 1. Strauss P.,
    2. Leone A.,
    3. Ripa M.N.,
    4. Turpin N.,
    5. Lescot J.M.,
    6. Laplana R.

    . 2007. Using critical source areas for targeting cost-effective best management practices to mitigate phosphorus and sediment transfer at the watershed scale. Soil Use Management 23(1):144–153.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Tripathi M.P.,
    2. Panda R.K.,
    3. Raghuwanshi N.S.

    . 2003. Identification and prioritization of critical sub-watersheds for soil conservation management using the SWAT model. Biosystems Engineering 85:365–379.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Tuppad P.,
    2. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
    3. McVay K.A.

    . 2010a. Strategic targeting of cropland management using watershed modeling. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 12(3):12–24

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Tuppad P.,
    2. Kannan N.,
    3. Srinivasan R.

    . 2010b. Simulation of agricultural management alternatives for watershed protection. Water Resource Management 24(12):3115–3144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2005. Soil data mart. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/Default.aspx.
34. 1. USGS (US Geological Survey)

    . 1999. National elevation dataset. Sioux Falls, SD: US Geological Survey, EROS Data Center. www.kansasgis.org/catalog/catalog.cfm.
35. 1. Vaché K.,
    2. Eilers J.,
    3. Santelmann M.

    . 2002. Water quality modeling of alternative agricultural scenarios in the US Corn Belt. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:773–787.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. Veith T.L.,
    2. Sharpley A.N.,
    3. Arnold J.G.

    . 2008. Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field level data. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 51(2s):471–483.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Waidler D.,
    2. White M.,
    3. Steglich E.,
    4. Wang X.,
    5. Williams J.R.,
    6. Jones A.,
    7. Srinivasan R.,
    8. Arnold J.G.

    . 2009. Conservation practice modeling for SWAT and APEX. In Proceedings of the 2009 International SWAT conference, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, August 5–7, 2009.
38. 1. White M.J.,
    2. Storm D.E.,
    3. Busteed P.R.,
    4. Stoodley S.H.,
    5. Phillips S.J.

    . 2009. Evaluating nonpoint source critical source area contributions at the watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Quality 38(4):1654–1663.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
39. 1. Williams J.R.

    1975. Sediment yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor. ARS-S-40. Washington, DC: USDA, Agricultural Research Service.
40. 1. Wischmeier W.H.,
    2. Smith D.D.

    . 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 537. Washington DC: USDA.