Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Side-by-side evaluation of four level spreader–vegetated filter strips and a swale in eastern North Carolina

E.M.P. Knight, W.F. Hunt and R.J. Winston
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2013, 68 (1) 60-72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.1.60
E.M.P. Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W.F. Hunt III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.J. Winston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Level spreader–vegetated filter strips (LS–VFSs) and swales are versatile, low cost stormwater control measures (SCMs). The purpose of this study was to determine the runoff volume and pollutant reductions of four LS–VFSs and a swale in eastern North Carolina (NC). Two vegetated filter strips (VFSs) of 8 m long by 6 m wide (26 ft long by 20 ft wide), two VFSs of 20 m by 6 m (66 ft by 20 ft), and a trapezoidal swale with 3:1 side slopes (0.15 m [0.5 ft] bottom width and 10.4 m [34 ft] long) were constructed. One VFS of each size was amended with a mixture of sand and ViroPhos, a proprietary phosphorus (P) sorptive aggregate. Hydrologic data were collected for rainfall events during the 11-month sampling period. Influent and effluent samples were collected from select rainfall events and analyzed for concentrations of nitrogen (N) and P species, total suspended solids (TSS), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn).

Significant runoff volume reductions averaging 36%, 59%, 42%, 57%, and 23% were found for the small and large unamended VFSs, the small and large amended VFSs, and the swale, respectively (n = 30). In general, concentrations of total nitrogen (TN) and TSS were reduced, while total phosphorus (TP) increased in nearly all treatments. The reductions in TN concentrations were significant in the amended VFSs and the swale, and TN was found to be irreducible at influent concentrations <1 mg L−1 (<1 ppm). TN load reductions in all treatments exceeded the 30% reduction credit assigned by NC, while only the amended VFSs and the swale exceeded the 35% load reduction credit assigned for TP.TN and TP load reductions were not significantly different between the VFSs and the swale. All treatments exceeded 75% TSS load reduction, far exceeding the 40% TSS removal credit that these systems receive in NC. In general, swale and VFS performance was similar in terms of TN and TP load reduction, while the VFSs significantly outperformed the swale in average volume and TSS load reduction.

  • © 2013 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 68 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 68, Issue 1
January/February 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Side-by-side evaluation of four level spreader–vegetated filter strips and a swale in eastern North Carolina
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Side-by-side evaluation of four level spreader–vegetated filter strips and a swale in eastern North Carolina
E.M.P. Knight, W.F. Hunt, R.J. Winston
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2013, 68 (1) 60-72; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.1.60

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Side-by-side evaluation of four level spreader–vegetated filter strips and a swale in eastern North Carolina
E.M.P. Knight, W.F. Hunt, R.J. Winston
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2013, 68 (1) 60-72; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.1.60
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Agronomic and environmental performance of dairy farms in a warmer, wetter climate
  • Runoff nutrient losses from tall fescue pastures varying in endophyte association, fertilization, and harvest management
  • Why do farmers care about rented land? Investigating the context of farmland tenure
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2021 Soil and Water Conservation Society