Farmers and conservation programs: Explaining differences in Environmental Quality Incentives Program applications between states

References

1. 1. Berry W.D.,
   2. Ringquist E.J.,
   3. Fording R.C.,
   4. Hanson R.L.

   . 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-93. American Journal of Political Science 42:327-348.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Brace P.,
   2. Sims-Butler K.,
   3. Arceneaux K.,
   4. Johnson M.

   . 2002. Public opinion in the American states: New perspectives using national survey data. American Journal of Political Science 46(1):173-189.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Claassen R.

   2003. Emphasis shifts in U.S. agri-environmental policy. Amber Waves, USDA Economic Research Service.
4. 1. Constance D.H.,
   2. Rikoon J.S.,
   3. Ma J.C.

   . 1996. Landlord involvement in environmental decision making on rented Missouri cropland: Pesticide use and water quality issues. Rural Sociology 61:577-605.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Crotty P.M.

   1987. The New Federalism game: Primacy implementation of environmental policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 17:53-67.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Dowd B.M.,
   2. Press D.,
   3. Los Huertos M.

   . 2008. Agricultural nonpoint source water pollution policy: The case of California's central coast. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 128:151-161.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Dupont D.P.

   2010. Cost-sharing incentive programs for source water protection: The Grand River's Rural Water Quality Program. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(4):481-496.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Fairweather J.R.,
   2. Campbell H.R.

   . 2003. Environmental beliefs and farm practices of New Zealand farmers: Contrasting pathways to sustainability. Agriculture and Human Values 20:287–300.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Federal Register

   . 2009. Environmental Quality Incentives Program: Interim final rule with request for comment. Federal Register 74(10):2293-2317.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Franks J.

    2003. Revised agri-environment policy objectives: Implications for scheme design. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46(3):443-466.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Gramig B.M.,
    2. Wolf C.A.,
    3. Lupi F.

    . 2010. Understanding adoption of livestock health management practices: The case of bovine leukosis virus. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 58:343-360.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Hays S.P.,
    2. Esler M.,
    3. Hays C.E.

    . 1996. Environmental commitment among the states: Integrating alternative approaches to state environmental policy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 26(2):41-58.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 1. Hoornbeek J.A.

    2004. Runaway bureaucracies or congressional control?: Water pollution policies in the American states. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
14. 1. Jänicke M.

    2005. Trend-setters in environmental policy: The character and role of pioneer countries. European Environment 15:129-142.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Johnson M.,
    2. Brace P.,
    3. Arceneaux K.

    . 2005. Public opinion and dynamic representation in the American states: The case of environmental attitudes. Social Science Quarterly 86(1): 87-108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Knowler D.,
    2. Bradshaw B.

    . 2007. Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32:25-48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Kraft S.E.,
    2. Lant C.,
    3. Gillman K.

    . 1996. WQIP: An assessment of its chances for acceptance by farmers. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 51(6):494-498.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. Lambert D.,
    2. Sullivan P.,
    3. Claassen R.,
    4. Foreman L.

    . 2006. Conservation-compatible practices and programs: Who participates? USDA Economic Research Report #14. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/err14/err14_reportsummary.htm.
19. 1. Lambert D.M.,
    2. Sullivan P.,
    3. Claassen R.,
    4. Foreman L.

    . 2007. Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices. Land Use Policy 24:72-88.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Loftus T.T.,
    2. Kraft S.E.

    . 2003. Enrolling conservation buffers in the CRP. Land Use Policy 20:73-84.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Long J.S.

    1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. 1. Maybery D.,
    2. Crase L.,
    3. Gullifer C.

    . 2005. Categorising farming values as economic, conservation and lifestyle. Journal of Economic Psychology 26:59-72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. McCann E.,
    2. Sullivan S.,
    3. Erickson D.,
    4. De Young R.

    . 1997. Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: A comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environmental Management 21(5):747-758.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 1. Morris C.,
    2. Potter C.

    . 1995. Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 11(1):51–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Napier T.L.

    2009. Grain scarcity: A new era of conservation policies and programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64(1):7A-10A, doi:10.2489/jswc.64.1.7A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
26. 1. Napier T.L.,
    2. Tucker M.,
    3. McCarter S.

    . 2000. Adoption of conservation production systems in three Midwest watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55(2):123-134.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. 1. Newmark A.J.,
    2. Witko C.

    . 2007. Pollution, politics, and preferences for environmental spending in the states. Review of Policy Research 24(4):291-308.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Norrander B.

    2001. Measuring state public opinion with the Senate National Election Study. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1(1):111-125.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 1. Pacheco J.

    2011. Using national surveys to measure dynamic U.S. state public opinion: A guideline for scholars and an application. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(4):415-439.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. 1. Papke L.E.,
    2. Woolridge J.M.

    . 2008. Panel data methods for fractional response variable with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics 145(1-2):121-133.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Petrzelka P.,
    2. Marquart-Pyatt S.

    . 2011. Land tenure in the US: Power, gender, and consequences for conservation decision making. Agriculture and Human Values 28:549-560.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 1. Prokopy L.S.,
    2. Floress K.,
    3. Klotthor-Weinkauf D.,
    4. Baumgart-Getz A.

    . 2008. Determinants of agricultural BMP adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(5):300-311, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Reimer A.P.,
    2. Thompson A.W.,
    3. Prokopy L.S.

    . 2012a. The multidimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: Implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values.
34. 1. Reimer A.P.,
    2. Weinkauf D.K.,
    3. Prokopy L.S.

    . 2012b. The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds. Journal of Rural Studies 28(1):118-128.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Sullivan S.,
    2. McCann E.,
    3. De Young R.,
    4. Erickson D.

    . 1996. Farmers' attitudes about farming and the environment: A survey of conventional and organic farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9(2):123-143.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. Thompson A.W.

    2010. Views of agriculture: Understanding farmers' attitudes to identify strategies for improving rural landscape planning. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.
37. 1. USBEA (US Bureau of Economic Analysis)

    . 2011. GDP & Personal Income. http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=70&step=1&isuri=1&acrdn=1.
38. 1. USDA

    . 2011. Budget summary and annual performance plan. www.obpa.usda.gov/budsum/FY12budsum.pdf.
39. 1. USDA

    . 2009. 2007 U.S. Census of Agriculture: United States Summary and State Data. Volume 1, Part 51. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/usv1.pdf.
40. 1. USDA ARMS (USDA Agricultural Resource Management Survey)

    . 2007. Farm Financial and Crop Production Practices. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/ARMS/.
41. 1. USDA ERS (USDA Economic Research Service)

    . 2010. Farm Resource Regions. http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/arms/resourceregions/resourceregions.htm#older.
42. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2009. Environmental Quality Incentives Program. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/programs/financial/eqip.
43. 1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2011. Water Quality Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Loads Information. http://www.epa.gov/waters/ir/index.html.
44. 1. Warriner G.K.,
    2. Moul T.M.

    . 1992. Kinship and personal communication network influences on the adoption of agricultural conservation technology. Journal of Rural Studies 8(3):279-291.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. 1. Ye X.,
    2. Pendyala R.M.

    . 2005. A model of daily time use allocation using the fractional logit methodology. 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 9-13 2005, Washington, DC. Washington, DC: Transporation Research Board.