Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

The Upper Chester River watershed: Lessons learned from a focused, highly partnered, voluntary approach to conservation

Jennifer Nelson and Paul Spies
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2013, 68 (2) 41A-44A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.2.41A
Jennifer Nelson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Spies
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

The Chesapeake Bay has been the focus of restoration efforts for the past 30 years. The Chesapeake Bay watershed is 168,000 km2 (64,000 mi2) and is shared among six states—Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, and New York—and Washington, DC. In 2009, President Obama issued an Executive Order to Protect and Restore the Chesapeake Bay, outlining specific directives intended to meet water quality goals by 2025. Among other things, it directed the establishment and implementation of the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), often referred to as a “pollution diet,” which sets limits on nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment and divides those loads into individual states and watersheds.

Each of the Chesapeake Bay states developed Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs), detailing how they would meet the TMDLs for the watersheds in their states. The WIPs addressed all of the different sources of pollution that contributed to their nutrient and sediment loads and set specific goals for a set of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would reduce the load to the TMDL levels by 2025. Further, the plans were divided into two-year milestones, so that the states could periodically measure their progress.

The Executive Order strategy also established three showcase watersheds in…

  • © 2013 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 68 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 68, Issue 2
March/April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Upper Chester River watershed: Lessons learned from a focused, highly partnered, voluntary approach to conservation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Upper Chester River watershed: Lessons learned from a focused, highly partnered, voluntary approach to conservation
Jennifer Nelson, Paul Spies
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2013, 68 (2) 41A-44A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.2.41A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Upper Chester River watershed: Lessons learned from a focused, highly partnered, voluntary approach to conservation
Jennifer Nelson, Paul Spies
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2013, 68 (2) 41A-44A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.2.41A
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
  • Climate change impacts on soil, water, and biodiversity conservation
  • The urgent need for action
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Soil science beyond COVID-19
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society