Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Field-scale evaluation of a multislot passive sampler

P.J. Parker and D.L. Busch
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation March 2013, 68 (2) 83-88; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.2.83
P.J. Parker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.L. Busch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Monitoring the quality and quantity of agricultural runoff offers many challenges. Various instruments are available and range in terms of complexity, initial costs, operating costs, and accuracy. This paper describes a low-cost multislot passive sampler (the crown divisor sampler) used to measure runoff from a 0.41 ha (1 ac) field. Similar samplers have been used in laboratory and plot-scale studies, but their accuracy has not been studied in the field. For this study, the crown divisor sampler was placed in series with a calibrated 0.2 m (0.8 ft) HS flume. The accuracy of the sampler was assessed by comparing the runoff volume predicted by the sampler to the known volume measured by the flume for several storm events. A series of tests were also performed in which a simulated storm event was routed through the flume and crown divisor sampler. The flume was acceptably accurate for the simulated storm event tests and for some of the storm events. In addition to the quantitative results, many practical lessons have been learned and are documented in this paper.

  • © 2013 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 68 (2)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 68, Issue 2
March/April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Field-scale evaluation of a multislot passive sampler
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Field-scale evaluation of a multislot passive sampler
P.J. Parker, D.L. Busch
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2013, 68 (2) 83-88; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.2.83

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Field-scale evaluation of a multislot passive sampler
P.J. Parker, D.L. Busch
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Mar 2013, 68 (2) 83-88; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.2.83
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Measuring edge-of-field water quality: Where we have been and the path forward
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Benefits, barriers, and use of cover crops in the western United States: Regional survey results
  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society