Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Evaluation of ammonia emissions from manure incorporated with different soil aerator configurations

T.L. Myers, C.J. Dell and D.B. Beegle
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation July 2013, 68 (4) 306-314; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.4.306
T.L. Myers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.J. Dell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.B. Beegle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The incorporation of swine manure with tillage effectively reduces ammonia (NH3) emissions and conserves crop available nitrogen (N) but is not compatible with no-till and many other conservation tillage programs. Rolling-tine aerators potentially provide a means to enhance manure infiltration with limited disruption of the soil surface; however, the impact of the range of aerator configurations and manure placements has not been widely studied. We measured NH3 emissions, conducted presidedress nitrate (NO3) tests (PSNT), monitored corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield when swine manure was incorporated with combinations of two aerator toolbar offset angles (0° and 10°) and two manure placements (broadcast before aeration and banded behind aerator), and compared those measurements to unincorporated surface application and an unmanured control. Additional plots were established with five rates of mineral N fertilization to determine N response curve and estimate fertilizer N equivalent of the applied manure. Measurement of cumulative NH3 emissions using a dynamic chamber method showed that offsetting the aerator toolbar by 10° reduced emissions by 65% to 75%, with both manure placements, compared to surface application. However, no consistent reductions in NH3 emissions were observed when the toolbar was not offset. While reduction in NH3 with the offset toolbar could conserve substantial amounts of plant available N, the soil disturbance caused by the offset tines would not be compatible with most conservation tillage programs. Presidedress NO3 test values increased when NH3 emissions were reduced. In 2009, both the angled and straight aerator treatments with manure banded behind the aerator resulted in significantly higher corn grain yield than all other treatments despite reductions in NH3 emissions only when the toolbar was angled. Correlation of yield from manure application treatments with the N response curve for multiple mineral N application rates showed a greater than expected response to manure application. Yield responses are an indication that aeration has benefits in addition to N conservation. We do not recommend the rolling-tine aerator if reducing NH3 emissions in conservation tillage is the primary goal, but future study into other yield-increasing benefits of aeration is needed.

  • © 2013 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 68 (4)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 68, Issue 4
July/August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of ammonia emissions from manure incorporated with different soil aerator configurations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of ammonia emissions from manure incorporated with different soil aerator configurations
T.L. Myers, C.J. Dell, D.B. Beegle
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2013, 68 (4) 306-314; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.4.306

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Evaluation of ammonia emissions from manure incorporated with different soil aerator configurations
T.L. Myers, C.J. Dell, D.B. Beegle
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2013, 68 (4) 306-314; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.68.4.306
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society