Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico and effects of cropland conservation

M.J. White, C. Santhi, N. Kannan, J.G. Arnold, D. Harmel, L. Norfleet, P. Allen, M. DiLuzio, X. Wang, J. Atwood, E. Haney and M. Vaughn Johnson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2014, 69 (1) 26-40; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.1.26
M.J. White
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Santhi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Kannan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.G. Arnold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Harmel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Norfleet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Allen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. DiLuzio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Atwood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Haney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Vaughn Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Alexander R.
    1998. Documentation for county point source file US Geological Survey. http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sparrow/wrr97/point/point.html.
    1. Alexander R.B.,
    2. Smith R.A.,
    3. Schwarz G.E.,
    4. Boyer E.W.,
    5. Nolan J.V.,
    6. Brakebill J.W.
    . 2008. Differences in P and N delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Environmental Science and Technology 42(3):822-30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Anning D.W.
    2011. Modeled sources, transport, and accumulation of dissolved solids in water resources of the southwestern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47(5):1087-1109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Arnold J.G.,
    2. Williams J.R.,
    3. Maidment D.R.
    . 1995. Continuous-time water and sediment-routing model for large basins. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 121:171-183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
    1. Arnold J.G.,
    2. Srinivasan R.,
    3. Muttiah R.S.,
    4. Williams J.R.
    . 1998. Large area hydrologic model development and assessment, Part 1: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1)73-89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Arnold J.,
    2. Chinnasamy S.,
    3. Di Luzio M.,
    4. Haney E. B.,
    5. Kannan N.,
    6. White M.
    . 2010. The HUMUS/SWAT National Water Quality Modeling System. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1042103.pdf.
    1. Atwood J.,
    2. Moffitt D.,
    3. Norfleet L.,
    4. King A.,
    5. Lemunyon J.
    . 2009. Transforming Survey Data to APEX Model Input Files. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_013053.pdf
    1. Benaman J.,
    2. Shoemaker C.,
    3. Haith D.
    . 2005. Calibration and validation of Soil and Water Assessment Tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10(5):363–374.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
    1. Brown L.C.,
    2. Barnwell T.O. Jr..
    1987. The enhanced water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS documentation and user manual. EPA document #EPA/600/3-87/007, Cooperative Agreement #811883. Athens, GA: Environmental Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency. Athens, GA.
    1. Di Luzio M.,
    2. Johnson G. L.,
    3. Daly C.,
    4. Eischeid J.,
    5. Arnold J.G.
    . 2008. Constructing retrospective gridded daily precipitation and temperature datasets for the conterminous United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 47(2):475-497.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
    2. Srinivasan R.,
    3. Arnold J.G.
    . 2010. Soil and Water Assessment tool (SWAT) model: Current developments and applications. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 53(5):1423-1431.
    OpenUrl
    1. García A.M.,
    2. Hoos A.B.,
    3. Terziotti S.
    . 2011. A regional modeling framework of P sources and transport in streams of the southeastern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47(5):991-1010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Garen D.C.,
    2. Moore D.S.
    . 2005. Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: Uses, abuses and future directions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(2):377-388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Reyes M.R.,
    3. Green C.H.,
    4. Arnold J.G.
    . 2007. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications and future research directions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(4):1211-1250.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Williams J.R.,
    3. Wang X.,
    4. Saleh A.,
    5. Osei E.,
    6. Hauck L.,
    7. Izaurralde C.,
    8. Flowers J.
    . 2010. The Agricultural Policy/Environmental Extender (APEX) model: An emerging tool for landscape and watershed environmental analyses. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 53(3):711-740.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gebert W.A.,
    2. Graczyk D.J.,
    3. Krug W.R.
    . 1987. Annual average runoff in the United States, 1951–1980. US Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas. HA-710, 1 sheet, scale 1:7,500,000.
    1. Goebel J.
    2009. Statistical Methodology for the NRI-CEAP Cropland Survey. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_013402.pdf.
    1. Goolsby D.,
    2. Battaglin W.,
    3. Lawrence G.,
    4. Artz R.,
    5. Aulenbach B.,
    6. Hooper R.,
    7. Keeney D.,
    8. Stensland G.
    . 1999. Flux and sources of nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin. Topic 3, report for the integrated assessment on hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Coastal Ocean Program. http://ny.water.usgs.gov/pubs/jrn/Lawrence.1999.CENRreport.pdf.
    1. Harmel D.,
    2. Potter S.,
    3. Ellis P.,
    4. Reckhow K.,
    5. Green C.,
    6. Haney R.
    . 2006. Compilation of measured nutrient load data for agricultural land uses in the United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42:1163-1178.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Homer C.,
    2. Dewitz J.,
    3. Fry J.,
    4. M. Coan M.,
    5. Hossain N.,
    6. Larson C.,
    7. Herold N.,
    8. McKerrow A.,
    9. VanDriel J.N.,
    10. Wickham J.
    . 2007. Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 73(4)337-341.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Kannan N.,
    2. Santhi C.,
    3. Arnold J.G.
    . 2008. Development of an automated procedure for estimation of the spatial variation of runoff in large river basins. Journal of Hydrology 359:1-15.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kannan N.,
    2. Chinnasamy S.,
    3. White M.,
    4. Wang X.,
    5. Arnold J.,
    6. Di Luzio M.
    . 2011. Documentation on calibration and validation of CEAP-HUMUS for various River Basins in the United States.http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044544.pdf.
    1. Knisel W.G.
    1980. CREAMS: A field scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems. Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration.
    1. Kellogg R.,
    2. Moffitt S.
    . 2011. Manure loadings used to simulate pastureland and hay land in CEAP HUMUS/SWAT modeling. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1045979.pdf.
    1. Kleijnen J.P.C.
    1995. Verification and validation of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research 82:145-162.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Leonard R.,
    2. Knisel W.,
    3. Still D.
    . 1987. GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 30:1403-1418.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. MART
    , 2006. Reassessment of point source nutrient mass loadings to the Mississippi River Basin. US Environmental Protection Agency, Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force, Management Action Reassessment Team, 31 p. http://water.epa.gov/type/watersheds/named/msbasin/upload/2006_12_8_msbasin_MART.pdf.
    1. Mausbach M.J.,
    2. Dedrick A.R.
    . 2004. The length we go: Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(5):96-103.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mednick A. C.
    2010. Does soil data resolution matter? State Soil Geographic database versus Soil Survey Geographic database in rainfall-runoff modeling across Wisconsin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(3): 190-199, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.3.190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Minitab
    (2010). [Computer software]. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc. http://www.minitab.com.
    1. Monke J.,
    2. Johnson R.
    . 2010. What is the Farm Bill? Congressional Research Service. RS22131. http://www.aae.wisc.edu/aae215/ppt/crc_dec_2010_2.pdf.
    1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Van Liew M.W.,
    4. Bingner R.L.,
    5. R.D. Harmel R.D.,
    6. Veith T.L.
    . 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3):885-900.
    OpenUrl
    1. Nash J. E.,
    2. Sutcliffe J. V.
    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrolology 10(3): 282-290.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Plotkin S.,
    2. Potter T.,
    3. Bosch D.,
    4. Bagdon J.,
    5. Hesketh E.
    . 2009. I_APEX calibration and validation using research plots in Tifton, GA http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_013180.pdf.
    1. Radcliffe D. E.,
    2. Freer J.,
    3. Schoumans O.
    . 2009. Diffuse phosphorus models in the United States and Europe: Their usages, scales, and uncertainties. Journal of Environmental Quality 38:1956-1967.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rebich R.A.,
    2. Houston N.A.,
    3. Mize S.V.,
    4. Pearson D.K.,
    5. Ging P.B.,
    6. Hornig C.E.
    . 2011. Sources and delivery of nutrients to the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico from streams in the South-Central United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47(5):1061-1086.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Reckhow K.H.
    1994. Water quality simulation modeling and uncertainty analysis for risk assessment and decision making. Ecological Modeling 72:1-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Robertson D.M.,
    2. Schwarz G.E.,
    3. Saad D.A.,
    4. Alexander R.B.
    . 2009. Incorporating uncertainty into the ranking of SPARROW model nutrient yields from Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45(2):534–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Runkel R.L.,
    2. Crawford C.G.,
    3. Cohn T.A.
    . 2004. Load Estimator (LOADEST): A FORTRAN program for estimating constituent loads in streams and rivers, US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods.ook 4, Chapter A5.
    1. Saad D. A.,
    2. Schwarz G. E.,
    3. Robertson D.M.,
    4. Booth N. L.
    . 2011. A multi-agency nutrient dataset used to estimate loads, improve monitoring design, and calibrate regional nutrient SPARROW models. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47(5):933-949, doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688. 2011.00575.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Saleh A.,
    2. Gassman P.W.,
    3. Abraham J.,
    4. Rodecap J.
    . 2003. Application of SWAT and APEX models for the upper Maquoketa River watershed in northeast Iowa. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Paper No. 032063. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
    1. McFarland A.,
    2. Saleh A.
    1. Saleh A.,
    2. Gallego O.
    . 2007. Application of SWAT and APEX models using SWAPP for the upper North Bosque River watershed in Texas. In Proc. 4th Conf. Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and TMDLs,eds. McFarland A., Saleh A., 458-468. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Publication No. 701P0207. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
    1. Santhi C.,
    2. Allen P.M.,
    3. Muttiah R.S.,
    4. Arnold J.G.,
    5. Tuppad P.
    . 2008. Regional estimation of base flow for the conterminous United States by hydrologic landscape regions. Journal of Hydrology 351(1-2)139-153.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Santhi C.,
    2. Kannan N.,
    3. White M.,
    4. Di Luzio M.,
    5. Arnold J.G.,
    6. Wang X.,
    7. Williams J.R.
    . 2012. An integrated modeling approach for estimating the water quality benefits of conservation practices at river basin scale. Journal of Environmental Quality doi: 0.2134/jeq2011.0460.
    1. Smith R.A.,
    2. Schwarz G.E.,
    3. Alexander R.B.
    . 1997. Regional interpretation of water-quality monitoring data. Water Resources Research. 33(12) 2781-2798.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Srinivasan R.,
    2. Arnold J.,
    3. Jones C.
    . 1998. Hydrologic modeling of the United States with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. International Journal of Water Resources Development 14(3):315-325.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Tetra Tech.
    1998. Documentation of phase I and phase II activities in support of point source nutrient loading analysis in the Mississippi River system: Prepared for USEPA Nonpoint-source Control Branch, contract no. 68-C7-0014, Washington, DC.
    1. Tuppad P.,
    2. Douglas-Mankin K.R.,
    3. Lee T.,
    4. Srinivasan R.,
    5. Arnold J.G.
    . 2011. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrologic/water quality model: Extended capability and wider adoption. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 54(5):1677-1684.
    OpenUrl
    1. USACE (Army Corps of Engineers)
    . 2009 National Inventory of Dams (NID), EP 360-1-23, July 2010.
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 1992. State soil geographic database (STATSGO) data users' guide. Publication 1492. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2010. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Conservation Effects Assessment pProject (CEAP) cultivated cropland in the Upper Mississippi River Basin.http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1042093.pdf.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2011. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Cultivated Cropland in the Ohio-Tennessee River Basin. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1046342.pdf.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2012. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Cultivated Cropland in the Missouri River Basin. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1048710.pdf.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2012. National Soil Information System. National Soil Survey Center. Lincoln, NE. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/nasis/.
    1. USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2007. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. An update by the EPA science advisory board. EPA-SAB-08-003. http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/C3D2F27094E03F90852573B800601D93/$File/EPA-SAB-08-003complete.unsigned.pdf.
    1. USGS (US Geological Survey)
    . 1994. 1:250,000-scale hydrologic units of the United States. USGS Open-File Rep. 94-0236. http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/huc250k.xml
    1. USGS
    . 2003. Hydrologic landscape regions of the United States. USGS Open-File Rep. 03-145. http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/hlrus.xmlUSDA
    1. Wang X.,
    2. Kannan N.,
    3. Santhi C.,
    4. Potter S.R.,
    5. Williams J.R.,
    6. Arnold J.G.
    . 2011a. Integrating APEX output for cultivated cropland with SWAT simulation for regional modeling. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 54(4):1281-1298.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wang X.,
    2. Williams J.,
    3. Atwood J.,
    4. Norfleet L.,
    5. King A.
    . 2011b. APEX model upgrades, data inputs, and parameter settings for use in CEAP cropland modeling. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs143_012924.pdf.
    1. White M.,
    2. Harmel D.,
    3. Arnold J.,
    4. Williams J.
    . 2012. SWAT check: a screening tool to assist users in the identification of potential model application problems. Journal of Environmental Quality (in Press).
    1. Williams J.R.,
    2. Nicks A.D.,
    3. Arnold J.G.
    . 1985. Simulator for water resources in rural basins. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 111: 970-986.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Singh V. P.,
    2. Frevert D. K.
    1. Williams J.R.,
    2. Izaurralde R.C.
    . 2006. The APEX model. In Watershed Models. eds. Singh V. P., Frevert D. K., 437-482. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    1. Williams J.,
    2. Potter S.,
    3. Wang X.,
    4. Atwood J.,
    5. Norfleet L.,
    6. Gerik T.,
    7. Lemunyon J.,
    8. King A.,
    9. Steglich E.,
    10. Wang C.,
    11. Pitts T.,
    12. Meinardus A.
    . 2010. APEX model validation for CEAP. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1042102.pdf.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 69 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 69, Issue 1
January/February 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico and effects of cropland conservation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
20 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico and effects of cropland conservation
M.J. White, C. Santhi, N. Kannan, J.G. Arnold, D. Harmel, L. Norfleet, P. Allen, M. DiLuzio, X. Wang, J. Atwood, E. Haney, M. Vaughn Johnson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2014, 69 (1) 26-40; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.69.1.26

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico and effects of cropland conservation
M.J. White, C. Santhi, N. Kannan, J.G. Arnold, D. Harmel, L. Norfleet, P. Allen, M. DiLuzio, X. Wang, J. Atwood, E. Haney, M. Vaughn Johnson
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2014, 69 (1) 26-40; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.69.1.26
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development of a novel framework for modeling field-scale conservation effects of depressional wetlands in agricultural landscapes
  • Development of Agricultural Conservation Reduction Estimator (ACRE), a simple field-scale conservation planning and evaluation tool
  • Identification and classification of critical soil and water conservation areas in the Muskingum River basin in Ohio
  • Measuring edge-of-field water quality: Where we have been and the path forward
  • The utilization of edge-of-field monitoring of agricultural runoff in addressing nonpoint source pollution
  • Assessing edge-of-field nutrient runoff from agricultural lands in the United States: How clean is clean enough?
  • Estimating sediment and nutrient delivery ratios in the Big Sunflower Watershed using a multiple linear regression model
  • Improving the Efficiency of Voluntary Water Quality Conservation Programs
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society