A spreadsheet planning tool for assisting a state agency with cost-effective watershed scale surface water nitrogen planning

REFERENCES

1. 1. Babbar-Sebens M.,
   2. Mukhopadhyay S.

   . 2013. Watershed REstoration using Spatio-Temporal Optimization of REsources (WRESTORE), vol. 2013. http://wrestore.iupui.edu/.
2. 1. Betts L.

   2013. The nitrogen conundrum. Corn and Soybean Digest, August, 2013.
3. 1. Bierman P.,
   2. Rosen C.,
   3. Venterea R.,
   4. Lamb J.

   . 2011. Survey of nitrogen fertilizer use on corn in Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: Department of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, and USDA Agricultural Research Service.
4. 1. Davenport M.A.,
   2. Olson B.

   . 2012. Nitrogen Use and Determinants of Best Management Practices: A Study of Rush River and Elm Creek. Agricultural Producers Final Report, submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as part of a comprehensive report on nitrogen in Minnesota surface waters. St. Paul, MN: Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota.
5. 1. Devereux O.,
   2. Rigelman J.

   (Undated). Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool. www.casttool.org.
6. 1. Fabrizzi K.,
   2. Mulla D.

   . 2012. Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for Reductions in Nitrate Losses to Surface Waters in Midwestern U.S. Agriculture. Report submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as part of a comprehensive report on nitrogen in Minnesota surface waters. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.
7. 1. Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship,
   2. Iowa Department of Natural Resources, and Iowa State University

   . 2013. Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: A Science and Technology-Based Framework to Assess and Reduce Nutrients to Iowa Waters and the Gulf of Mexico. http://www.nutrientstrategy.iastate.edu/documents.
8. 1. Lazarus W.F.,
   2. Kramer G.,
   3. Mulla D.J.,
   4. Wall D.

   . 2013. Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool (NBMP.xlsm) for Comparing the Economics of Practices to Reduce Watershed Nitrogen Loads. http://faculty.apec.umn.edu/wlazarus/documents/nbmp_overview.pdf.
9. 1. Mamo M.,
   2. Ginting D.,
   3. Schoengold K.,
   4. Wortmann C.S.

   . 2009. Soil-Erosion Economic Decision Support Tool (SEE-DST) For Land Management in Nebraska, EC-169. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Extension.
10. 1. MPCA

    . 2013. Nitrogen in Minnesota Surface Waters: Conditions, Trends, Sources, and Reductions. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=19622.
11. 1. Mulla D.J.,
    2. Galzki J.,
    3. Fabrizzi K.,
    4. Kim K.-I.,
    5. Wall D.

    . 2013. D4. Nonpoint Source Nitrogen Loading, Sources, and Pathways for Minnesota Surface Waters. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
12. 1. Mulla D.J.,
    2. Wall D.,
    3. Galzki J.,
    4. Fabrizzi K.,
    5. Kim K.-I.

    . 2012. Nonpoint Source Nitrogen Loading, Sources and Pathways for Minnesota Surface Waters. Report submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as part of a comprehensive report on nitrogen in Minnesota surface waters. St. Paul, MN: Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota.
13. 1. Texas A&M University

    . 20135. APEX Agricultural Policy Environmental Extender. http://apex.tamu.edu/.
14. 1. Texas A&M University

    . 2013. SWAT Soil and Water Assessment Tool. http://swat.tamu.edu/.
15. 1. USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Science Advisory Board

    . 2007. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: An Update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. http://water.epa.gov/type/watersheds/named/msbasin/upload/2008_1_31_msbasin_sab_report_2007.pdf.
16. 1. Williams J.R.,
    2. Smith C.M.,
    3. Leatherman J.D.R.C.,
    4. Wilson R.M.

    . 2012. Engaging watershed stakeholders for cost-effective environmental management planning with “Watershed Manager.” Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 41(2012):44-53.

    OpenUrl