Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

So you need a social monitoring plan: Now what?

Tricia G. Knoot, GL Drake Larsen and Lisa A. Schulte
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2014, 69 (3) 84A-88A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.3.84A
Tricia G. Knoot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GL Drake Larsen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa A. Schulte
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Armitage D.R.,
    2. Plummer R.,
    3. Berkes F.,
    4. Arthur R.I.,
    5. Charles A.T.,
    6. Davidson-Hunt I.J.,
    7. Diduck A.P.,
    8. Doubleday N.C.,
    9. Johnson D.S.,
    10. Marschke M.,
    11. McConney P.,
    12. Pinkerton E.W.,
    13. Wollenberg E.K.
    . 2009. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(2):95-102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Atwell R.C.,
    2. Schulte L.A.,
    3. Westphal L.M.
    . 2010. How to build multifunctional agricultural landscapes in the US Corn Belt: Add perennials and partnerships. Land Use Policy 27(4):1082-1090.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Chess C.,
    2. Hance B.J.,
    3. Gibson G.
    . 2000. Adaptive participation in watershed management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55(3):248-252.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Dillman D.,
    2. Smyth J.,
    3. Christain L.
    2008. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    1. Genskow K.,
    2. Prokopy L.S.
    . 2010. Lessons learned in developing social indicators for regional water quality management. Society and Natural Resources 23(1):83-91.
    OpenUrl
    1. Genskow K.,
    2. Prokopy L.
    (eds.). 2011. The Social Indicator Planning and Evaluation System (SIPES) for Nonpoint Source Management: A Handbook for Watershed Projects. 3rd Edition. Great Lakes Regional Water Program. http://35.8.121.111/si/Info/pdfs/SI_Handbook_v4_02012012.pdf.
    1. Low S.,
    2. Randhir T.
    . 2005. Watershed management, structural characteristics, information processing, and cooperative strategies in conservation organizations. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):281-287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pahl-Wostl C.
    2006. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 11(1):10.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pahl-Wostl C.,
    2. Craps M.,
    3. Dewulf A.,
    4. Mostert E.,
    5. Tabara D.,
    6. Taillieu T.
    . 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12(2):5.
    OpenUrl
    1. Stufflebeam D.L.,
    2. Madaus G.F.,
    3. Kellaghan T.
    1. Patton M.Q.
    2000. Utilization-focused Evaluation. In Evaluation Models, Stufflebeam D.L., Madaus G.F., Kellaghan T., eds., 425-438. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
    1. Patton M.Q.
    2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    1. Plummer R.,
    2. Armitage D.
    . 2007. A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics 61:62-74.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Plummer J.,
    2. Cook B.,
    3. Diforio D.,
    4. Schachter B.,
    5. Sokolyanskaya I.,
    6. Korde T.
    . 2007. Measures of Engagement, Volume II. New York: Advertising Research Foundation. http://www.classmatandread.net/class/2.Measures%20of%20Engagement.pdf.
    1. Prokopy L.S.
    2011. Agricultural human dimensions research: The role of qualitative research methods. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 66(1):9A-12A, doi:10.2489/jswc.66.1.9A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Stem C.,
    2. Margoluis R.,
    3. Salafsky N.,
    4. Brown M.
    . 2005. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: A review of trends and approaches. Conservation Biology 19(2):295-309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Stufflebeam D.
    2001. Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation 89:7-98.
    OpenUrl
    1. Taylor-Powell,
    2. Steele S.,
    3. Douglah M.
    . 1996. G3658-1, Program Development and Evaluation: Planning a Program Evaluation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension.
    1. Wagner M.M.
    2005. Watershed-scale social assessment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(4):177-186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wenger E.
    1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 69 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 69, Issue 3
May/June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
So you need a social monitoring plan: Now what?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
So you need a social monitoring plan: Now what?
Tricia G. Knoot, GL Drake Larsen, Lisa A. Schulte
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2014, 69 (3) 84A-88A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.69.3.84A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
So you need a social monitoring plan: Now what?
Tricia G. Knoot, GL Drake Larsen, Lisa A. Schulte
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2014, 69 (3) 84A-88A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.69.3.84A
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Agriculture in the North Western Sahara Aquifer System: A miracle in the making?
  • A vision for integrated, collaborative solutions to critical water and food challenges
  • Progress in soil erosion research: A European perspective
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society