So you need a social monitoring plan: Now what?

REFERENCES

1. 1. Armitage D.R.,
   2. Plummer R.,
   3. Berkes F.,
   4. Arthur R.I.,
   5. Charles A.T.,
   6. Davidson-Hunt I.J.,
   7. Diduck A.P.,
   8. Doubleday N.C.,
   9. Johnson D.S.,
   10. Marschke M.,
   11. McConney P.,
   12. Pinkerton E.W.,
   13. Wollenberg E.K.

   . 2009. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(2):95-102.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Atwell R.C.,
   2. Schulte L.A.,
   3. Westphal L.M.

   . 2010. How to build multifunctional agricultural landscapes in the US Corn Belt: Add perennials and partnerships. Land Use Policy 27(4):1082-1090.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Chess C.,
   2. Hance B.J.,
   3. Gibson G.

   . 2000. Adaptive participation in watershed management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 55(3):248-252.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 1. Dillman D.,
   2. Smyth J.,
   3. Christain L.

   2008. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5. 1. Genskow K.,
   2. Prokopy L.S.

   . 2010. Lessons learned in developing social indicators for regional water quality management. Society and Natural Resources 23(1):83-91.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Genskow K.,
   2. Prokopy L.

   (eds.). 2011. The Social Indicator Planning and Evaluation System (SIPES) for Nonpoint Source Management: A Handbook for Watershed Projects. 3rd Edition. Great Lakes Regional Water Program. http://35.8.121.111/si/Info/pdfs/SI_Handbook_v4_02012012.pdf.
7. 1. Low S.,
   2. Randhir T.

   . 2005. Watershed management, structural characteristics, information processing, and cooperative strategies in conservation organizations. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):281-287.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 1. Pahl-Wostl C.

   2006. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 11(1):10.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Pahl-Wostl C.,
   2. Craps M.,
   3. Dewulf A.,
   4. Mostert E.,
   5. Tabara D.,
   6. Taillieu T.

   . 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society 12(2):5.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Stufflebeam D.L.,
    2. Madaus G.F.,
    3. Kellaghan T.

    1. Patton M.Q.

    2000. Utilization-focused Evaluation. In Evaluation Models, Stufflebeam D.L., Madaus G.F., Kellaghan T., eds., 425-438. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
11. 1. Patton M.Q.

    2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. 1. Plummer R.,
    2. Armitage D.

    . 2007. A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics 61:62-74.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Plummer J.,
    2. Cook B.,
    3. Diforio D.,
    4. Schachter B.,
    5. Sokolyanskaya I.,
    6. Korde T.

    . 2007. Measures of Engagement, Volume II. New York: Advertising Research Foundation. http://www.classmatandread.net/class/2.Measures%20of%20Engagement.pdf.
14. 1. Prokopy L.S.

    2011. Agricultural human dimensions research: The role of qualitative research methods. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 66(1):9A-12A, doi:10.2489/jswc.66.1.9A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
15. 1. Stem C.,
    2. Margoluis R.,
    3. Salafsky N.,
    4. Brown M.

    . 2005. Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: A review of trends and approaches. Conservation Biology 19(2):295-309.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Stufflebeam D.

    2001. Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation 89:7-98.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Taylor-Powell,
    2. Steele S.,
    3. Douglah M.

    . 1996. G3658-1, Program Development and Evaluation: Planning a Program Evaluation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension.
18. 1. Wagner M.M.

    2005. Watershed-scale social assessment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(4):177-186.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 1. Wenger E.

    1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.