Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

Profitability versus environmental performance: Are they competing?

David Muth
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2014, 69 (6) 203A-206A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.6.203A
David Muth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Excerpt

There is a common perception that environmentally sustainable management practices are competitive with profitability in primary Corn Belt production systems. Sustainable conservation practices in many cases (1) utilize land resources that could be producing commodities and (2) require financial inputs often with limited direct financial returns (USDA NRCS 2014a; Pannell et al. 2006). Furthermore, land tenure dynamics and high costs of production often make near-term financial returns the critical decision point for today's independent farming businesses. These characteristics of our current production systems can lead to conflict between environmental and financial performance. However, we believe that emerging precision agriculture technologies, specifically the ability to make decisions and implement management practices at a smaller spatial scale, provide opportunities for simultaneously improving environmental and financial performance of primary Corn Belt production systems. The first step toward this goal is understanding how subfield variability impacts both environmental and economic performance. The following discussion uses a case study example to show how emerging precision data are helping us quantify subfield variability in our systems. The example is then used to quantify environmental and financial performance at a 10 m (33 ft) resolution scale for the field. The results demonstrate how focusing on increased profitability,…

  • © 2014 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 69 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 69, Issue 6
November/December 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Profitability versus environmental performance: Are they competing?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Profitability versus environmental performance: Are they competing?
David Muth
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2014, 69 (6) 203A-206A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.69.6.203A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Profitability versus environmental performance: Are they competing?
David Muth
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2014, 69 (6) 203A-206A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.69.6.203A
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development of integrated bioenergy production systems using precision conservation and multicriteria decision analysis techniques
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Flooding: Management and risk mitigation
  • Twenty years of conservation effects assessment in the St. Joseph River watershed, Indiana
  • Developing cover crop systems for California almonds: Current knowledge and uncertainties
Show more A Section

Viewpoint

  • Flooding: Management and risk mitigation
  • Sustaining soil for advancing peace: World is one family
  • Conservation programs to reduce greenhouse gases
Show more Viewpoint

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society