Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Biofuel feedstock production potential in stream buffers of the inland Pacific Northwest: Productivity and management issues with invasive plants

J.D. Williams, D.S. Robertson and S.B. Wuest
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2015, 70 (3) 156-169; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.3.156
J.D. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.S. Robertson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.B. Wuest
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Stream buffers increase the complexity of agroecosystems, providing wildlife habitat, sediment and nutrient sinks to improve water quality, and potentially lignocellulosic feedstock for biofuels. The establishment of stream buffers can be difficult, with weeds competing with desired species and increasing weed pressure in the production fields and contaminating feedstocks. Our objective was to evaluate the success of establishing two different feedstock alternatives, alfalfa (ALF; Medicago sativa L., cultivar Ladak) and tall wheatgrass (TWG; Agropyron elongatum Podp., cultivar Alkar), plus a mix of alfalfa and tall wheatgrass (MIX) at two sites within each of three precipitation zones in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). We evaluated productivity, stand establishment, and weed infestation using a split plot, randomized complete block design. Establishment of targeted species was most successful and productivity was highest in the intermediate precipitation zone. Lignocellulosic feedstock produced by TWG (7.52 ± 2.07 Mg ha−1 [3.35 ± 0.92 tn ac−1]) and MIX (7.45 ± 2.00 Mg ha−1 [3.32 ± 0.89 tn ac−1]) produced significantly more lignocellulosic feedstock than ALF (1.68 ± 0.79 Mg ha−1 [0.75 ± 0.35 tn ac−1]) and SG (2.62 ± 0.99 Mg ha−1 [1.17 ± 0.44 tn ac−1]). The best competition against invasive annual species was obtained in the TWG and MIX treatments, with tall wheatgrass providing the bulk of biomass in either treatment. Productivity was acceptable where naturally occurring subirrigation was present and contributed to crop germination and establishment in the low precipitation zone, but weed pressure was substantial and caused near to complete crop failure in the driest plots. A high level of weed management will be required to produce monocultures of lignocellulosic feedstocks in stream buffers.

  • © 2015 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 70 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 70, Issue 3
May/June 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biofuel feedstock production potential in stream buffers of the inland Pacific Northwest: Productivity and management issues with invasive plants
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Biofuel feedstock production potential in stream buffers of the inland Pacific Northwest: Productivity and management issues with invasive plants
J.D. Williams, D.S. Robertson, S.B. Wuest
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2015, 70 (3) 156-169; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.3.156

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Biofuel feedstock production potential in stream buffers of the inland Pacific Northwest: Productivity and management issues with invasive plants
J.D. Williams, D.S. Robertson, S.B. Wuest
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2015, 70 (3) 156-169; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.3.156
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phytoremediation and high rainfall combine to improve soil and plant health in a North America Northern Great Plains saline sodic soil
  • Combining a saltation impact sensor and a wind tunnel to explore wind erosion processes–A case study in the Zhundong mining area, Xinjiang, China
  • Management of nutrient export from diffuse sources in watersheds for environmental protection under uncertainty
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society