Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Conservation effects on soil quality indicators in the Missouri Salt River Basin

K.S. Veum, R.J. Kremer, K.A. Sudduth, N.R. Kitchen, R.N. Lerch, C. Baffaut, D.E. Stott, D.L. Karlen and E.J. Sadler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation July 2015, 70 (4) 232-246; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.4.232
K.S. Veum
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.J. Kremer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.A. Sudduth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N.R. Kitchen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.N. Lerch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Baffaut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.E. Stott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.L. Karlen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.J. Sadler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) was initiated in 2002 to quantify the potential benefits of conservation management practices throughout the nation. Within the Central Claypan Region of Missouri, the Salt River Basin was selected as a benchmark watershed for soil and water quality assessments. This study focuses on two objectives: (1) assessing soil quality for 15 different annual cropping and perennial vegetation systems typically employed in this region, and (2) evaluating relationships among multiple measured soil quality indicators (SQIs). Management practices included annual versus perennial vegetation, and varying grass species composition (cool-season versus warm-season), tillage intensity (no-till versus mulch-till), biomass removal, rotation phase, crop rotation (corn [Zea mays L.]–soybean [Glycine max L. Merr] versus corn–soybean–wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]) and incorporation of cover crops into the rotation. Soil samples were obtained in 2008 from 0 to 5 cm (0 to 2 in) and 5 to 15 cm (2 to 6 in) depth layers. Ten biological, physical, chemical, and nutrient SQIs were measured and scored using the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF). Across SQIs, biological and physical indicators were the most sensitive to management effects, reflecting significant differences in organic carbon (C), mineralizable nitrogen (N), β-glucosidase, and bulk density. In the 0 to 5 cm layer, perennial systems demonstrated the greatest SMAF scores, ranging from 93% to 97% of the soil's inherent potential. Scores for annual cropping systems ranged from 78% to 92%: diversified no-till, corn–soybean–wheat rotation with cover crops (92%) > no-till, corn–soybean rotation without cover crops (88%) > mulch-till corn–soybean rotation without cover crops (84%). Conversely, in the 5 to 15 cm layer, no-till cropping systems scored lower for overall soil function (58% to 61%) than mulch-till systems (65% to 66%). In the 0 to 5 cm layer, biological soil quality under the diversified no-till system with cover crops was 11% greater than under no-till without cover crops, and 20% greater than under mulch-till without cover crops. The effect of rotation phase was primarily reflected in 64% lower mineralizable N following corn relative to soybean. Additionally, soil nutrient function was significantly affected by biomass removal. The results of this study demonstrate that the benefits of conservation management practices extend beyond soil erosion reduction and improved water quality by highlighting the potential for enhanced soil quality, especially biological soil function. In particular, implementing conservation management practices on marginal and degraded soils in the claypan region can enhance long-term sustainability in annual cropping systems and working grasslands through improved soil quality.

  • © 2015 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 70 (4)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 70, Issue 4
July/August 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Conservation effects on soil quality indicators in the Missouri Salt River Basin
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Conservation effects on soil quality indicators in the Missouri Salt River Basin
K.S. Veum, R.J. Kremer, K.A. Sudduth, N.R. Kitchen, R.N. Lerch, C. Baffaut, D.E. Stott, D.L. Karlen, E.J. Sadler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2015, 70 (4) 232-246; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.4.232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Conservation effects on soil quality indicators in the Missouri Salt River Basin
K.S. Veum, R.J. Kremer, K.A. Sudduth, N.R. Kitchen, R.N. Lerch, C. Baffaut, D.E. Stott, D.L. Karlen, E.J. Sadler
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2015, 70 (4) 232-246; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.4.232
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effects of combined conservation practices on soil and water quality in the Central Mississippi River Basin
  • On-farm soil health evaluations: Challenges and opportunities
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing Soil Vulnerability Index classification with respect to rainfall characteristics
  • Trade-off analysis of water conservation and water consumption of typical ecosystems at different climatic scales in the Dongjiang River basin, China
  • Long-term subsoiling and straw return increase soil organic carbon fractions and crop yield
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society