Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Log out
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Switchgrass yield and stand dynamics from legume intercropping based on seeding rate and harvest management

A.J. Ashworth, F.L. Allen, P.D. Keyser, D.D. Tyler, A.M. Saxton and A.M. Taylor
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2015, 70 (6) 374-384; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.6.374
A.J. Ashworth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F.L. Allen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.D. Keyser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.D. Tyler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.M. Saxton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.M. Taylor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Intercropping legumes may reduce inputs and enhance sustainability of forage and feedstock production, especially on marginal soils. This approach is largely untested for switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) production, yet producer acceptance should be high given the traditional use of legumes in forage/agricultural systems. Our objectives were to evaluate three cool-season and two warm-season legumes and their required densities to influence yield and supply nitrogen (N) compared to three inorganic N levels (0, 33, and 66 kg N ha−1 [0, 30, and 60 lb N ac−1]) at three locations in Tennessee (Knoxville [Sequatchie Silt Loam], Crossville [Lilly Loam], and Milan [Loring B2 Series]). Fall of 2010 seeded, cool-season legumes (red clover [Trifolium pratense L.], hairy vetch [Vicia villosa L.], ladino clover [Trifolium repens L.]), arrowleaf clover (Trifolium vesiculosum L.), and a spring of 2011 seeded, warm-season legume (partridge pea [Chamaecrista fasciculate L.]) were interseeded into switchgrass at three (high, medium, and low) seeding rates each in two experiments. Harvest treatments were annual single, postdormancy biofuel (Experiment One) or integrated forage-biofuel (preanthesis and postdormancy; Experiment Two). Year one yield impacts were minimal. During the second harvest year, legumes increased yield versus Year 1; in general, yields for 33 and 67 kg N ha−1 did not differ from those for red clover, hairy vetch, ladino clover, or partridge pea (p < 0.05). Arrowleaf clover yields were not different from 0 kg N ha−1. Forage biomass yields were generally more responsive to legumes (p < 0.05) than the biomass regime. Legume persistence after three years was generally greatest for ladino clover and partridge pea. Forage quality (switchgrass only) in some cases was positively influenced by legume treatments, notably hairy vetch and partridge pea (p < 0.05). Intercropping selected legumes in switchgrass may enhance forage quality and yield while reducing nonrenewable inputs, fertilizer costs, and emissions/runoff to air and groundwater.

  • © 2015 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 70 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 70, Issue 6
November/December 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Switchgrass yield and stand dynamics from legume intercropping based on seeding rate and harvest management
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Switchgrass yield and stand dynamics from legume intercropping based on seeding rate and harvest management
A.J. Ashworth, F.L. Allen, P.D. Keyser, D.D. Tyler, A.M. Saxton, A.M. Taylor
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2015, 70 (6) 374-384; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.6.374

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Switchgrass yield and stand dynamics from legume intercropping based on seeding rate and harvest management
A.J. Ashworth, F.L. Allen, P.D. Keyser, D.D. Tyler, A.M. Saxton, A.M. Taylor
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2015, 70 (6) 374-384; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.6.374
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Biomass and integrated forage/biomass yields of switchgrass as affected by intercropped cool- and warm-season legumes
  • The 4Rs for cover crops and other advances in cover crop management for environmental quality
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Research Section

  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
Show more Research Section

Research: Advances in Cover Crops

  • Cover crop adoption in Iowa: The role of perceived practice characteristics
  • Trade-offs between winter cover crop production and soil water depletion in the San Joaquin Valley, California
  • Identifying new deep-rooted plant species suitable as undersown nitrogen catch crops
Show more Research: Advances in Cover Crops

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society