Agricultural preservation professionals' perceptions and attitudes about cost-effective land selection methods

References

1. 1. Ando A.,
   2. Jeffrey C.,
   3. Polasky S.,
   4. Solow A.

   . 1998. Species Distribution, Land Values, and Efficient Conservation. Science 279(5359):2126-2128.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Babcock B.A.,
   2. Lakshminarayan P.G.,
   3. Wu J.,
   4. Zilberman D.

   . 1997. Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities. Land Economics 73:325-339.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Bryan B.A.

   2010. Development and application of a model for robust, cost-effective investment in natural capital and ecosystem services. Biological Conservation 143(7):1737-1750.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Bryan B.A.,
   2. Raymond C.,
   3. Crossman N.D.,
   4. King D.

   . 2011. Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 25(1):172-181.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 1. Dillman D.A.

   1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6. 1. Duke J.D.,
   2. Dundas S.J.,
   3. Johnston R.J.,
   4. Messer K.D.

   . 2014. Prioritizing payment for environmental services: Using nonmarket benefits for optimal selection. Ecological Economics 105:319-329.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Duke J.M.,
   2. Dundas S.J.,
   3. Messer K.D.

   . 2013. Cost-effective conservation planning: Lessons from economics. Journal of Environmental Management 125:126-133.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 1. Farmland Information Center

   . 2013. Farm and Ranch Land Protection Program. www.farmlandinfo.org/sites/default/files/FIC_FRPP_09-2013.pdf.
9. 1. Ferraro P.J.

   2003. Conservation contracting in heterogeneous landscapes: An application to watershed protection with threshold constraints. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(1):53-64.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Ferraro P.J.,
    2. Pattanayak S.K.

    . 2006. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4(4):e105.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 1. Finch D.M.,
    2. Patton-Mallory M.

    . 1992. Closing the Gap between Research and Management. Proceedings of the 1992 Partners in Flight Training Workshop. General technical report RM 229. Washington, DC: US Forest Service.
12. 1. Fooks J.R.,
    2. Messer K.D.

    . 2012. Maximizing conservation and in-kind cost share: Applying goal programming to forest protection. Journal of Forest Economics 18(3):207-217.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Yu T.,
    2. Chawla N.,
    3. Simoff S.

    1. Fooks J.R.,
    2. Messer K.D.

    . 2013. Mathematical Programming Applications to Land Conservation and Environmental Quality. In Computational Intelligent Data Analysis for Sustainable Development, eds. Yu T., Chawla N., Simoff S.. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Group, Taylor & Francis Group.
14. 1. Gardner B.D.

    1977. The economics of agricultural land preservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(5):1027-1036.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
15. 1. Hughey K.F.D.,
    2. Cullen R.,
    3. Moran E.

    . 2003. Integrating economic approaches into the evaluation of conservation management initiatives. Conservation Biology 17(1):1-12.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Johnston R.J.,
    2. Duke J.M.

    . 2007. Willingness to pay for agricultural land preservation and policy process attributes: Does the method matter? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(4):1098-1115.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Kaiser H.M.,
    2. Messer K.D.

    . 2011. Mathematical Programming Models for Agricultural, Environmental, and Resource Economics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. 1. Kline J.D.

    2006. Public demand for preserving local open space. Society and Natural Resources 19(7):645-659.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Kline J.,
    2. Wichelns D.

    . 1996. Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs. Land Economics 72(4):538-549.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Lynch L.

    2008. Desirability, challenges, and methods of protecting farmland. Choices 23(4):16-21.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Lynch L.,
    2. Musser W.N.

    . 2001. A relative efficiency analysis of farmland preservation programs. Land Economics 77(4):577-594.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. Margueles C.R.,
    2. Pressey R.L.

    . 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405(6783):243-253.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 1. Messer K.D.

    2006. The conservation benefits of cost-effective land acquisition: A case study in Maryland. Journal of Environmental Management 79:305-315.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 1. Messer K.D.,
    2. Allen W.L.

    . 2010. Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3):442-456.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Messer K.D.,
    2. Kecinski M.,
    3. Tang X.,
    4. Hirsch R.

    . 2016. Multiple-knapsack optimization in land conservation: Results from the first cost-effective program in the US. Land Economics 92(1):117-130.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)

    . 2007. 2007 Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: NASS, USDA.
27. 1. Naidoo R.,
    2. Balmford A.,
    3. Ferraro P.J.,
    4. Polasky S.,
    5. Ricketts T.H.,
    6. Rouget M.

    . 2006. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21(12):681-687.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Parker T.

    2007. Measuring Rurality: Urban Influence Codes. Briefing room, Economic Research Service website. http://webarchives.cdlib.org/sw15d8pg7m/http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/UrbanInf/.
29. 1. Perhans K.,
    2. Kindstrand C.,
    3. Boman M.,
    4. Djupström L.B.,
    5. Gustafsson L.,
    6. Mattsson L.,
    7. Schroeder L.M.,
    8. Weslien J.,
    9. Wikberg S.

    . 2008. Conservation goals and the relative importance of costs and benefits in reserve selection. Conservation Biology 22(5):1331-1339.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. 1. Polasky S.,
    2. Camm J.D.,
    3. Garber-Yonts B.

    . 2001. Selecting biological reserves Cost-effectively: An application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Economics 77(1):68-78.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 1. Prendergast J.R.,
    2. Quinn R.M.,
    3. Lawton J.H.

    . 1999. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology 13(3):484-492.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Rosenberger R.S.

    1998. Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs: Comment. Land Economics 74(4):557-565.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Salafsky N.,
    2. Margoluis R.,
    3. Redford K.H.,
    4. Robinson J.G.

    . 2002. Improving the practice of conservation: A conceptual framework and research agenda for conservation science. Conservation Biology 16:1469-1479.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Underhill L.G.

    1994. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biological Conservation 70(1):85-87.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science