Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Small differences in riparian vegetation significantly reduce land use impacts on stream flow and water quality in small agricultural watersheds

J.W. Chase, G.A. Benoy, S.W.R. Hann and J.M. Culp
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2016, 71 (3) 194-205; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.194
J.W. Chase
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.A. Benoy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.W.R. Hann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.M. Culp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fluvial ecosystem integrity is intimately tied to agricultural intensity in most rural landscapes. Row crop agriculture in particular can elicit a range of deleterious effects on hydrology, surface water quality, and fluvial ecology. Riparian vegetation represents a critical defence of stream systems against environmental perturbations. Vegetation filters surface runoff and encourages infiltration. Furthermore, riparian forests shade streams and are thus able to stabilize in-stream temperature and dissolved oxygen (O). In northwest New Brunswick's potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) growing region, once densely forested riparian corridors now often contain only scattered, irregular patches of residual vegetation, and national water quality standards for streams are regularly exceeded. The objective of this study was to ascertain whether relatively small differences in riparian forest cover are of any significant benefit to stream environments. Specifically, we assessed the capacity of riparian forests to reduce the effects of row crop agriculture on stream flow, water quality, and benthic macroinvertebrate communities of streams draining small subwatersheds near Grand Falls, New Brunswick. The subwatersheds ranged in agricultural intensity from 0.5% to 97% crop cover, which predominantly consisted of potato. Riparian cover and agricultural intensity were highly collinear; hence, riparian forest cover was converted to a binomial categorical predictor (i.e., high and low), with agricultural intensity treated as a continuous covariate. Higher intensity of row-crop agriculture in small subwatersheds corresponded to base flow decline; greater flow pulse frequency; higher dissolved nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), conductivity, pH, and temperature; lower dissolved O; and prevalence of pollution-tolerant macroinvertebrate taxa and grazers. With less than 20% increase in riparian forest cover relative to agricultural intensity, we observed reduced severity of summer low flow periods, significantly lower dissolved phosphate (PO4) concentrations, lower temperatures, and higher dissolved O. Macroinvertebrate assemblage structure of the riparian cover categories diverged with increasing agriculture, demonstrating the value of even minor amounts of riparian vegetation to benthic community condition. Our results conclusively show that relatively small increases in riparian forest cover will lead to statistically detectable and ecologically meaningful improvements to stream health.

  • © 2016 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 71 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 71, Issue 3
May/June 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Small differences in riparian vegetation significantly reduce land use impacts on stream flow and water quality in small agricultural watersheds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
14 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Small differences in riparian vegetation significantly reduce land use impacts on stream flow and water quality in small agricultural watersheds
J.W. Chase, G.A. Benoy, S.W.R. Hann, J.M. Culp
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2016, 71 (3) 194-205; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.71.3.194

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Small differences in riparian vegetation significantly reduce land use impacts on stream flow and water quality in small agricultural watersheds
J.W. Chase, G.A. Benoy, S.W.R. Hann, J.M. Culp
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2016, 71 (3) 194-205; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.71.3.194
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society