Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales

Y. Her, I. Chaubey, J. Frankenberger and D. Smith
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2016, 71 (3) 249-266; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.249
Y. Her
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Chaubey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Frankenberger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of conservation practices actually implemented in reducing sediment and nutrient loads at field and watershed scales. To contribute to the USDA Agency Priority Goal for Water Pilot Projects, we obtained information on conservation practices implemented in the St. Joseph River watershed. Considering expected water quality impacts and simulation ability of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, 5,583 of them were selected and incorporated into modeling at a hydrologic response unit (HRU) level by adjusting associated parameters. A calibrated SWAT model was used to estimate load reduction effectiveness of the selected practices. Model results indicated that many of the practices reduced pollutant loads between 10% and 50% at the field scale, with high variability among the practices. Most conservation practices reduced less than 1% of the loads when calculated for the entire watershed, but the load reduction was still large and thus their cumulative long-term effects were expected to be significant. Conservation crop rotation and no-till, which were the most widely applied conservation practices in the study watershed, provided the greatest sediment load reduction, while conservation crop rotation and cover crop reduced the greatest amount of nutrients. Conservation crop rotation, cover crop, no-till, and mulch-till sometimes increased loads of soluble nutrients, resulting in the overall decrease in their effectiveness. Comparison of the spatial distributions of the selected conservation practices and simulated pollutant loads showed existing conservation practices were not targeted for areas producing relatively greater loads. The findings of this study demonstrated different effectiveness of conservation practices at the different spatial scales, suggesting application area, field-scale effectiveness, and placement of the practices are equally critical in achieving watershed-scale water quality improvement.

  • © 2016 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 71 (3)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 71, Issue 3
May/June 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales
Y. Her, I. Chaubey, J. Frankenberger, D. Smith
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2016, 71 (3) 249-266; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.71.3.249

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Effect of conservation practices implemented by USDA programs at field and watershed scales
Y. Her, I. Chaubey, J. Frankenberger, D. Smith
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May 2016, 71 (3) 249-266; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.71.3.249
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Long-term agro-economic and environmental assessment of adaptive nutrient management on cropland fields with established structural conservation practices
  • Identifying marginal land for Multifunctional Perennial Cropping Systems in the Upper Sangamon River watershed, Illinois
  • Addressing agricultural phosphorus loss in artificially drained landscapes with 4R nutrient management practices
  • Is the use of no-till continuous or rotational? Quantifying tillage dynamics from time-ordered spatially aggregated data
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing Soil Vulnerability Index classification with respect to rainfall characteristics
  • Trade-off analysis of water conservation and water consumption of typical ecosystems at different climatic scales in the Dongjiang River basin, China
  • Long-term subsoiling and straw return increase soil organic carbon fractions and crop yield
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society