Curve number estimation from Brazilian Cerrado rainfall and runoff data

References

1. 1. Ajmal M.,
   2. Kim T.

   . 2014. Quantifying excess stormwater using SCS-CN-based rainfall runoff models and different Curve Number determination methods. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000805, 04014058.
2. 1. Arnold J.G.,
   2. Srinisvan R.,
   3. Muttiah R.S.,
   4. Williams J.R.

   . 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, Part I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1):73-89.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Beven K.,
   2. Germann P.

   . 2013. Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water Resources Research 49(6):3071-3092.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Bonta J.V.

   1997. Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division 123(1)28-36.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Coe M.T.,
   2. Latrubesse E.M.,
   3. Ferreira M.E.,
   4. Amsler M.L.

   . 2011. The effects of deforestation and climate variability on the streamflow of the Araguaia River, Brazil. Biogeochemistry 105(1-3):119-131.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Cooley K.R.,
   2. Lane L.J.

   . 1982. Modified runoff curve numbers for sugarcane and pineapple fields in Hawaii. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37(2):295-298.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Costa M.H.,
   2. Botta A.,
   3. Cardille J.A.

   . 2003. Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantins River, Southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology 283(1-4):206-217.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Crockford R.H.,
   2. Richardson D.P.

   . 2000. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: Effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes 14(16-17):2903-2920.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. D'Asaro F.,
   2. Grillone G.,
   3. Hawkins R.

   . 2014. Curve Number: Empirical evaluation and comparison with Curve Number handbook tables in Sicily. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000997, 04014035.
10. 1. Elhakeem M.,
    2. Papanicolaou A.N.

    . 2009. Estimation of the runoff Curve Number via direct rainfall simulator measurements in the State of Iowa, USA. Water Resources Management 23(12):2455-2473.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Furley P.A.

    1999. The nature and diversity of neotropical savanna vegetation with particular reference to the Brazilian cerrados. Global Ecology and Biogeography 8(3-4):223-241.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Gao G.Y.,
    2. Fu B.J.,
    3. Lu Y.H.,
    4. Liu Y.,
    5. Wang S.,
    6. Zhou J.

    . 2012. Coupling the modified SCS-CN and RUSLE models to simulate hydrological effects of restoring vegetation in the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16(7)2347-2364.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Giambelluca T.W.,
    2. Scholz F.G.,
    3. Bucci S.J.,
    4. Meinzer F.C.,
    5. Goldstein G.,
    6. Hoffmann W.A.,
    7. Franco A.C.,
    8. Buchert M.P.

    . 2009. Evapotranspiration and energy balance of Brazilian savannas with contrasting tree density. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149(8):1365-1376.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Hawkins R.H.

    1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff Curve Numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 119(2):334-345.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Hawkins R.H.,
    2. Ward T.J.,
    3. Woodward D.E.,
    4. Van Mullen J.A.

    . 2009. Curve number hydrology: State of the practice. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
16. 1. Keith D.M.,
    2. Johnson E.A.,
    3. Valeo C.

    . 2010. A hillslope forest floor (duff) water budget and the transition to local control. Hydrological Processes 24(19):2738-2751.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
17. 1. Knisel W.G.

    1980. CREAMS: A field-scale model for chemical, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems, Conservation Research Report, number 26. South East Area, Washington, DC: USDA, Science and Education Administration.
18. 1. Lal M.,
    2. Mishra S.K.,
    3. Pandey A.

    . 2015. Physical verification of the effect of land features and antecedent moisture on runoff curve number. Catena 133(10):318-327.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Lapola D.M.,
    2. Martinelli L.A.,
    3. Peres C.A.,
    4. Ometto J.P.H.B.,
    5. Ferreira M.E.,
    6. Nobre C.A.,
    7. Aguiar A.P.D.,
    8. Bustamante M.M.C.,
    9. Cardoso M.F.,
    10. Costa M.H.,
    11. Joly C.A.,
    12. Leite C.C.,
    13. Moutinho P.,
    14. Sampaio G.,
    15. Strassburg B.B.N.,
    16. Vieira I.C.G.

    . 2014. Pervasive transition of the Brazilian land-use system. Nature Climate Change 4(1):27-35.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Loarie S.R.,
    2. Lobell D.B.,
    3. Asner G.P.,
    4. Mu Q.,
    5. Field C.B.

    . 2011. Direct impacts on local climate of sugarcane expansion in Brazil. Nature Climate Change 1:105-109.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Lucas M.,
    2. Oliveira P.T.S.,
    3. Melo D.C.D.,
    4. Wendland E.

    . 2015. Evaluation of remotely sensed data for estimating recharge to an outcrop zone of the Guarani Aquifer System (South America). Hydrogeology Journal 23(5):961-969.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. McCulloch J.S.G.,
    2. Robinson M.

    . 1993. History of forest hydrology. Journal of Hydrology 150(2-4):189-216.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
23. 1. Mishra S.K.,
    2. Tyagi J.V.,
    3. Singh V.P.,
    4. Singh R.

    . 2006. SCS-CN based modeling of sediment yield. Journal of Hydrology 324(1-4):301-322.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
24. 1. Molina A.,
    2. Govers G.,
    3. Vanacker V.,
    4. Poesen J.,
    5. Zeelmaekers E.,
    6. Cisneros F.

    . 2007. Runoff generation in a degraded Andean ecosystem: Interaction of vegetation cover and land use. Catena 71(2):357-370.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
25. 1. Nash J.E.,
    2. Sutcliffe J.V.

    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Journal of Hydrology 10(3):282-290.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
26. 1. Neris J.,
    2. Tejedor M.,
    3. Rodríguez M.,
    4. Fuentes J.,
    5. Jiménez C.

    . 2013. Effect of forest floor characteristics on water repellency, infiltration, runoff and soil loss in Andisols of Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain). Catena 108(8):50-57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
27. 1. Oliveira P.T.S.,
    2. Nearing M.A.,
    3. Wendland E.

    . 2015a. Orders of magnitude increase in soil erosion associated with land use change from native to cultivated vegetation in a Brazilian savannah environment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40(11):1524-1532.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
28. 1. Oliveira P.T.S.,
    2. Wendland E.,
    3. Nearing M.A.,
    4. Scott R.L.,
    5. Rosolem R.,
    6. da Rocha H.R.

    . 2015b. The water balance components of undisturbed tropical woodlands in the Brazilian cerrado. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 19(6) 2899-2910.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Oliveira P.T.S.,
    2. Nearing M.A.,
    3. Moran M.S.,
    4. Goodrich D.C.,
    5. Wendland E.,
    6. Gupta H.V.

    . 2014. Trends in water balance components across the Brazilian Cerrado. Water Resources Research 50(9):7100-7114.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
30. 1. Ponce V.M.,
    2. Hawkins R.H.

    . 1996. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 1(1):11-19.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Rao V.B.,
    2. Cavalcanti I.F.A.,
    3. Hada K.

    . 1996. Annual variation of rainfall over Brazil and water vapor characteristics over South America. Journal of Geophysical Research 101(D21)26539-26551.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 1. Reys P.A.N.

    2008. Estrutura e fenologia da vegetação de borda e interior em um fragmento de cerrado sensu stricto no sudeste do Brasil (Itirapina, São Paulo). PhD Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo. 124pp.
33. 1. Reys P.,
    2. Camargo M.G.G.,
    3. Grombone-GuaratiniI M.T.,
    4. Teixeira A.P.,
    5. Assis M.A.,
    6. Morellato L.P.C.

    . 2013. Structure and floristic composition of a Cerrado sensu stricto and its relevance to ecological restauration. Hoehnea 40(3):449-464.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. 1. Santos M.A.N.,
    2. Panachuki E.,
    3. Alves Sobrinho T.,
    4. Oliveira P.T.S.,
    5. Rodrigues D.B.B.

    . 2014. Water infiltration in an ultisol after cultivation of common bean. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 38(5)1612-1620.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Sartori A.,
    2. Hawkins R.H.,
    3. Genovez A.M.

    . 2011. Reference Curve Numbers and behavior for sugarcane on highly weathered tropical soils. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 137(11):705-711.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Schiavo J.A.,
    2. Pereira M.G.,
    3. Miranda L.P.M.,
    4. Dias Neto A.H.,
    5. Fontana A.

    . 2010. Characterization and classification of soils developed from sandstone of the Aquidauana formation. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 34(3):881-889.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Schneider L.E.,
    2. McCuen R.H.

    . 2005. Statistical guidelines for Curve Number generation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 131(3):282-290.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Sharpley A.N.,
    2. Williams J.R.

    . 1990. EPIC - Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model Documentation, USDA Technical Bulletin, v.1768. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
39. 1. Shi Z.H.,
    2. Chen L.D.,
    3. Fang N.F.,
    4. Quin D.F.,
    5. Cai C.F.

    . 2009. Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China. Catena 77(1):1-7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
40. 1. Shougrakpam S.,
    2. Sarkar R.,
    3. Dutta S.

    . 2010. An experimental investigation to characterise soil macroporosity under different land use and land covers of northeast India. Journal of Earth System Science 119(5):655-674.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. 1. Soulis K.X.,
    2. Valiantzas J.D.,
    3. Dercas N.,
    4. Londra P.A.

    . 2009. Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13(5):605-615.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. 1. Stewart D.,
    2. Canfield E.,
    3. Hawkins R.H.

    . 2012. Curve Number determination methods and uncertainty in hydrologic soil groups from semiarid watershed data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17(11):1180-1187.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. 1. Tedela N.H.,
    2. McCutcheon S.C.,
    3. Rasmussen T.C.,
    4. Hawkins R.H.,
    5. Swank W.T.,
    6. Campbell J.L.,
    7. Adams M.B.,
    8. Jackson C.R.,
    9. Tollner E.W.

    . 2012. Runoff Curve Numbers for 10 small forested watersheds in the mountains of the Eastern United States. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17(11):1188-1198.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. 1. Tyagi J.V.,
    2. Mishra S.K.,
    3. Singh R.,
    4. Singh V.P.

    . 2008. SCS-CN based time-distributed sediment yield model. Journal of Hydrology 352(3-4):388-403.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
45. 1. USDA

    . 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical release, n. 55 (TR-55). Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
46. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2004. Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. Chapter 10, Part 630, hydrology. National Engineering Handbook, Title 210. Washington, DC: USDA.
47. 1. Williams J.R.,
    2. Nicks A.D.,
    3. Arnold J.G.

    . 1985. Simulator for Water Resources in Rural Basins. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 111(6):970-986.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. 1. Wischmeier W.H.

    1959. A rainfall erosion index for a universal soil-loss equation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 23(3):246-249.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. 1. Young R.A.,
    2. Onstad C.A.,
    3. Bosch D.D.,
    4. Anderson W.P.

    . 1989. AGNPS: A nonpoint-source model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(2):168-173.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
50. 1. Yu B.

    1998. Theoretical justification of SCS method for runoff estimation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 124(6):306-310.

    OpenUrl