Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Impact of Eastern redcedar encroachment on stream discharge in the North Canadian River basin

P.J. Starks and D.N. Moriasi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2017, 72 (1) 12-25; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.1.12
P.J. Starks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.N. Moriasi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Nodvin S.C.,
    2. Waldrop T.A.
    1. Abrams M.D.,
    2. Gibson D.J.
    . 1991. Effects of fire exclusion on tall grass prairie and gallery forest communities in eastern Kansas. In Fire and the Environment: Ecological and Cultural Perspectives, eds. Nodvin S.C., Waldrop T.A.. USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report SEW-69:3-10.
    1. Arnold J.G.,
    2. Fohrer N.
    . 2005. SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrologic Processes 19(3):563-572.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Arnold J.,
    2. Moriasi D.N.,
    3. Gassman P.W.,
    4. Abbaspour K.C.,
    5. White M.J.,
    6. Srinivasan R.,
    7. Santhi C.,
    8. Harmel R.D.,
    9. van Griensven A.,
    10. Van Liew M.W.,
    11. Kannan N.,
    12. Jha M.K.
    . 2012. SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 55(4):1491-1508.
    OpenUrl
    1. Arnold J.G.,
    2. Srinivason R.,
    3. Muttiah R.S.,
    4. Williams J.R.
    . 1998. Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1):73-89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Awada T.,
    2. El-Hage R.,
    3. Ghea M.,
    4. Wedin D.A.,
    5. Huddle J.A.,
    6. Zhou X.,
    7. Msanne J.,
    8. Sudmeyer R.A.,
    9. Martin D.L.,
    10. Brandle J.R.
    . 2012. Intra-annual variability and environmental controls over transpiration in a 58-year-old even-aged stand of invasive woody Juniperus virginiana L. in the Nebraska Sandhills, USA. Ecohydrology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.1294.
    1. Blank R.R.
    2008. Biogeochemistry of plant invasion: A case study with downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Invasive Plant Science and Management 1(2):226-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-07-026.1.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bragg T.B.,
    2. Hulbert L.C.
    . 1976. Woody plant invasion of unburned Kansas bluestem prairie. Journal of Range Management 29:19-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3897682.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Caterina G.L.,
    2. Will R.E.,
    3. Turton D.J.,
    4. Wilson D.S.,
    5. Zou C.B.
    . 2014. Water use of Juniperus virginiana trees encroached into mesic prairies in Oklahoma, USA. Ecohydrology 7:1124-1134.
    OpenUrl
    1. Corbin J.D.,
    2. D'Antonio C.M.
    . 2004. Effects of exotic species on soil nitrogen cycling: Implications for restoration 1. Weed Technology 18(1):1464-1467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2004)018[1464:EOESOS]2.0.CO;2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Craige C.C.,
    2. Buser M.D.,
    3. Frazie R.S.,
    4. Hiziroglu S.S.,
    5. Holcomb R.B.,
    6. Huhnke R.L.
    . 2016. Conceptual design of a biofeedstock supply chain model for eastern redcedar. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 121:12-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.019.
    OpenUrl
    1. Donigian A.S.,
    2. Imhoff J.C.,
    3. Bicknell B.R.
    . 1983. Predicting water quality resulting from agricultural nonpoint-source pollution via simulation – HSPF. In Agricultural Management and Water Quality, 200-249. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
    1. Drake B.,
    2. Todd D.P.
    . 2002. A strategy for control and utilization of invasive juniper species in Oklahoma. Final Report of the “Redcedar task Force”. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry.
    1. Duesterhaus J.L.
    2008. A micrometeorology study of stock watering ponds, rangelands, and woodlands in the Flint Hills of Kansas. PhD Dissertation, Kansas State University.
    1. Dugas W.A.,
    2. Hicks R.A.
    . 1998. Effect of removal of Juniperus ashei on evapotranspiration and runoff in the Seco Creek watershed. Water Resources Research 34:1499-1506.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Wittner R.F.,
    2. Engle D.M.
    1. Engle D.M.
    1985. Effects of eastern redcedar on range forage and livestock production. In Proceedings of Eastern Redcedar in Oklahoma Conference, eds. Wittner R.F., Engle D.M., 53-60. Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University E-849. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.
    1. Fairbourn M.L.
    1982. Water use by forage species. Agronomy Journal 74:62-66.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Reyes W.R.,
    3. Green C.H.,
    4. Arnold J.G.
    . 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future directions. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(4):1211-1250.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gupta H.V.,
    2. Sorooshian S.,
    3. Yapo P.O.
    . 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4(2):135-143.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Paulson R.W.,
    2. Chase E.B.,
    3. Roberts R.S.,
    4. Moody D.W.
    1. Hanson R.L.
    1991. Evapotranspiration and Droughts. In National Water Summary 1988-1989, Hydrologic Events and Floods and Droughts, eds. Paulson R.W., Chase E.B., Roberts R.S., Moody D.W., 99-104. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2375. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
    1. Hargreaves G.H.,
    2. Samani Z.A.
    . 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1:96-99.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Horncastle V.J.,
    2. Hellgren E.C.,
    3. Mayer P.M.,
    4. Ganguli A.C.,
    5. Engle D.M.,
    6. Leslie D.L. Jr..
    2005. Implications of invasion by Juniperus virginiana on small mammals in the southern Great Plains. Journal of Mammalogy 86:1144-1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-015R1.1.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Huang Y.,
    2. Wilcox B.P.,
    3. Stern L.,
    4. Perotto-Baldivieso H.
    . 2006. Springs on rangelands: Runoff dynamics and influence of woody plant cover. Hydrological Processes 20:3277-3288.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Jayakrishnan R.,
    2. Srinivasan R.,
    3. Arnold J.G.
    . 2005. Comparison of rain gauge and WSR-88D stage III precipitation data over the Texas-Gulf basin. Journal of Hydrology 292:135-152.
    OpenUrl
    1. Landon M.K.,
    2. Rus D.L.,
    3. Dietsch B.J.,
    4. Johnson M.R.,
    5. Eggemeyer D.K.
    . 2009. Evapotranspiration rates of riparian forests, Platte River, Nebraska, 2002–06: US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5228. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
    1. Lawson E.R.
    1985. Eastern Redcedar: An American Wood. USDA Forest Service FS-260. http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/usda/amwood/260eredc.pdf.
    1. Le Maitre D.C.,
    2. Gaertner M.,
    3. Marchante E.,
    4. Ens E.J.,
    5. Holmes P.M.,
    6. Pauchard A.,
    7. O'Farrell P.J.,
    8. Rogers A.M.,
    9. Blanchard R.,
    10. Blignaut J.,
    11. Richardson D.M.
    . 2011. Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: Implications for management and restoration. Diversity and Distributions 17:1015–1029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00816.x.
    OpenUrl
    1. Le Maitre D.C.,
    2. van Wilgen B.W.,
    3. Gelderblom C.M,
    4. Bailey C.,
    5. Chapman R.A.,
    6. Nel J.A.
    . 2002. Invasive alien trees and water resources in South Africa: Case studies of the costs and benefits of management. Forest Ecology and Management 160:143-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00474-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lim K.J,
    2. Engel B.A.,
    3. Tang Z.,
    4. Choi J.,
    5. Kim K.,
    6. Muthukrishnan S.,
    7. Tripathy D.
    . 2005. Automated Web GIS Hydrograph Analysis Tool, WHAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(6):1407-1416.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. McKinley D.C.,
    2. Norris M.D.,
    3. Blair J.J.,
    4. Johnson L.C.
    . 2008. Altered ecosystem processes as a consequence of Juniperus virginiana L. encroachment into North American tallgrass prairie. Ecological Studies 196:170-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34003-6_9.
    OpenUrl
    1. McPherson R.A.,
    2. Fiebrich C.A.,
    3. Crawford K.C.,
    4. Elliott R.F.,
    5. Kilby J.R.,
    6. Grimsley D.L.,
    7. Martinez J.E.,
    8. Basara J.B.,
    9. Illston B.G.,
    10. Morriss D.A.,
    11. Kloesel K.A.,
    12. Stadler S.J.,
    13. Melvin A.D.,
    14. Sutherland A.J.,
    15. Shrivastava H.,
    16. Carlson J.D.,
    17. Wolfinbarger J.M.,
    18. Bostic J.P.,
    19. Demko D.B.
    . 2007. Statewide monitoring of the mesoscale environment: A technical update on the Oklahoma Mesonet. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanographic Technology 24(3):301-321.
    OpenUrl
    1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Van Liew M.W.,
    4. Bingner R.L.,
    5. Harmel R.D.,
    6. Veith T.L.
    . 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3):885-900.
    OpenUrl
    1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Starks P.J.
    . 2010. Effects of the resolution of soil dataset and precipitation dataset on SWAT2005 streamflow calibration parameters and simulation accuracy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(2):63-78, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.2.63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nash J.E.,
    2. Sutcliffe J.V.
    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3):282-290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
    1. Neitsch S.L.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Kiniry J.R.,
    4. Srinivasan R.,
    5. Williams J.R.
    . 2002a. Soil and Water Assessment Tool user's manual version 2000. GSWRL Report 02-02, BRC Report 02-06, TR-192. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute.
    1. Neitsch S.L.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Kiniry J.R.,
    4. Williams J.R.,
    5. King K.W.
    . 2002b. Soil and Water Assessment Tool theoretical documentation version 2000. GSWRL Report 02-01, BRC Report 02-05, TR-191. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute.
    1. Nowak D.J.,
    2. Greenfield E.J.
    . 2010. Evaluating the National Land Cover Database tree canopy and impervious cover estimates across the conterminous United States: A comparison with photo-interpreted estimates. Environmental Management 46(3):378-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9536-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. OWRB (Oklahoma Water Resources Board)
    . 2012. Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan. Data and Analysis, Central Watershed Planning Region, Basin 51. https://www.owrb.ok.gov/supply/ocwp/pdf_ocwp/WaterPlanUpdate/regionalreports/OCWP_Central_Region_Report.pdf.
    1. Peterson S.L.,
    2. Stringham T.K.
    . 2008. Infiltration, runoff, and sediment yield in response to Western juniper encroachment in southeast Oregon. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61:74-81.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wittwer R.W.,
    2. Engle D.M.
    1. Snook E.C.
    1985. Distribution of eastern redcedar on Oklahoma rangelands. In Proceedings of the Eastern Redcedar in Oklahoma Conference, eds. Wittwer R.W., Engle D.M.. Cooperative Extension Service, Division of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University E-849:45-52.
    OpenUrl
    1. Spaeth K.E.,
    2. Pierson F.B.,
    3. Weltz M.A.,
    4. Hendricks R.G.
    . 1996. Grazingland Hydrology Issues: Perspectives for the 21st Century. Littleton, CO: Society for Range Management.
    1. Starks P.J.,
    2. Venuto B.C.,
    3. Dugas W.A.,
    4. Kiniry J.
    . 2014. Measurements of canopy interception and transpiration of Eastern redcedar grown in open environments. Environment and Natural Resources Research 4:103-122.
    OpenUrl
    1. Starks P.J.,
    2. Venuto B.C.,
    3. Eckroat J.A.,
    4. Lucas T.
    . 2011. Measuring Eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) mass with the use of satellite imagery. Rangeland Ecology and Management 64(2):178-186.
    OpenUrl
    1. USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers)
    . 2015. CNLO2: Canton Lake. http://www.swt-wc.usace.army.mil/CANT.lakepage.html.
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2003. The National Range and Pasture Handbook. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Grazing Lands Technology Institute. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084.
    1. USDA NRCS Soil Survey Staff
    . 1996. National Soil Survey Handbook. Title 430-VI. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
    1. USDA REEIS (Research, Education, and Economics Information System)
    . 2016. Utilization of the Eastern Red Cedar for Biofuel Production. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University, Biosystems and Ag Engineering. http://www.reeis.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/0229687-utilization-of-the-eastern-red-cedar-for-biofuel-production.html.
    1. USDA SCS (Soil Conservation Service)
    . 1972. Section 4: Hydrology. In National Engineering Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
    1. USGS (United States Geological Survey)
    . 2014. Beaver-North Canadian River Alluvial Aquifer Study. http://ok.water.usgs.gov/projects/ncanadian/.
    1. USGS
    . 2016. Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium, National Land Cover Database. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd01_data.php.
    1. Wahl K.L.,
    2. Tortorelli R.L.
    . 1997. Changes in Flow in the Beaver–North Canadian River Basin Upstream From Canton Lake, Western Oklahoma—USGS/WRIR 96–43. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
    1. White K.L.,
    2. Chaubey I.
    . 2005. Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation for multisite and multivariable SWAT model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(5):1077-1089.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Wilcox B.P.,
    2. Dowhower S.L.,
    3. Teague W.R.,
    4. Thurow T.L.
    . 2006. Long-term water balance in a semiarid shrubland. Rangeland Ecology and Management 59:600-606.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zou C.B.,
    2. Turton D.J.,
    3. Will R.E.,
    4. Engle D.M.,
    5. Fuhlendorf S.D.
    . 2014. Alteration of hydrological processes and streamflow with juniper (Juniperus virginiana) encroachment in a mesic grassland catchment. Hydrological Processes 28:6173-6182.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 72 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 72, Issue 1
January/February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Eastern redcedar encroachment on stream discharge in the North Canadian River basin
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of Eastern redcedar encroachment on stream discharge in the North Canadian River basin
P.J. Starks, D.N. Moriasi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2017, 72 (1) 12-25; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.1.12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Impact of Eastern redcedar encroachment on stream discharge in the North Canadian River basin
P.J. Starks, D.N. Moriasi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2017, 72 (1) 12-25; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.1.12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years
  • An overview of research into conservation practice effects on soil and water resources in the Upper Washita Basin, Oklahoma, United States
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Assessing the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework toolbox in a Southern Piedmont landscape of the United States
  • Soil erodibility after the removal of wood chip mulch: A wind tunnel experiment
  • Combining a saltation impact sensor and a wind tunnel to explore wind erosion processes—A case study in the Zhundong mining area, Xinjiang, China
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society