Assessing effects of sediment-reducing agriculture conservation practices on stream fishes

References

1. 1. Alexander G.G.,
   2. Allan J.D.

   . 2006. Stream restoration in the Upper Midwest, USA. Restoration Ecology 14(4):595-604

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Alexander G.G.,
   2. Allan J.D.

   . 2007. Ecological success in stream restoration: Case studies from the Midwestern United States. Environmental Management 40:245-255.

   OpenUrlPubMed
3. 1. Annis G.M.,
   2. Sowa S.P.,
   3. Diamond D.D.,
   4. Combes M.D.,
   5. Doisy K.E.,
   6. Garringer A.J.,
   7. Hanberry P.

   . 2010a. Developing synoptic human threat indices for assessing the ecological integrity of freshwater ecosystems in EPA Region 7, 1-192. Final Report. Submitted to US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 7. Kansas City, KS: Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership, University of Missouri School of Natural Resources, USEPA.
4. 1. Annis G.M.,
   2. Sowa S.P.,
   3. Diamond D.D.,
   4. Garringer A.J.,
   5. Hanberry P.,
   6. Morey M.E.

   . 2010b. A GAP Analysis for Riverine Ecosystems of the Missouri River basin. Final Report, p. 1,351. Submitted to The USGS National Gap Analysis Program, Reston, Virginia.
5. 1. Bailey R.G.

   1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. Miscellaneous Publication 1391, 1-77. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service.
6. 1. Bailey R.G.

   1983. Delineation of ecosystem regions. Environmental Management 7(4):365-373

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Balon E.

   1981. Additions and amendments to the classification of reproductive styles in fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 6(3-4):377-389.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Balon E.K.

   1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: A proposal and definition. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32(6):821-864

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
9. 1. Belsky A.J.,
   2. Matzke A.,
   3. Uselman S.

   . 1999. Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(1):419-431

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Berkman H.E.,
    2. Rabeni C.F.

    . 1987. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environmental Biology of Fishes 18(4):285-294

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Boesch D.F.,
    2. Brinsfield R.B.,
    3. Magnien R.E.

    . 2001. Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality 30(2):303-320

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 1. Broadmeadow S.,
    2. Nisbet T.R.

    . 2004. The effects of riparian forest management on the freshwater environment: A literature review of best management practice. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8(3):286-305

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Burger L.W. Jr..,
    2. McKenzie D.,
    3. Thackston R.,
    4. Demaso S.J.

    . 2006. The role of farm policy in achieving large-scale conservation: Bobwhite and buffers. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(4):986-993

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Burnham K.P.,
    2. Anderson D.R.

    . 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
15. 1. Chow T.L.,
    2. Rees H.W.,
    3. Daigle J.L.

    . 1999. Effectiveness of terraces/grassed waterway systems for soil and water conservation: A field evaluation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(3):577-583

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. De'ath G.,
    2. Fabricius K.E.

    . 2000. Classification and regression trees: A powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81(11):3178-3192

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Detenbeck N.,
    2. DeVore P.,
    3. Niemi G.,
    4. Lima A.

    . 1992. Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: A review of case studies and synthesis of theory. Environmental Management 16(1):33-53

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Dosskey M.G.,
    2. Eisenhauer D.E.,
    3. Helmers M.J.

    . 2005. Establishing conservation buffers using precision information. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):349-354

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 1. Dosskey M.G.,
    2. Helmers M.J.,
    3. Eisenhauer D.E.,
    4. Franti T.G.,
    5. Hoagland K.D.

    . 2002. Assessment of concentrated flow through riparian buffers. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 57(6):336-343

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Fore J.,
    2. Sowa S.,
    3. Galat D.,
    4. Annis G.,
    5. Diamond D.,
    6. Rewa C.

    . 2014. Riverine threat indices to assess watershed condition and identify primary management capacity of agriculture natural resource management agencies. Environmental Management 53(3):567-582

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Fore J.D.

    2012. Remediating the Effects of Human Threats on Lotic Fish Assemblages Within the Missouri River Basin: How Effective are Conservation Practices? Dissertation, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, University of Missouri.
22. 1. Frimpong E.A.,
    2. Angermeier P.L.

    . 2009. Fish traits: A database of ecological and life-history traits of freshwater fishes of the United States. Fisheries 34(10):487-495

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Frimpong E.A.,
    2. Angermeier P.L.

    . 2010a. Comparative utility of selected frameworks for regionalizing fish-based bioassessments across the United States. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1872-1895.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Frimpong E.A.,
    2. Angermeier P.L.

    . 2010b. Trait-based approaches in the analysis of stream fish communities. Vol. 73, Community ecology of stream fishes: Concepts, approaches, and techniques, American Fisheries Society Symposium.
25. 1. Galat D.L.,
    2. Berry C.R.,
    3. Gardner W.M.,
    4. Hendrickson J.C.,
    5. Mestl G.E.,
    6. Power G.J.,
    7. Stone C.,
    8. Winston M.R.

    . 2005a. Spatiotemporal patterns and changes in Missouri River fishes. American Fisheries Society Symosium 45:249-291.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Benke A.C.,
    2. Cushing C.E.

    1. Galat D.L.,
    2. Berry C.R.,
    3. Peters E.J.,
    4. White R.G.

    . 2005b. Missouri River Basin. In Rivers of North America, ed. Benke A.C., Cushing C.E., 427-480. Oxford: Elsevier.
27. 1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Osei E.,
    3. Saleh A.,
    4. Rodecap J.,
    5. Norvell S.,
    6. Williams J.

    . 2006. Alternative practices for sediment and nutrient loss control on livestock farms in northeast Iowa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 117(2-3):135-144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Tisl J.A.,
    3. Palas E.A.,
    4. Fields C.L.,
    5. Isenhart T.M.,
    6. Schilling K.E.,
    7. Wolter C.F.,
    8. Seigley L.S.,
    9. Helmers M.J.

    . 2010. Conservation practice establishment in two northeast Iowa watersheds: Strategies, water quality implications, and lessons learned. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(6):381-392, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.6.381.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 1. Gilley J.E.,
    2. Doran J.W.,
    3. Karlen D.L.,
    4. Kaspar T.C.

    . 1997. Runoff, erosion, and soil quality characteristics of a former Conservation Reserve Program site. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52(3):189-193

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. 1. Gomi T.,
    2. Sidle R.C.,
    3. Richardson J.S.

    . 2002. Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. BioScience 52(10):905-916

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
31. 1. Gray R.L.,
    2. Teels B.M.

    . 2006. Wildlife and fish conservation through the Farm Bill. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(4):906-913

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Schnepf M.,
    2. Cox C.

    1. Gregory S.,
    2. Allen A.W.,
    3. Baker M.,
    4. Boyer K.,
    5. Dillaha T.,
    6. Elliott J.

    . 2007. Realistic expectations of timing between conservation and restoration actions and ecological responses. In Managing Agricultural Landscapes for Environmental Quality: Strengthening the Science Base, ed. Schnepf M., Cox C., 115-146. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
33. 1. Gregory S.V.

    1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41(8):540-551

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
34. 1. Harding J.S.,
    2. Benfield E.F.,
    3. Bolstad P.V.,
    4. Helfman G.S.,
    5. Jones E.B.D. III.

    . 1998. Stream biodiversity: The ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95(25):14843-14847

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 1. Hartwig N.L.,
    2. Ammon H.U.

    . 2002. Cover crops and living mulches. Weed Science 50(6):688-699

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. Heard L.P.,
    2. Allen A.W.,
    3. Best L.B.,
    4. Brady S.J.,
    5. Burger W.,
    6. Esser A.J.,
    7. Hackett E.,
    8. Johnson D.H.,
    9. Pederson R.L.,
    10. Reynolds R.E.,
    11. Rewa C.,
    12. Ryan M.,
    13. Molleur R.,
    14. Buck P.

    . 2000. A comprehensive review of Farm Bill contributions to wildlife conservation, 1985-2000. Technical Report. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Wildlife Habitat Management Institute.
37. IBM SPSS Statistics. 2007. SPSS Decision Trees 17.0. Chicago, IL: IBM Corporation.
38. 1. Kondolf G.M.,
    2. Piégay H.,
    3. Landon N.

    . 2002. Channel response to increased and decreased bedload supply from land use change: Contrasts between two catchments. Geomorphology 45:35-51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Lamouroux N.,
    2. Poff N.L.,
    3. Angermeier P.L.

    . 2002. Intercontinental convergence of stream fish community traits along geomorphic and hydraulic gradients. Ecology 83(7):1792-1807

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Lemke A.M.,
    2. Kirkham K.G.,
    3. Lindenbaum T.T.,
    4. Herbert M.E.,
    5. Tear T.H.,
    6. Perry W.L.,
    7. Herkert J.R.

    . 2011. Evaluating agricultural best management practices in tile-drained subwatersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois. Journal of Environmental Quality 40:1215-1228.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
41. 1. Linting M.,
    2. Meulman J.J.,
    3. Groenen P.J.F.,
    4. van der Koojj A.J.

    . 2007. Nonlinear principal components analysis: Introduction and application. Psychological Methods 12(3):336-358

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 1. Matisoff G.,
    2. Bonniwell E.C.,
    3. Whiting P.J.

    . 2002. Soil erosion and sediment sources in an Ohio watershed using beryllium-7, cesium-137, and lead-210. Journal of Environmental Quality 31(1):54-61

    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 1. Meehan W.R.,
    2. Platts W.S.

    . 1978. Livestock grazing and the aquatic environment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 33(6):274-278

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Miller D.A.,
    2. White R.A.

    . 1998. A conterminous United States multilayer soil characteristics dataset for regional climate and hydrology modeling. Earth Interactions 2(2):1-26

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Moyle P.B.,
    2. Yoshiyama R.M.

    . 1994. Protection of aquatic biodiversity in California: A five-tiered approach. Fisheries 19(2):6-18

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Nerbonne B.A.,
    2. Vondracek B.

    . 2001. Effects of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA. Environmental Management 28(1):87-99

    OpenUrlPubMed
47. 1. NFHAP (National Fish Habitat Action Plan)

    . 2006. National Fish Habitat Action Plan. Washington, DC: Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. www.fishhabitat.org/files/uploads/National_Fish_Habitat_Action_Plan_2006.pdf.
48. 1. Olden J.D.,
    2. Jackson D.A.

    . 2002. A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions. Freshwater Biology 47(10):1976-1995

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. 1. Palmer M.A.,
    2. Bernhardt E.S.,
    3. Allan J.D.,
    4. Lake P.S.,
    5. Alexander G.,
    6. Brooks S.,
    7. Carr J.,
    8. Clayton S.,
    9. Dahm C.N.,
    10. Shah J.F.,
    11. Galat D.L.,
    12. Loss S.G.,
    13. Goodwin P.,
    14. Hart D.D.,
    15. Hassett B.,
    16. Jenkinson R.,
    17. Kondolf G.M.,
    18. Lave R.,
    19. Meyer J.L.,
    20. O'Donnell T.K.,
    21. Pagano L.,
    22. Sudduth E.

    . 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42(2):208-217

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Paukert C.P.,
    2. Pitts K.L.,
    3. Whittier J.B.,
    4. Olden J.D.

    . 2011. Development and assessment of a landscape-scale ecological threat index for the Lower Colorado River basin. Ecological Indicators 11(2):304-310

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Gresswell R.E.,
    2. Barton B.A.,
    3. Kershner J.L

    1. Platts W.S.

    1989. Compatibility of livestock grazing strategies with fisheries. In Practical Approaches to Riparian Resource Management: An Education Workshop, ed. Gresswell R.E., Barton B.A., Kershner J.L, 103-110. Billings, MT: US Bureau of Land Management.
52. 1. Poff N.L.

    1997. Landscape filters and species traits: Towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(2):391-409

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Poff N.L.,
    2. Allan J.D.

    . 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrologic variability. Ecology 76(2):606-627

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. 1. Rabeni C.F.,
    2. Smale M.A.

    . 1995. Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zone. Hydrobiologia 303(1):211-219

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Rankin E.T.,
    2. Miltner B.,
    3. Yoder C.,
    4. Mishne D.

    . 1999. Association Between Nutrients, Habitat, and the Aquatic Biota in Ohio Rivers and Streams. Columbus, OH: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
56. 1. Schnepf M.,
    2. Cox C.

    1. Reeder R.O.,
    2. Westermann D.

    . 2006. Soil Management Practices. In Environmental Benefits of Conservation on Cropland: The Status of Our Knowledge, ed. Schnepf M., Cox C., 1-87. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
57. 1. Schnepf M.,
    2. Cox C.A.

    . 2006. Environmental benefits of conservation on cropland: The status of our knowledge. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
58. 1. Soller D.R.,
    2. Reheis M.C.,
    3. Garrity C.P.,
    4. Van Sistine D.R.

    . 2009. Map database for surficial materials in the conterminous United States: US Geological Survey Data Series 425. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/425/.
59. 1. Sowa S.P.,
    2. Annis G.,
    3. Morey M.E.,
    4. Garringer A.

    . 2006. Developing Predicted Distribution Models for Fish Species in Nebraska. Final Report, 1-494. Submitted to The USGS National GAP Analysis Program. Moscow, ID: Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership, University of Missouri School of Natural Resources.
60. 1. Steen P.J.,
    2. Zorn T.G.,
    3. Seelbach P.W.,
    4. Schaeffer J.S.

    . 2008. Classification tree models for predicting distributions of Michigan stream fish from landscape variables. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137(4):976-996

    OpenUrl
61. 1. Sutherland A.B.,
    2. Meyer J.L.,
    3. Gardiner E.P.

    . 2002. Effects of land cover on sediment regime and fish assemblage structure in four southern Applachian streams. Freshwater Biology 47:1791-1805.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Tingle C.H.,
    2. Shaw D.R.,
    3. Boyette M.,
    4. Murphy G.P.

    . 1998. Metolachlor and metribuzin losses in runoff as affected by width of vegetative filter strips. Weed Science 46(4):475-479

    OpenUrl
63. 1. Trimble S.W.,
    2. Mendel A.C.

    . 1995. The cow as a geomorphic agent – A critical review. Geomorphology 13(1-4):233-253.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
64. 1. Tripathi M.P.,
    2. Panda R.K.,
    3. Raghuwanshi N.S.

    . 2003. Identification and prioritisation of critical sub-watersheds for soil conservation management using the SWAT model. Biosystems Engineering 85(3):365-379

    OpenUrlCrossRef
65. 1. USDA ERS (Economic Research Service)

    . 2014. Conservation: Title II and Title XI (Crop Insurance). http://www.ers.usda.gov/agricultural-act-of-2014-highlights-and-implications/conservation.aspx.
66. 1. USDA FSA (Farm Service Agency)

    . 2012. Conservation Reserve Program Annual Summary and Enrollment Statistics FY 2012. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/summary12.pdf.
67. 1. USDA NASS (National Agriculture Statistics Service)

    . 2009. 2007 Census of Agriculture: Missouri Water Resource Region 10 HUC6 Level Watersheds. Washington, DC: USDA National Agriculture Statistics Service.
68. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2012a. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Cultivated Cropland in the Missouri River Basin, 1-225. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
69. 1. USDA NRCS

    . 2012b. Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Cultivated Cropland in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
70. 1. USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2000. Atlas of America's Polluted Waters. Office of Water (4503F). Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
71. 1. USGS (US Geological Survey)

    . 2008. National Hydrography Dataset. http://nhd.usgs.gov/index.html.
72. 1. Schnepf M.,
    2. Cox C.

    1. Walter T.,
    2. Dosskey M.,
    3. Khanna M.,
    4. Miller J.,
    5. Tomer M.,
    6. Wiens J.

    . 2007. The science of targeting within landscapes and watersheds to improve conservation effectiveness. In Managing Agricultural Landscapes for Environmental Quality: Strengthening the Science Base, ed. Schnepf M., Cox C., 63-89. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
73. 1. Wang L.,
    2. Lyons J.,
    3. Kanehl P.

    . 2002. Effects of watershed best management practices on habitat and fish in Wisconsin streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(3):663-680

    OpenUrl
74. 1. Waters T.F.

    1995. Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects, and Control. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, Monograph 7.
75. 1. Westra J.V.,
    2. Zimmerman J.K.H.,
    3. Vondracek B.

    . 2004. Do conservation practices and programs benefit the intended resource concern? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33(1):105-120

    OpenUrl
76. 1. Wood P.J.,
    2. Armitage P.D.

    . 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management 21(2):203-217

    OpenUrlGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
77. 1. Zaimes G.N.,
    2. Schultz R.C.,
    3. Isenhart T.M.

    . 2004. Stream bank erosion adjacent to riparian forest buffers, row-crop fields, and continuously-grazed pastures along Bear Creek in central Iowa. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 59(1):19-27

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
78. 1. Zimmerman J.K.H.,
    2. Vondracek B.,
    3. Westra J.

    . 2003. Agricultural land use effects on sediment loading and fish assemblages in two Minnesota (USA) watersheds. Environmental Management 32(1):93-105

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science