Conceptual models for surface water and groundwater interactions at pond and plug restored meadows

References

1. 1. Abatzoglou J.T.

   2011. Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modeling. International Journal of Climatology 33(1):121-131.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Allen R.G.

   2013. Ref-ET: Reference evapotranspiration calculation (2013) Version 3.1.15 for Windows. http://extension.uidaho.edu/kimberly/2013/04/ref-et-reference-evapotranspiration-calculator/.
3. 1. Allen R.G.,
   2. Pereira L.C.,
   3. Raes D.,
   4. Smith M.

   . 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
4. 1. Allen-Diaz B.H.

   1991. Water table and plant species relationships in Sierra Nevada meadows. The American Midland Naturalist 126:30-43.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Archbald G.

   2008. Using a Topcon Laser Level to Survey Elevation. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State University.
6. 1. Beamer J.P.,
   2. Huntington J.L.,
   3. Morton C.G.,
   4. Pohll G.M.

   . 2013. Estimating annual groundwater evapotranspiration from phreatophytes in the Great Basin using landsat and flux tower measurements. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49:518-533.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
7. 1. Debinski D.M.,
   2. Jakubauskas M.E.,
   3. Kindscher K.

   . 2000. Montane meadows as indicators of environmental change. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 64:213-225.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Dickard M.,
   2. Gonzales M.,
   3. Elmore S.,
   4. Leonard D.,
   5. Smith S.,
   6. Staats J.,
   7. Summers P.,
   8. Weixelman D.,
   9. Wyman S.

   . 2015. Riparian area management: Proper functioning condition assessment for lotic areas. Technical Reference 1737-15. Denver, CO: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Operations Center.
9. 1. Elmore W.,
   2. Beschta R.L.

   . 1987. Riparian areas: Perceptions in management. Rangelands 9:260-265.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Esri

    . 2013. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
11. 1. Essaid H.I.,
    2. Hill B.R.

    . 2014. Watershed-scale modeling of streamflow change in incised montane meadows. Water Resources Research 50:2657-2678.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Lynch P.

    1. Fetter C.W.

    2001. Applied Hydrogeology, 4th Ed., ed. Lynch P.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. 1. Hammersmark C.T.,
    2. Dobrowski S.Z.,
    3. Rains M.C.,
    4. Mount J.F.

    . 2010. Simulated effects of stream restoration on the distribution of wet meadow vegetation. Restoration Ecology 18:882-893.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Hammersmark C.T.,
    2. Rains M.C.,
    3. Mount J.F.

    . 2008. Quantifying the hydrological effects of stream restoration in a montane meadow, northern California, USA. River Research and Application 24:735-753.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Hammersmark C.T.,
    2. Rains M.C.,
    3. Wickland A.C.,
    4. Mount J.F.

    . 2009. Vegetation and water-table relationships in a hydrologically restored riparian meadow. Wetlands 29:785-797.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Heede R.H.

    1979. Deteriorated watersheds can be restored: A case study. Environmental Management 3:271-281.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Hill B.

    1990. Groundwater discharge to a headwater valley, Northwestern Nevada, U.S.A. Journal of Hydrology 113:265-283.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
18. 1. Hill B.

    2011. Evaluating effects of meadow restoration on summer stream flows. USDA Forest Service. Presented at Meadow Restoration Informational Meeting, Quincy, California, February 3, 2011.
19. 1. Hill B.

    2012. Sierra Nevada meadow hydrology assessment. Department of Water Resources State Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting, Sacramento, California, December 13, 2012.
20. 1. Hill B.R.,
    2. Mitchell-Bruker S.

    . 2010. Comment on “A framework for Understanding the Hydrology of Impacted Wet Meadows in the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges, California, USA”: paper published in Hydrogeology Journal (2009) 17:229-246, by S.P. Loheide II and R.S. Deitchman. Hydrogeology Journal 18:1741-1743.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
21. 1. Johnson A.I.

    1967. Specific yield: Compilation of specific yields for various materials. Water Supply Paper 1662-D. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.
22. 1. Klein L.R.,
    2. Clayton S.R.,
    3. Alldredge J.R.,
    4. Goodwin P.

    . 2007. Long-term monitoring and evaluation of lower Red River meadow restoration project, Idaho, U.S.A. Restoration Ecology 15:223-239.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Lindquist D.S.,
    2. Wilcox J.

    . 2000. New concepts for meadow restoration in the Northern Sierra Nevada. Quincy, CA: Feather River Coordinated Resource Management Group.
24. 1. Loheide S.P.,
    2. Booth E.G.

    . 2011. Effects of changing channel morphology on vegetation, groundwater, and soil moisture regimes in groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Geomorphology 126:364-376.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
25. 1. Loheide S.P.,
    2. Deitchman R.S.,
    3. Cooper D.J.,
    4. Wolf E.C.,
    5. Hammersmark C.T.,
    6. Lundquist J.D.

    . 2009. A framework for understanding the hydroecology of impacted wet meadows in the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Ranges, California, USA. Hydrogeology Journal 17:229-246.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Loheide S.P.,
    2. Gorelick S.M.

    . 2005. A local-scale, high-resolution evapotranspiration mapping algorithm (ETMA) with hydroecological applications at riparian meadow restoration sites. Remote Sensing of Environment 98(2-3):182-200.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Loheide S.P.,
    2. Gorelick S.M.

    . 2007. Riparian hydroecology: A coupled model of the observed interactions between groundwater flow and meadow vegetation patterning. Water Resources Research 43 W07414:1-16.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
28. 1. Lowry C.S.,
    2. Deems J.S.,
    3. Loheide S.P.,
    4. Lundquist J.D.

    . 2010. Linking snowmelt-derived fluxes and groundwater flow in a high elevation meadow system, Sierra Nevada mountains, California. Hydrological Processes 24:2821-2833.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
29. 1. Lowry C.S.,
    2. Loheide S.P.

    . 2010. Groundwater-dependent vegetation: Quantifying the groundwater subsidy. Water Resources Research 46:W06202.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. NFWF (National Fish and Wildlife Foundation)

    . 2010. Sierra Nevada Meadow Restoration Business Plan. http://www.nfwf.org/sierranevada/documents/sierra_meadow_restoration_business_plan.pdf.
31. 1. Ohara N.,
    2. Kavvas M.L.,
    3. Chen Z.Q.,
    4. Liang L.,
    5. Anderson M.,
    6. Wilcox J.,
    7. Mink L.

    . 2013. Modelling atmospheric and hydrologic processes for assessment of meadow restoration impact on flow and sediment in a sparsely gauged California watershed. Hydrological Processes 28:3053-3066.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Peters A.J.,
    2. Eve M.D.,
    3. Holt E.H.,
    4. Whitford W.G.

    . 1997. Analysis of desert plant community growth patterns with high temporal resolution satellite spectra. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:418-432.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Ponce V.M.,
    2. Lindquist D.S.

    . 1990. Management of baseflow augmentation: A review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 26:259-268.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Prichard D.,
    2. Berg F.,
    3. Hagenbuck W.,
    4. Krapf R.,
    5. Leinard R.,
    6. Leonard S.,
    7. Manning M.,
    8. Noble C.,
    9. Staats J.

    . 2003. Riparian area management: A user guide to assessing proper functioning condition and the supporting science for lentic area. Technical Reference 1737-16. Denver, CO: USDA Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.
35. 1. Prichard D.,
    2. Bridges C.,
    3. Leonard S.,
    4. Krapf R.,
    5. Hagenbuck W.

    . 1998. Riparian area management: Process for assessing proper functioning condition for lentic riparian-wetland areas. Technical Reference 1737-11. Denver, CO: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.
36. 1. PRISM Climate Group

    . 2015. Parameter elevation Regression on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) Climate Data. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. http://prism.oregonstate.edu.
37. 1. Seevers P.M.,
    2. Ottmann R.W.

    . 1994. Evapotranspiration estimation using a normalized difference vegetation index transformation of satellite data. Hydrological Sciences 39:333-245.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Soil Survey Staff

    . 2013. Web Soil Survey. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.
39. 1. Szilagyi J.

    2002. Vegetation indices to aid areal evapotranspiration estimations. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 7:368-372.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Szilagyi J.,
    2. Parlange M.B.

    . 1999. Defining watershed-scale evaporation using a normalized difference vegetation index. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:1245-1255.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Szilagyi J.,
    2. Rundquist D.C.,
    3. Gosselin D.C.,
    4. Parlange M.B.

    . 1998. NDVI relationship to monthly evaporation. Geophysical Research Letters 25:1753-1756.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Tague C.,
    2. Valentine S.,
    3. Kotchen M.

    . 2008. Effect of geomorphic channel restoration on streamflow and groundwater in a snowmelt-dominated watershed. Water Resources Research 44:1-10.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
43. 1. Tasumi M.,
    2. Allen R.G.,
    3. Trezza R.

    . 2008. At-surface reflectance and albedo from satellite for operational calculation of land surface energy balance. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 13:51-63.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. TDS (Tripod Data Systems)

    . 1999-2007. SOLO Field. Corvallis, OR: Tripod Data Systems, Inc.
45. 1. USGS (US Geological Survey)

    . 2015. The StreamStats program for California. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, USGS. http://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/california.html.
46. 1. Weisberg P.J.,
    2. Mortenson S.G.,
    3. Dilts T.E.

    . 2012. Gallery forest or herbaceous wetland? The need for multi-target perspective in riparian restoration planning. Restoration Ecology 21:12-16.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
47. 1. Winter T.C.

    2007. The role of groundwater in generating streamflow in headwater areas and in maintaining baseflow. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43(1):15-25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
48. 1. WRCC (Western Regional Climate Center)

    . 2013. RAWS USA Climate Archive. http://www.raws.dri.edu/.