Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

Validity of Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load upheld

J. David Aiken
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation July 2017, 72 (4) 87A-92A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.4.87A
J. David Aiken
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program)
    . 1983. Chesapeake Bay Agreement—1983. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/chesapeake_bay_agreement_-_1983.
    1. CBP
    . 1987. 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/chesapeake_bay_agreement_-_1987.
    1. CBP
    . 1997. Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Reduction Progress and Future Directions. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/chesapeake_bay_nutrient_reduction_progress_and_future_directions_19971.
    1. CBP
    . 2000. Chesapeake 2000 Agreement. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/chesapeake_2000_agreement.
    1. CBP
    . 2008. Chesapeake Bay 2007 Health and Restoration Assessment. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/chesapeake_bay_2007_health_and_restoration_assessment.
    1. DDA (Delaware Department of Agriculture)
    . 2017. Nutrient Management. Dover, DE: Delaware Department of Agriculture. http://dda.delaware.gov/nutrients/index.shtml.
    1. Houck O.
    2011. The Clean Water Act returns (again): Part I, TMDLs and the Chesapeake Bay. Environmental Law Reporter 41(3):10208-10228.
    OpenUrl
    1. MDA (Maryland Department of Agriculture)
    . 2017. Agricultural Nutrient Management. Annapolis, MD: Maryland Department of Agriculture. http://mda.maryland.gov/resource_conservation/Pages/nutrient_management.aspx.
    1. PDEP (Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection)
    . 2017. Manure Management. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. http://www.dep.pa.gov/Business/Water/CleanWater/AgriculturalOperations/ManureManagement/Pages/default.aspx.
    1. Perez M.,
    2. Cox C.,
    3. Cook K.
    . 2009. Facing facts in the Chesapeake Bay. Washington, DC: Environmental Working Group. http://www.ewg.org/research/facing-facts-chesapeake-bay.
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2010. Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/chesapeake-bay-tmdl/chesapeake-bay-tmdl-document.
    1. VDCR (Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation)
    . 2017. Virginia's Nutrient Management Program. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/soil-and-water/nutmgt.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 72 (4)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 72, Issue 4
July/August 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validity of Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load upheld
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Validity of Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load upheld
J. David Aiken
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2017, 72 (4) 87A-92A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.4.87A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Validity of Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load upheld
J. David Aiken
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jul 2017, 72 (4) 87A-92A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.4.87A
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • To protect and conserve: Fifty years of Nebraska’s Natural Resources Districts
  • Sustaining soil for advancing peace: World is one family
  • Managing plant surplus carbon to generate soil organic matter in regenerative agriculture
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Stimulating soil health within Nebraska's Natural Resources Districts
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society