Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Farmer preferences for conservation incentives that promote voluntary phosphorus abatement in agricultural watersheds

L.H. Palm-Forster, S.M. Swinton and R.S. Shupp
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2017, 72 (5) 493-505; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.5.493
L.H. Palm-Forster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.M. Swinton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.S. Shupp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. AFT (American Farmland Trust)
    . 2012. What is the BMP Challenge? http://blog.farmland.org/what-is-the-bmp-challenge/.
    1. Baerenklau K.A.
    2005. Some simulation results for a green insurance mechanism. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(1):94-108.
    OpenUrl
    1. Becker G.,
    2. DeGroot M.,
    3. Marschak J.
    . 1964. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 9(3):226–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bosch N.S.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Dolan D.M.,
    4. Han H.,
    5. Richards R.P.
    . 2011. Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool for six watersheds of Lake Erie: Model parameterization and calibration. Journal of Great Lakes Research 37(2):263–71., doi:10.1016/j. jglr.2011.03.004.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Campbell S.
    2003. Insuring best management practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58(6):116A–117A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Cason T.N.,
    2. Gangadharan L.,
    3. Duke C.
    . 2003. A laboratory study of auctions for reducing non-point source pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(3):446–71., doi:10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00026-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Claassen R.,
    2. Cattaneo A.,
    3. Johansson R.
    . 2008. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological Economics 65(4):737–52., doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. DeVuyst E.A.,
    2. Ipe C V.
    . 1999. A group incentive contract to promote adoption of best management practices. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(2):367–382.
    OpenUrl
    1. Edwards-Jones G.
    2006. Modelling farmer decision-making: Concepts, progress and challenges. Animal Science 82(06):783–90., doi:10.1017/ASC2006112.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Feather P.M.,
    2. Amacher G.S.
    . 1994. Role of information in the adoption of best management practices for water quality improvement. Agricultural Economics 11(2–3):159–70, doi:10.1016/0169-5150(94)00013-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Gassman P.W.,
    2. Reyes M.R.,
    3. Green C.H.,
    4. Arnold J.G.
    . 2007. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions. Ames, IA: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. http://publications.iowa.gov/archive/00005419/01/paper_12744.pdf.
    1. Hellerstein D.,
    2. Higgins N.,
    3. Roberts M.
    . 2015. Options for Improving Conservation Programs: Insights from Auction Theory and Economic Experiments (No. ERR-181). Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
    1. Horowitz J.K.,
    2. Lynch L.,
    3. Stocking A.
    . 2009. Competition-based environmental policy: An analysis of farmland preservation in Maryland. Land Economics 85(4):555–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. IJC (International Joint Commission)
    . 2014. A Balanced Diet for Lake Erie: Reducing Phosphorus Loadings and Harmful Algal Blooms. A Report of the Lake Erie Ecosystem Priority. http://www.ijc.org/files/publications/2014%20IJC%20LEEP%20REPORT.pdf.
    1. Johnson L.T.,
    2. Baker D.B.,
    3. Confesor R.B.,
    4. Krieger K.A.,
    5. Richards R.P.
    . 2014. Research to help Lake Erie: Proceedings of the “Phosphorus along the Land–River–Lake Continuum” research planning and coordination workshop. Journal of Great Lakes Research 40(3):574–77., doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2014.07.001.
    OpenUrl
    1. Juutinen A.,
    2. Mäntymaa E.,
    3. Ollikainen M.
    . 2013. Landowners' conservation motives and the size of information rents in environmental bidding systems. Journal of Forest Economics 19(2):128–48., doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2012.12.001.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kleinman P.J.A.,
    2. Smith D.R.,
    3. Bolster C.H.,
    4. Easton Z.M.
    . 2015. Phosphorus fate, management, and modeling in artificially drained systems. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(2):460.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kroeger T.,
    2. Casey F.
    . 2007. An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecological Economics 64(2):321–32., doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lambert D.M.,
    2. Sullivan P.,
    3. Claassen R.,
    4. Foreman L.
    . 2007. Profiles of U.S. farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices. Land Use Policy 24(1):72–88., doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.12.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Lichtenberg E.
    2004. Cost-responsiveness of conservation practice adoption: A revealed preference approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(3):420–35., doi:10.2307/40987242.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. LimnoTech
    . 2013. Tiffin River Great Lakes Tributary Modeling Program: Development and Application of the Tiffin River Watershed Soil and Water Assessment Tool (TRSWAT). Ann Arbor, MI: LimnoTech.
    1. Lusk J.L.,
    2. Alexander C.,
    3. Rousu M.C.
    . 2007. Designing experimental auctions for marketing research: The effect of values, distributions, and mechanisms on incentives for truthful bidding. Review of Marketing Science 5(1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1546-5616.1059.
    1. Lusk J.L.,
    2. Shogren J.F.
    . 2007. Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Ma S.,
    2. Swinton S.M.,
    3. Lupi F.,
    4. Jolejole-Foreman C.
    . 2012. Farmers' willingness to participate in payment-for-environmental-services programmes. Journal of Agricultural Economics 63(3):604–26., doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00358.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Mitchell P.D.
    2004. Nutrient best management practice insurance and farmer perceptions of adoption risk. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(3):657–73.
    OpenUrl
    1. Babcock B.A.,
    2. Fraser R.W.,
    3. Lekakis J.N.
    1. Mitchell P.D.,
    2. Hennessy D.A.
    . 2003. Factors determining best management practice adoption incentives and the impact of green insurance. In Risk Management and the Environment: Agriculture in Perspective, eds. Babcock B.A., Fraser R.W., Lekakis J.N., 52-66. Netherlands: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-2915-4_4.
    1. Batie S.S.,
    2. Mercuro N.
    1. Norris P.E.,
    2. Schweikhardt D.B.,
    3. Scorsone E.A.
    . 2008. The instituted nature of market information. In Alternative Institutional Structures: Evolution and Impact, eds. Batie S.S., Mercuro N., 330–48. London: Routledge.
    1. Palm-Forster L.H.
    2015. Cost-effective conservation programs to enhance ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University. http://search.proquest.com/pqdt/docview/1748077791/abstract/A801AC8B89324793PQ/1.
    1. Palm-Forster L.H.,
    2. Lupi F.,
    3. Chen M.
    . 2016a. Valuing Lake Erie beaches using value and function transfers. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 45(2):270–292.
    OpenUrl
    1. Palm-Forster L.H.,
    2. Swinton S.M.,
    3. Lupi F.,
    4. Shupp R.S.
    . 2016b. Too burdensome to bid: Transaction costs and pay-for-performance conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98(5):1314–1333., http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aaw071.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Palm-Forster L.H.,
    2. Swinton S.M.,
    3. Redder T.M,
    4. DePinto J.V.,
    5. Boles C.M.W.
    . 2016c. Using conservation auctions informed by environmental performance models to reduce agricultural nutrient flows into Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 42(6):1357–1371., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.08.003.
    OpenUrl
    1. Peterson J.M.,
    2. Smith C.M.,
    3. Leatherman J.C.,
    4. Hendricks N.P.,
    5. Fox J.A.
    . 2014. Transaction costs in payment for environmental service contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97(1):219–38., doi:10.1093/ajae/aau071.
    OpenUrl
    1. Prokopy L.S.,
    2. Floress K.,
    3. Klotthor-Weinkauf D.,
    4. Baumgart-Getz A.
    . 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(5):300–311., doi:10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Reichelderfer K.,
    2. Boggess W.G.
    . 1988. Government decision making and program performance: The case of the conservation reserve program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(1):1–11., doi:10.2307/1241970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Scavia D.,
    2. Allan J.D.,
    3. Arend K.K.,
    4. Bartell S.,
    5. Beletsky D.,
    6. Bosch N.S.,
    7. Brandt S.B.,
    8. Briland R.D.,
    9. Daloglu I.,
    10. DePinto J.V.,
    11. et al
    . 2014. Assessing and addressing the re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Central basin hypoxia. Journal of Great Lakes Research 40(2):226–46., doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2014.02.004.
    OpenUrl
    1. Selman M.,
    2. Greenhalgh S.,
    3. Taylor M.,
    4. Guiling J.
    . 2008. Paying for environmental performance: Potential cost savings using a reverse auction in program sign-up. Environmental Markets: Farm Bill Conservation Programs No.5. WRI Policy Note. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
    1. Stumpf R.P.,
    2. Wynne T.T.,
    3. Baker D.B.,
    4. Fahnenstiel G.L.
    . 2012. Interannual variability of cyanobacterial blooms in Lake Erie. PLoS ONE 7(8):e42444, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)
    . 2014. Quick Stats Tools. Washington, DC: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/.
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2016. Governments of Canada and the United States Announce Phosphorus Reduction Targets of 40 Percent to Improve Lake Erie Water Quality and Reduce Public Health Risk. Speeches, Testimony and Transcripts. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/governments-canada-and-united-states-announce-phosphorus-reduction-targets-40-percent.
    1. Wilson R.S.,
    2. Howard G.,
    3. Burnett E.A.
    . 2014. Improving nutrient management practices in agriculture: The role of risk-based beliefs in understanding farmers' attitudes toward taking additional action. Water Resources Research 50(8):6735–46., doi:10.1002/2013WR015200.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 72 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 72, Issue 5
September/October 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Farmer preferences for conservation incentives that promote voluntary phosphorus abatement in agricultural watersheds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Farmer preferences for conservation incentives that promote voluntary phosphorus abatement in agricultural watersheds
L.H. Palm-Forster, S.M. Swinton, R.S. Shupp
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2017, 72 (5) 493-505; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.5.493

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Farmer preferences for conservation incentives that promote voluntary phosphorus abatement in agricultural watersheds
L.H. Palm-Forster, S.M. Swinton, R.S. Shupp
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2017, 72 (5) 493-505; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.5.493
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phytoremediation and high rainfall combine to improve soil and plant health in a North America Northern Great Plains saline sodic soil
  • Combining a saltation impact sensor and a wind tunnel to explore wind erosion processes–A case study in the Zhundong mining area, Xinjiang, China
  • Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from wood of Gliricidia sepium based on the pyrolysis temperature and its applications
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2022 Soil and Water Conservation Society