Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

Confined animal feeding operations and state-based right to farm laws: Managing twenty-first century agriculture with a twentieth century framework in the case of Wisconsin, United States

Amy A. Schultz and Harvey M. Jacobs
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2017, 72 (6) 133A-138A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.6.133A
Amy A. Schultz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harvey M. Jacobs
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Black B.
    1990. Matching evidence about clustered health events with tort law requirements. American Journal of Epidemiology 132:S79–S86.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Casey J.A.,
    2. Kim B.F.,
    3. Larsen J.,
    4. Price L.B.,
    5. Nachman K.E.
    . 2015. Industrial Food Animal Production and Community Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0061-0.
    1. Egan D.
    2014. Dead zones haunt Green Bay as manure fuels algae blooms. September 13, 2014. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
    1. Erb K.,
    2. Ronk E.,
    3. Koundinya V.,
    4. Luczaj J.
    . 2015. Groundwater quality changes in a karst aquifer of northeastern Wisconsin, USA: Reduction of brown water incidence and bacterial contamination resulting from implementation of regional task force recommendations. Resources 4:655–672, doi:10.3390/resources4030655.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fagin D.
    2013. Toms River: A Story of Science and Salvation, 1st ed. Washington, DC: Bantam.
    1. Farm Foundation
    . 2012. Right-to-Farm Laws: History and Future. Oak Brook, IL: Farm Foundation.
    1. Friedman K.,
    2. Adesoji O.
    . 1999. Political Economy of Right-to-farm. EconBiz. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31:567–569.
    OpenUrl
    1. Goodner D.
    2016. Bacteria in Wisconsin's Drinking Water Is Public Health Concern. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Public Radio. http://www.wpr.org/bacteria-wisconsin%E2%80%99s-drinking-water-public-health-concern.
    1. Hanson A.C.
    2002. Brewing land use conflicts: Wisconsin's Right to Farm law. Wisconsin Lawyer 75.
    1. Huber B.
    2013. As Factory Farms Spread, Government Efforts to Curb Threat From Livestock Waste Bog Down - FairWarning. FairWarning. http://www.fairwarning.org/2013/05/as-factory-farms-spread-government-efforts-to-curb-threat-from-livestock-waste-bog-down/.
    1. Lockeretz W.
    1. Lapping M.B.,
    2. Leutwiler N.R.
    . 1987. Agriculture in conflict: Right-to-farm laws and the peri-urban milieu for farming. In Sustaining Agriculture Near Cities, ed. Lockeretz W., 211. Washington, DC: Soil and Water Conservation Service.
    1. Lockeretz W.
    1. Lisansky J.,
    2. Clark G.
    . 1987. Farmer–nonfarmer conflicts in the urban fringe: will right-to-farm help? In Sustaining Agriculture Near Cities, ed. Lockeretz W.. Washington, DC: Soil and Water Conservation Service.
    1. Midwest Environmental Advocates
    . 2011. Rosendale Dairy Case Summary. Madison, WI: Midwest Environmental Advocates. http://midwestadvocates.org/issues-actions/actions/rosendale-dairy/.
    1. Midwest Environmental Advocates
    . 2013. Protecting Your Community From Existing and Proposed Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs): A Guide to Legal Actions. Madison, WI: Midwest Environmental Advocates.
    1. Rodewald A.
    2015. Manure spills putting water supply at risk. Green Bay Press. February 6, 2015. http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/investigations/2015/02/06/manure-spills-water-supply/22983669/.
    1. Seely R.
    2014. Manure spraying under scrutiny. Water Watch Wisconsin. April 27, 2014. http://wisconsinwatch.org/2014/04/manure-spraying-under-scrutiny/.
    1. USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 2016. Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs). https://www.epa.gov/npdes/animal-feeding-operations-afos.
    1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2015. Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/plantsanimals/livestock/afo/.
    1. WDNR (Wisconsin Department of Natuarl Resouces)
    . 2016. CAFO and CAFO WPDES permit statistics. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/AgBusiness/CAFO/StatsMap.html.
  1. Wisconsin Blue Book. 2016. Wisconsin Blue Book: Chapter 8 – Agriculture Statistics (2015-2016).
    1. Zboreak V.
    2015. “Yes, in your backyard!” Model legislative efforts to prevent communities from excluding CAFOs. Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy 5:147–163.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 72 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 72, Issue 6
November/December 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Confined animal feeding operations and state-based right to farm laws: Managing twenty-first century agriculture with a twentieth century framework in the case of Wisconsin, United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Confined animal feeding operations and state-based right to farm laws: Managing twenty-first century agriculture with a twentieth century framework in the case of Wisconsin, United States
Amy A. Schultz, Harvey M. Jacobs
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2017, 72 (6) 133A-138A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.6.133A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Confined animal feeding operations and state-based right to farm laws: Managing twenty-first century agriculture with a twentieth century framework in the case of Wisconsin, United States
Amy A. Schultz, Harvey M. Jacobs
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2017, 72 (6) 133A-138A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.72.6.133A
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Global connections: A case for international perspectives
  • Climate and pest interactions pose a cross-landscape management challenge to soil and water conservation
  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
Show more A Section

Features

  • Global connections: A case for international perspectives
  • Climate and pest interactions pose a cross-landscape management challenge to soil and water conservation
  • Sustainable and regenerative agriculture: Tools to address food insecurity and climate change
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society