Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleA Section

Application of monitoring to inform policy and programs and achieve water quality goals

Lisa F. Duriancik, Katie Flahive and Deanna Osmond
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation January 2018, 73 (1) 11A-15A; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.1.11A
Lisa F. Duriancik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katie Flahive
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deanna Osmond
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

REFERENCES

    1. Osmond D.,
    2. Meals D.,
    3. Hoag D.,
    4. Arabi M.
    1. Arabi M.,
    2. Meals D.,
    3. Hoag D.
    . 2012. Watershed modeling in the NIFA-CEAP projects. In How to Build Better Agricultural Conservation Programs to Protect Water Quality: The National Institute of Food and Agriculture–Conservation Effects Assessment Project Experience, eds. Osmond D., Meals D., Hoag D., Arabi M.. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
    1. Chapman D.
    (ed). 1996. Water Quality Assessments—A Guide to Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring, 2nd Edition. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations Environment Program. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
    1. Davenport T.E.
    2003. The Watershed Project Management Guide. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
    1. Dressing S.A.,
    2. Kreglow J.M.,
    3. Maas R.P.,
    4. Koehler F.A.,
    5. Humenik F.J.,
    6. Snyder W.K.
    . 1983. The Model Implementation Program: Lessons Learned from Agricultural Water Quality Projects. Washington, DC: USDA and US Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. Dressing S.A.,
    2. Meals D.W.
    . 2005. Designing water quality monitoring programs for watershed projects, Tech Notes 2, July 2005. Developed for US Environmental Protection Agency by Tetra Tech, Inc. Fairfax, VA: Tetra Tech, Inc. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/technote2_wq_monitoring.pdf.
    1. Dressing S.A.,
    2. Meals D.W.,
    3. Harcum J.B.,
    4. Spooner J.,
    5. Stribling J.B.,
    6. Richards R.P.,
    7. Millard C.J.,
    8. Lanberg S.A.,
    9. O'Donnell J.G.
    . 2016. Monitoring and Evaluating Nonpoint Source Watershed Projects. EPA 841-R-16-010. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/nps_monitoring_guide_may_2016-combined_plain.pdf.
    1. Dubrovsky N.M.,
    2. Hamilton P.A.
    , 2010. Nutrients in the Nation's streams and groundwater: National Findings and Implications: US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2010-3078. Reston, Virginia: US Geological Survey. http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2010/3078/pdf/fs20103078.pdf.
    1. Duriancik L.F.,
    2. Bucks D.,
    3. Dobrowolski J.P.,
    4. Drewes T.,
    5. Eckles S.D.,
    6. Jolley L.,
    7. Kellogg R.L.,
    8. Lund D.,
    9. Makuch J.R.,
    10. O'Neill M.P.,
    11. Rewa C.A.,
    12. Walbridge M.R.,
    13. Parry R.,
    14. Weltz M.A.
    . 2008. The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63(6):185A–188A, doi:10.2489/jswc.63.6.185A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Easton Z.M.,
    2. Walter M.T.,
    3. Steenhuis T.S.
    . 2008. Combined monitoring and modeling indicate the most effective agricultural best management practices. Journal of Environmental Quality 37:1799-18009, doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0522.
    OpenUrl
    1. Edgell J.,
    2. Osmond D.L.,
    3. Line D.E.,
    4. Hoyt G.,
    5. Grossman J.M.,
    6. Larsen E.M.
    . 2015. Comparison of surface water quality and yields from organically and conventionally produced sweet corn plots with conservation and conventional tillage. Journal of Environmental Quality 44:1-10, doi:10.2134/jeq2015.02.0074.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gagnon S.R.,
    2. Makuch J.R.,
    3. Harper C.Y.
    . 2008. Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Fish and Wildlife: A Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Bibliography. Special Reference Briefs Series no. SRB 2008-01. Beltsville, MD: Water Quality Information Center, National Agricultural Library, USDA Agricultural Research Service.
    1. Gagnon S.R.,
    2. Makuch J.R.,
    3. Sherman T.J.
    . 2004. Environmental Effects of US Department of Agricultural Conservation Programs: A Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Bibliography. Special Reference Briefs Series no. SRB 2004-01. Beltsville, MD: Water Quality Information Center, National Agricultural Library, USDA Agricultural Research Service.
    1. Gale J.A.,
    2. Line D.E.,
    3. Osmond D.L.,
    4. Coffey S.W.,
    5. Spooner J.,
    6. Arnold J.A.,
    7. Hoban T.J.,
    8. Wimberley R.C.
    . 1993. Evaluation of the Experimental Rural Clean Water Program. EPA-841-R-93-005. Raleigh, NC: National Water Quality Evaluation Project, Water Quality Group, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, North Carolina State University.
    1. IGTF (Intergovernmental Task Force on Monitoring Water Quality)
    . 1995. Final Report of the Intergovernmental Task Force on Monitoring Water Quality. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-742. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1995/0742/report.pdf.
    1. Jackson-Smith D.B.,
    2. Halling M.,
    3. de la Hoz E.,
    4. McEvoy J.P.,
    5. Horsburgh J.S.
    . 2010. Measuring conservation program best management practice implementation and maintenance at the watershed scale. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(6):413-423, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.6.413.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jackson-Smith D.B.,
    2. McEvoy J.P.
    . 2011. Assessing the long-term impacts of water quality outreach and education efforts on landowners in the Little Bear River Watershed in northern Utah. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17(4):341-354.
    OpenUrl
    1. King S.E.,
    2. Osmond D.L.,
    3. Smith J.,
    4. Burchell M.R.,
    5. Dukes M.,
    6. Evans R.O.,
    7. Knies S.,
    8. Kunickis S.
    . 2016. Effects of riparian buffer vegetation and width: A 12-year longitudinal study. Journal of Environmental Quality 45(4):1243-1251, doi:10.2134/jeq2015.06.0321.
    OpenUrl
    1. Line D.E.,
    2. Osmond D.L.,
    3. Childres W.
    . 2016. Effectiveness of livestock exclusion in a pasture of central North Carolina. Journal of Environmental Quality 45:1926-1932, doi:10.2134/jeq2016.03.0089.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lizotte R.E. Jr..,
    2. Knight S.S.,
    3. Locke M.A.,
    4. Bingner R.L.
    . 2014. Influence of integrated watershed-scale agricultural conservation practices on lake water quality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(2):160-170, doi: 10.2489/jswc.69.2.160.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lombardo L.A.,
    2. Grabow G.L.,
    3. Spooner J.,
    4. Line D.E.,
    5. Osmond D.L.,
    6. Jennings G.D.
    . 2000. Section 319 Nonpoint Source National Monitoring Program Successes and Recommendations. Raleigh, NC: Water Quality Group, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, North Carolina State University. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/nmp_successes.pdf.
    1. Meals D.W.,
    2. Dressing S.A.,
    3. Davenport T.E.
    . 2010. Lag time in water quality response to best management practices: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 39:85-89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Osmond D.,
    2. Meals D.,
    3. Hoag D.,
    4. Arabi M.
    1. Meals D.W.,
    2. Osmond D.L.,
    3. Spooner J.,
    4. Line D.E.
    . 2012. Water quality monitoring: NIFA-CEAP projects. In How to Build Better Agricultural Conservation Programs to Protect Water Quality: The National Institute of Food and Agriculture–Conservation Effects Assessment Project Experience, ed. Osmond D., Meals D., Hoag D., Arabi M.. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
    1. Meals D.W.,
    2. Sutton J.D.
    . 1996. Assessment of Progress in Selected Water Quality Projects of USDA and State Cooperators. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Quality Management and Program Evaluation Division.
    1. MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency)
    . 2003. Volunteer Surface Water Monitoring Guide. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/volunteer-surface-water-monitoring-guide.
    1. Morrison J.,
    2. Lake J.
    . 1983. Environmental Impact of Land Use on Water Quality Black Creek Project–Final Report. Fort Wayne, IN: Allen County Soil and Water Conservation District.
    1. Olsen A.R.,
    2. Robertson D.M.
    . 2003. Monitoring design. Water Resources Impact 5(5):14–16.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Osmond D.,
    2. Meals D.,
    3. Hoag D.,
    4. Arabi M.
    . 2012. How to Build Better Agricultural Conservation Programs to Protect Water Quality: The National Institute of Food and Agriculture–Conservation Effects Assessment Project Experience. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
    1. Richards P.R.,
    2. Baker D.B.
    . 2002. Trends in water quality in LEASEQ rivers and stream (Northwester Ohio), 1975–1995. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:90-96.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. El-Shaarawi A.H.,
    2. Piegorsch W.W.
    1. Scott E.M.,
    2. Gemmell J.C.
    . 2013. Water quality assessment and European water framework directive. In Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, eds. El-Shaarawi A.H., Piegorsch W.W.. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
    1. Schnepf M.,
    2. Cox C.
    . 2006. Environmental Benefits of Conservation on Cropland: The Status of our Knowledge. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.
    1. Sharpley A.N.,
    2. Daniel T.C.,
    3. Gibson G.,
    4. Bundy L.,
    5. Cabrera M.,
    6. Sims J.T.,
    7. Stevens R.,
    8. Lemunyon J.,
    9. Kleinman P.J.A.,
    10. Parry R.
    . 2006. Best Management Practices to Minimize Agricultural Phosphorus Impacts on Water Quality. USDA Agricultural Research Service Publication 163. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
    1. Shepard R.
    2005. Nutrient management planning: Is it the answer to better management? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(4):171-176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smith T.A.,
    2. Osmond D.L.,
    3. Gilliam J.W.
    . 2006. Riparian buffer width and nitrate removal in a lagoon-effluent irrigated agricultural area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 61(5):273-281.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Spooner J.,
    2. Line D.E.
    . 1993. Effective monitoring strategies for demonstrating water quality changes from nonpoint source controls on a watershed scale. Water Science and Technology 28:143-148.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Spooner J.,
    2. Line D.E.,
    3. Meals D.,
    4. Grabow G.L.,
    5. Osmond D.L.
    . 2011. Summary Report: Section 319 National Monitoring Program Projects. Raleigh, NC: Nonpoint Source Watershed Project Studies, Water Quality Group, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, North Carolina State University. https://319monitoring.wordpress.ncsu.edu/states-with-projects/summary-report-full-report/.
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Locke M.A.
    . 2011. The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: A review of USDA-ARS's Conservation Effects Assessment Project Watershed Studies. Water Science and Technology 64:300-310, doi:10.2166/wst.2011.555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Sadler E.J.,
    3. Lizotte R.E.,
    4. Bryant R.B.,
    5. Potter T.L.,
    6. Moore M.T.,
    7. Veith T.L.,
    8. Baffaut C.,
    9. Locke M.A.,
    10. Walbridge M.R.
    . 2014. A decade of conservation effects assessment research by the USDA Agricultural Research Service: Progress overview and future outlook. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(5):365-373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. USDA NRCS (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service)
    . 2003. National Water Quality Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044775.pdf.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2012a. Conservation Practice Standard, Edge-Of-Field Water Quality Monitoring Data Collection and Evaluation Conservation Activity 201. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1097617.pdf.
    1. USDA NRCS
    . 2012b. Conservation Practice Standard, Edge-Of-Field Water Quality Monitoring Installation Conservation Activity 202. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1097618.pdf.
    1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)
    . 1997. Volunteer Stream Monitoring: A Methods Manual. EPA 841-B-97-003.Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/stream.pdf.
    1. USEPA
    . 2006. Elements of a State Water Monitoring and Assessment Program. EPA 841-B-03-003.Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://archive.epa.gov/water/archive/web/html/statemonitoring.html.
    1. USEPA
    . 2008. Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: An Update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-08-003.Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. USEPA
    . 2013. Nonpoint Source Program and Grants Guidelines for States and Territories. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/319-guidelines-fy14.pdf.
    1. USEPA
    . 2016. Nonpoint Source Success Stories. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/nps/nonpoint-source-success-stories.
    1. Van Meter K.J.,
    2. Basu N.B.,
    3. Veenstra J.J.,
    4. Burras C.L.
    . 2016. The nitrogen legacy: Emerging evidence of nitrogen accumulation in anthropogenic landscapes. Environmental Research Letters 11(3).
    1. Ward A.D.,
    2. Hatfield J.L.,
    3. Lamb J.A.,
    4. Alberts E.E.,
    5. Logan T.J.,
    6. Anderson J.L.
    . 1994. The management systems evaluation areas program: Tillage and water quality research. Soil and Tillage Research 30(1):49-74, doi: 10.1016/0167-1987(94)90150-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Ward R.C.,
    2. Loftus J.C.,
    3. McBride G.B.
    . 1990. Design of Water Quality Monitoring Systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    1. Williams M.R.,
    2. King K.W.,
    3. Ford W.,
    4. Fausey N.R.
    . 2016. Edge-of-field research to quantify the impacts of agricultural practices on water quality in Ohio. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71(1):9A-12A, doi: 10.2489/jswc.71.1.9A.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 73 (1)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 73, Issue 1
January/February 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Application of monitoring to inform policy and programs and achieve water quality goals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Application of monitoring to inform policy and programs and achieve water quality goals
Lisa F. Duriancik, Katie Flahive, Deanna Osmond
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2018, 73 (1) 11A-15A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.1.11A

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Application of monitoring to inform policy and programs and achieve water quality goals
Lisa F. Duriancik, Katie Flahive, Deanna Osmond
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Jan 2018, 73 (1) 11A-15A; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.1.11A
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantifying the impacts of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed assessments: The first fifteen years
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

A Section

  • Flooding: Management and risk mitigation
  • Twenty years of conservation effects assessment in the St. Joseph River watershed, Indiana
  • Developing cover crop systems for California almonds: Current knowledge and uncertainties
Show more A Section

Features

  • Youth water education: Programs and potential in the American Midwest
  • Working toward sustainable agricultural intensification in the Red River Delta of Vietnam
  • Soil science beyond COVID-19
Show more Features

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society