Water quality assessment in the Cherry Creek watershed: Patterns of nutrient runoff in an agricultural watershed

References

1. 1. Alarcon V.J.,
   2. O'Hara C.G.

   . 2010. Scale-dependency and sensitivity of hydrological estimations to land use and topography for a coastal watershed in Mississippi. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6016:491-500.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Alarcon V.J.,
   2. Sassenrath G.F.

   . 2015. Sensitivity of nutrient estimations to sediment wash-off using a hydrological model of Cherry Creek Watershed, Kansas. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9157:457-467.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Alarcon V.J.,
   2. Sassenrath G.F.

   . 2016. Modeling and simulating nutrient management practices for the Mobile River Watershed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9788:33-43.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Bernal E.

   2014. Chapter 3: Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantification Determination in Gas Chromatography. In Advances in Gas Chromatography. London: In Tech. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46058.pdf.
5. 1. Bicknell B.R.,
   2. Imhoff J.C.,
   3. Kittle J.L. Jr..,
   4. Donigian A.S. Jr..,
   5. Johanson R.C.

   . 1997. Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN, User's Manual for Version 11. EPA/600/R-97/080. Athens, GA: US Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory.
6. 1. Bockus W.W.,
   2. Appel J.A.,
   3. Bowdwn R.L.,
   4. Fritz A.K.,
   5. Gill B.S.,
   6. Martin T.J.,
   7. Sears R.G.,
   8. Seifers D.L.,
   9. Brown-Guedira G.L.,
   10. Eversmeyer M.G.

   . 2001. Success stories: Breeding for wheat disease resistance in Kansas. Plant Disease 85(5):453-461, http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.5.453.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Branson B.A.

   1967. Fishes of the Neosho River system in Oklahoma. The American Midland Naturalist 78(1):126-154.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. CDPH (Colorado Department of Public Health)

   . 2015. Detection Limits. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. http://www.coloradowaterdata.org/background_2013/fin/2013_AWQMS_GS_materials/ReportingDetectionLimits-Reg85_030115.pdf.
9. 1. City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

   2003. 258 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (N.D. Okla. 2003). US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma 258 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (N.D. Okla. 2003), March 14, 2003.
10. 1. DeLaune P.B.,
    2. Haggard B.E.,
    3. Daniel T.C.,
    4. Chaubey I.,
    5. Cochran M.J.

    . 2006. The Eucha/Spavinaw phosphorus index: A court mandated index for litter management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 61(2):96-105.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 1. Dong Z.,
    2. Lynch R.A.,
    3. Schaider L.A.

    . 2016. Key contributors to variations in fish mercury within and among freshwater reservoirs in Oklahoma, USA. Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts 18(2):222-236.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Dunne T.,
    2. Leopold L.B.

    . 1978. Water in Environmental Planning, 1st edition, 818. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
13. 1. GLCWAF (Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Watershed Alliance Foundation)

    . 2008. Grand Lake Watershed Plan for improving water quality throughout the Grand Lake Watershed. Draft. Grove, OK: Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Watershed Alliance Foundation. http://www.ok.gov/conservation/documents/Grand_Lake_%20WBP_DRAFT.pdf.
14. 1. Homer C.,
    2. Dewitz J.,
    3. Fry J.,
    4. Coan M.,
    5. Hossain N.,
    6. Larson C.,
    7. Herold N.,
    8. McKerrow A.,
    9. VanDriel J.N.,
    10. Wickham J.

    . 2007. Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 73(4):337-341. http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2001.php.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
15. 1. Hummel P.,
    2. Kittle J. Jr..,
    3. Gray M.

    . 2001. WDMUtil Version 2.0, A Tool for Managing Watershed Modeling Time-Series Data User's Manual, Contract No. 68-C-98-010, Work Assignment No. 2-05. Decatur, GA: Aqua Terra Consultants.
16. 1. Solomon S.,
    2. Qin D.,
    3. Manning M.,
    4. Chen Z.,
    5. Marquis M.,
    6. Averyt K.B.,
    7. Tignor M.,
    8. Mille H.L.

    1. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)

    . 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, eds. Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K.B., Tignor M., Mille H.L.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. 1. Jin S.,
    2. Yang L.,
    3. Danielson P.,
    4. Homer C.,
    5. Fry J.,
    6. Xian G.

    . 2013. A comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011. Remote Sensing of Environment 132:159-175.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Juracek K.E.

    2008. Sediment storage and severity of contamination in a shallow reservoir affected by historical lead and zinc mining. Environmental Geology 54(7):1447-1463.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
19. 1. KDHE (Kansas Department of Health and Environment)

    . 2002. Neosho Basin Total Maximum Daily Load. Topeka, KS: Kansas Department of Health and Environment. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/CherryCr_DO.pdf.
20. 1. KDHE

    . 2007. Guidelines for investigating and remediating nitrate/ammonia contamination from agricultural chemical releases. Kansas Bureau of Environmental Remediation/Remedial Section Policy. BER policy #BER-RS-050 (January 2007). Topeka, KS: Kansas Department of Health and Environment. http://www.kdheks.gov/ber/policies/BER_RS_50.pdf.
21. 1. KDHE

    . 2015. Kansas surface water quality standards: Tables of numeric criteria. Topeka, KS: Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Bureau of Water. http://www.kdheks.gov/water/download/tables_of_numeric_criteria.pdf.
22. 1. KDHE

    . 2017a. Neosho Basin Total Maximum Daily Load. Topeka, KS: Kansas Department of Health and Environment. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/ne/CherryCr_DO.pdf.
23. 1. KDHE

    . 2017b. Low Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring Sites in Southeast Kansas. Topeka, KS: Kansas Department of Health and Environment. http://www.kdheks.gov/tmdl/download/eval_assessment/SE_KS_LowDissolvedOxygen.pdf.
24. 1. Kittle J.L. Jr..,
    2. Lumb A.M.,
    3. Hummel P.R.,
    4. Duda P.B.,
    5. Gray M.H.

    . 1998. A tool for the generation and analysis of model simulation scenarios for watersheds (GenScn): US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4134. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.
25. 1. Leikam D.F.,
    2. Lamond R.E.,
    3. Mengel D.B.

    . 2003. Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Recommendations. Kansas State University, MF-2586. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. http://www.bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/MF2586.pdf.
26. 1. Li Z.,
    2. Liu M.,
    3. Zhao Y.,
    4. Liang T.,
    5. Sha J.,
    6. Wang Y.

    . 2014. Application of regional nutrient management model in Tunxi catchment: In support of the trans-boundary eco-compensation in eastern China. Clean Soil, Air, Water 42:1729-1739, doi:10.1002/clen.201300380.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Manders G.C.,
    2. Aber J.S.

    . 2014. Tri-State Mining District legacy in northeastern Oklahoma. Emporia State Research Studies 49(2):29-51. http://academic.emporia.edu/esrs/vol49/manders_aber.pdf.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. MCEA (Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy)

    . 2010. Minnesota Nutrient Criteria Development for Rivers. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-s6-08.pdf.
29. 1. MCEA

    . 2013. Numeric nutrient standards for rivers and streams: Part IB. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-rule4-08g.pdf.
30. 1. McKinney D.C.

    2011. Transboundary water challenges: Case studies. Prepared for US Department of State, Foreign Service Institute, and University of Texas at Austin. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/mckinney/ce397/readings/transboundarywaterissues.pdf.
31. 1. Mignogna L.J.,
    2. Runyon W.A.,
    3. Nairn R.W.,
    4. Strosnider W.H.

    . 2012. Preliminary assessment of floodplain soil metal concentrations, Neosho River, Oklahoma, 379-388. 29th Annual National Conference of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, June 8-15, 2012, Tupelo, Mississippi.
32. 1. MNW (Middle Neosho Watershed)

    . 2011. Middle Neosho—9 Element Watershed Plan Summary. Topeka, KS: Kansas Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy. http://www.kswraps.org/files/attachments/middleneosho_plansummary.pdf.
33. 1. MRLC (Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium)

    . 2016. National Land Cover Dataset 1992 (NLCD1992). https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd92_data.php.
34. 1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Van Liew M.W.,
    4. Bingner R.L.,
    5. Harmel R.D.,
    6. Veith T.L.

    . 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3):885-900.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Starks P.J.

    . 2010. Effects of the resolution of soil dataset and precipitation dataset on SWAT 2005 streamflow calibration parameters and simulation accuracy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(2):63-78, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.2.63.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 1. Ouyang Y.,
    2. Leininger T.D.,
    3. Moran M.

    . 2013. Impacts of reforestation upon sediment load and water outflow in the Lower Yazoo River Watershed, Mississippi. Ecological Engineering 61:394-406.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Ouyang Y.,
    2. Leininger T.D.,
    3. Moran M.

    . 2015. Estimating effects of reforestation on nitrogen and phosphorus load reductions in the Lower Yazoo River Watershed, Mississippi. Ecological Engineering 75:449-456.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. OWRB (Oklahoma Water Resources Board)

    . 2001. Segregating water quality degradation of Grand Lake between tributaries and land use features. Oklahoma City, OK: State of Oklahoma Water Resources Board. https://www.owrb.ok.gov/studies/reports/reports_pdf/GrandLakeTribReport-v1-2a.pdf.
39. 1. Padedda B.M.,
    2. Sechi N.,
    3. Lai G.G.,
    4. Mariani M.A.,
    5. Pulina S.,
    6. Satta C.T.,
    7. Bazzoni A.M.,
    8. Virdis T.,
    9. Buscarinu P.,
    10. Lugliè A.

    . 2015. A fast-response methodological approach to assessing and managing nutrient loads in eutrophic Mediterranean reservoirs. Ecological Engineering 85:47-55.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Parajuli P.,
    2. Jayakody P.,
    3. Sassenrath G.F.,
    4. Ouyang Y.,
    5. Pote J.W.

    . 2013. Assessing the impacts of crop-rotation and tillage on crop yields and sediment yield using a modeling approach. Agricultural Water Management 119:32-42.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Pierce F.J.,
    2. Larson W.E.,
    3. Dowdy R.H.,
    4. Graham W.A.P.

    . 1983. Assessing long-term changes due to erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38(1):39-44.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
42. 1. Pimentel D.

    2006. Soil erosion: A food and environmental threat. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8:119-137.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. 1. Reilly J.F.,
    2. Horne A.J.,
    3. Miller C.D.

    . 1999. Nitrate removal from a drinking water supply with large free-surface constructed wetlands prior to groundwater recharge. Ecological Engineering 14(1-2):33-47.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Searcy J.K.

    1959. Flow-Duration Curves. Manual of Hydrology: Part 2. Low-Flow Techniques. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1542-A. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. http://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/1542a/report.pdf.
45. 1. Terrado M.,
    2. Borrell E.,
    3. de Campos S.,
    4. Barcelo D.,
    5. Tauler R.

    . 2010. Surface-water-quality indices for the analysis of data generated by automated sampling networks. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29(1):40-52.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Tomer M.D.,
    2. Porter S.A.,
    3. James D.E.,
    4. Boomer K.M.B.,
    5. Kostel J.A.,
    6. McLellan E.

    . 2013. Combining precision conservation technologies into a flexible framework to facilitate agricultural watershed planning. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(5):113A-120A, doi:10.2489/jswc.68.5.113A.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
47. 1. Tomlinson P.J.,
    2. Savin M.C.,
    3. Moore P.A. Jr..

    2015. Long-term applications of untreated and alum-treated poultry litter drive soil nitrogen concentrations and associated microbial community dynamics. Biology and Fertility of Soils 51(1):43-55.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Tomlinson P.J.,
    2. Shoup D.,
    3. Ruiz Diaz D.

    . 2014. Poultry litter: Nutrient availability, value, and storage practices. K-State Extension Agronomy eUpdate. 486. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University. https://webapp.agron.ksu.edu/agr_social/eu_article.throck?article_id=406.
49. 1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2002. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report: TMDL Document for Cherry Creek. TMDL ID: 3522. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. http://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_impaired_waters.tmdl_report?p_tmdl_id=3522&p_tribe=&p_report_type=.
50. 1. USEPA

    . 2006. IDL-MDL-PQL. Region III Quality Assurance Factsheet. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/whatthel.pdf.
51. 1. USEPA

    . 2008. BASINS Technical Note 10: Using the BASINS Meteorological Database (Version 2006). Washington, DC: Office of Water of the US Environmental Protection Agency, Document 4305. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/2009_04_13_basinss_tecnote10.pdf.
52. 1. USEPA

    . 2010. Limits below Quantification Levels: Permit guidance 9. Statutory reference: ORC 6111.13. Rule reference: OAC 3745-33-07(C), November 8, 2010. Columbus, OH: Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water.
53. 1. USEPA

    . 2013. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Exposure Research Laboratory. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/models/basins/index.cfm.
54. 1. USEPA

    . 2016. Table of Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. Drinking Water Contaminants: Standards and Regulations. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/your-drinking-water/table-regulated-drinking-water-contaminants.
55. 1. USGS (US Geological Survey)

    . 2014. NLCD 2001 to 2011 Land Cover Change Pixels (2011 edition, amended 2014). National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) Land Use Land Cover. Sioux Falls, SD: US Geological Survey. http://www.mrlc.gov.
56. 1. Wayman C.,
    2. Gordon E.,
    3. King G.

    . 1999. The Method Detection Limit and Practical Quantitation Level: Their Derivations and Regulatory Implications. 1999 Waste Management Symposia. http://www.wmsym.org/archives/1999/12/12-5.pdf.
57. 1. Wouters P.

    2013. International Law—Facilitating Transboundary Water Cooperation. TEC Background Papers. No. 17. Stockholm, Sweden: Global Water Partnership. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2363809.