Conservation Reserve Program enrollment decisions in the Prairie Pothole Region

References

1. 1. Allen A.W.,
   2. Vandever M.W.

   . 2003. A National Survey of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Participants on Environmental Effects, Wildlife Issues, and Vegetation Management on Program Lands. No. USGS/BRD/BSR-2OO3-OOO1. Fort Collins, Colorado: Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center.
2. 1. Allison P.D.,
   2. Christakis N.A.

   . 1994. Logit models for sets of ranked items. Sociological Methodology 24:199-228.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Baker J.S.,
   2. Galik C.S.

   . 2009. Policy Options for the Conservation Reserve Program in a Low-Carbon Economy. Durham, NC: Climate Change Policy Partnership, Duke University.
4. 1. Beggs S.,
   2. Cardell S.,
   3. Hausman J.

   . 1981. Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics 17(1):1-19.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Chapman R.G.,
   2. Staelin R.

   . 1982. Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of Marketing Research 19(3):288-301.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Christensen T.,
   2. Pederson A.B.,
   3. Nielsen H.O.,
   4. Mørkbaka M.R.,
   5. Haslerb B.H.,
   6. Denvera S.

   . 2011. Determinants of farmers' willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones - A choice experiment study. Ecological Economics 70(8):1558-1564.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Cooper J.C.,
   2. Osborn C.T.

   . 1998. The effect of rental rates on the extension of Conservation Reserve Program contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1):184-194.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Ducos G.,
   2. Dupraz P.,
   3. Bonnieux F.

   . 2009. Agri-environment contract adoption under fixed and variable compliance costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52(5):669-687.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Espinosa-Goded M.,
   2. Barreiro-Hurlé J.,
   3. Ruto E.

   . 2010. What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(2):259-273.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Ferris J.,
    2. Siikamäki J.

    . 2009. Conservation Reserve Program and Wetland Reserve Program: Primary Land Retirement Programs for Promoting Farmland Conservation. Washington, DC: RFF Backgrounder, Resources for the Future.
11. 1. Gill-Austern D.

    2011. The impact of rising corn prices on the Conservation Reserve Program: An empirical model. Undergraduate Economic Review 7(1):22.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Gustafson C.,
    2. Hill C.L.

    . 1993. Future Land Use Decisions of North Dakota Conservation Reserve Program Participants. Agricultural Economics Report 23191. Fargo, ND: Agricultural Experiment Station, North Dakota State University.
13. 1. Hatley M.L.,
    2. Ervin R.T.,
    3. Davis B.

    . 1989. Socioeconomic characteristics of participants in the CRP: Texas High Plains. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(5):510-512.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. Hausman J.A.,
    2. McFadden D.

    . 1984. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica 25(5):1219-1240.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Hausman J.A.,
    2. Ruud P.A.

    . 1987. Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data. Journal of Econometrics 34(1):83-104.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Hellerstein D.R.,
    2. Higgins N.,
    3. Roberts M.

    . 2015. Options for Improving Conservation Programs: Insights from Auction Theory and Economic Experiments. USDA Economic Research Service Report Number 181. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
17. 1. Hellerstein D.R.,
    2. Malcolm S.A.

    . 2011. The Influence of Rising Commodity Prices on the Conservation Reserve Program. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
18. 1. Hodur N.,
    2. Leistritz F.L.,
    3. Bangsund D.

    . 2002. Local Socioeconomic Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 476. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University.
19. 1. Jacobs K.L.,
    2. Thurman W.N.,
    3. Marra M.C.

    . 2011. How farmers bid into the conservation reserve program: An empirical analysis of CRP offers data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, July 24-26, 2011.
20. 1. Kalaitzandonakes N.,
    2. Monson M.

    . 1994. An analysis of potential conservation effort of CRP participants in the state of Missouri: A latent variable approach. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26(1):200-208.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Kraus S.

    1997. Researchers at Northern Prairie Science Center will present information at national conference. The Jamestown Sun, Saturday, February 8, 1997. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/news/press/ducksymp.htm.
22. 1. Krinsky I.,
    2. Robb A.L.

    . 1986. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4):715-719.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Lambert D.,
    2. Sullivan P.

    . 2006. Land retirement and working-land conservation structures: A look at farmers' choices. Amber Waves 4(3):16.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Lancaster K.J.

    1966. A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy 74(2):132-157.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Lancsar E.,
    2. Savage E.

    . 2004. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: Inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Economics 13(9):901-907.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 1. Langpap C.

    2006. Conservation of endangered species: Can incentives work for private landowners? Ecological Economics 57(4):558-572.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Louviere J.J.,
    2. Hensher D.A.,
    3. Swait J.D.

    . 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. 1. Manski C.F.

    1977. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8(3):229-254.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Arrow Kenneth,
    2. et al.

    1. Marschak J.

    1960. Binary-choice constraints and random utility indicators. In Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences, ed. Arrow Kenneth, et al., 312-329. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. 1. Zarembka P.

    1. McFadden D.

    1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka P., 105-142. New York: Academic Press.
31. 1. McFadden D.,
    2. Train K.

    . 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15:447-470.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. McLean-Meyinsse P.E.,
    2. Hui J.,
    3. Josephy R.

    . 1994. An empirical analysis of Louisiana small farmers' involvement in the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26(2):379-385.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. McLeod D.,
    2. Miller S.,
    3. Perry G.

    . 1998-1999. Opportunities for efficient agricultural policy and producer decision making: A comparison of the returns to Oregon dryland wheat production with Conservation Reserve Program payments. Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 1998-1999:70-77.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. O'Brien D.

    2003. Summary and Evolution of US Farm Bill Conservation Titles - Expanded Discussions. Fayetteville, AR: The National Agricultural Law Center. http://nationalaglawcenter.org/farmbills/conservation/expanded-discussions/.
35. 1. Onianwa O.,
    2. Wheelock G.,
    3. Hendrix S.

    . 1999. Factors affecting conservation practice behavior of CRP participants in Alabama. Journal of Agribusiness 17(2):149-160.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Punj G.N.,
    2. Staelin R.

    . 1978. The choice process for graduate business schools. Journal of Marketing Research 15(4):588-598.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Ruto E.,
    2. Garrod G.

    . 2009. Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52(5):631-647.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Secchi S.,
    2. Babcock B.A.

    . 2007. Impact of High Crop Prices on Environmental Quality: A Case of Iowa and the Conservation Reserve Program. Ames, IA: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University.
39. 1. Soil and Water Conservation Society and Environmental Defense Fund

    . 2008. Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Program Assessment. Ankeny, IA, and New York: Soil and Water Conservation Society and Environmental Defense Fund.
40. 1. Thurstone L.L.

    1927. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review 34(4):273.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. 1. Train K.E.

    2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42. 1. USDA

    . 2014. 2012 Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USDA Census of Agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/.
43. 1. Wachenheim C.J,
    2. Lesch W.C.,
    3. Dhingra N.

    . 2014. The Conservation Reserve Program: A Literature Review. Agriculture and Applied Economics Report No. 723. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University.