Evaluation of seven mulch treatments for erosion control and vegetation establishment on steep slopes

References

1. 1. Akbarzadeh A.,
   2. Mehrjardi R.T.,
   3. Refahi H.G.,
   4. Rouhipour H.,
   5. Gorji M.

   . 2009. Application of soil conditioners and man-made erosion control materials to reduce erosion risk on sloping lands. African Journal of Plant Science Volume 3(4):74-84.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Babcock D.L.

   2008. Performance of mulches and polyacrylamide for erosion control and vegetative establishment. Master of Science thesis, North Carolina State University.
3. 1. Babcock D.L.,
   2. McLaughlin R.A.

   . 2011. Runoff water quality and vegetative establishment for groundcovers on steep slopes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 66(2):132-141, doi:10.2489/jswc.66.2.132.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Babcock D.L.,
   2. McLaughlin R.A.

   . 2013. Erosion control effectiveness of straw, hydromulch, and polyacrylamide in a rainfall simulator. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68(3):219-225, doi:10.2489/jswc.68.3.221.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Benik S.R.,
   2. Wilson B.N.,
   3. Biesboer D.D.,
   4. Hansen B.,
   5. Stenlund D.

   . 2003a. Evaluation of erosion control products using natural rainfall events. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 58(2):98-105.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Benik S.R.,
   2. Wilson B.N.,
   3. Biesboer D.D.,
   4. Hansen B.,
   5. Stenlund D.

   . 2003b. Performance of erosion control products on a highway embankment. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 46(4):1113-1119.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Bochet E.,
   2. García-Fayos P.

   . 2004. Factors controlling vegetation establishment and water erosion on motorway slopes in Valencia, Spain. Restoration Ecology 12(2):166-174.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Clesceri L.S.,
   2. Greenberg A.E.,
   3. Eaton A.D.

   . 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edition, 257-258. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation.
9. 1. Dane J.H.,
   2. Topp G.C.,
   3. Al-Amoodi L.K.

   . 2004. Methods of Soil Analysis: Physical Methods. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
10. 1. Flanagan D.C.,
    2. Chaudhari K.,
    3. Norton L.D.

    . 2002a. Polyacrylamide soil amendment effects on runoff and sediment yield on steep slopes: Part I. Simulated rainfall conditions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 45(5):1327-1337.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Flanagan D.C.,
    2. Chaudhari K.,
    3. Norton L.D.

    . 2002b. Polyacrylamide soil amendment effects on runoff and sediment yield on steep slopes: Part II. Natural rainfall conditions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 45(5):1339-1351.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Dane J.H.,
    2. Topp G.C.

    1. Gee G.W.,
    2. Or D.

    . 2002. Particle size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 4, Physical Methods, ed. Dane J.H., Topp G.C., 255-293. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
13. 1. Green V.S.,
    2. Stott D.E.,
    3. Norton L.D.,
    4. Graveel J.G.

    . 2000. Polyacrylamide molecular weight and charge effects on infiltration under simulated rainfall. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64(5):1786-1791.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Greenberg A.E.,
    2. Leonore S.C.,
    3. Eaton A.D.

    . 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation.
15. 1. Hayes S.A.,
    2. McLaughlin R.A.,
    3. Osmond D.L.

    . 2005. Polyacrylamide use for erosion and turbidity control on construction sites. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(4):193-199.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. Holt G.,
    2. Buser M.,
    3. Harmel D.,
    4. Potter K.,
    5. Pelletier M.

    . 2005. Comparison of cotton-based hydro-mulches and conventional wood and paper hydro-mulches: Study 1. The Journal of Cotton Science 9:121-127.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Lee G.

    2012. Comparison of five hydromulches and polyacrylamide to straw for erosion control and vegetation establishment on steep slopes. Master's thesis, North Carolina State University Department of Soil Science. http://catalog.lib.ncsu.edu/record/NCSU2713517.
18. 1. Lee S.S.,
    2. Gantzer C.J.,
    3. Thompson A.L.,
    4. Anderson S.H.

    . 2010. Polyacrylamide and gypsum amendments for erosion and runoff control on two soil series. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(4):233-242, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.4.233.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. 1. Lemly A.D.

    1982. Erosion control at construction sites on red clay soils. Environmental Management 6(4):343-352.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
20. 1. Linde D.T.,
    2. Watschke T.L.

    . 1997. Nutrients and sediment in runoff from creeping bentgrass and perennial ryegrass turfs. Journal of Environmental Quality 26:1248-1254.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Mannering J.V.,
    2. Meyer L.D.

    . 1963. The effect of various rates of surface mulch on infiltration and erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal 27:84-86.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. McLaughlin R.A.,
    2. Brown T.T.

    . 2006. Evaluation of erosion control products with and without added polyacrylamide. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42(3):675-684.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Mostaghimi S.,
    2. Gidley T.M.,
    3. Dillaha T.A.,
    4. Cooke R.A.

    . 1994. Effectiveness of different approaches for controlling sediment and nutrient losses from eroded land. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49(6):615-620.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 1. Partington M.,
    2. Mehuys G.

    . 2005. Effectiveness of polyacrylamide in reducing soil erosion on steep slopes. Paper No. 052052. Paper presented at the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual Meeting. Tampa, FL, July 17-20, 2005.
25. 1. Peterson J.R.,
    2. Flanagan D.C.,
    3. Tishmack J.K.

    . 2002. PAM application method and electrolyte source effects on plot-scale runoff and erosion. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 45(6):1859-1867.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Rice P.J.,
    2. Horgan B.P.

    . 2011. Nutrient loss with runoff from fairway turf: An evaluation of core cultivation practices and their environmental impact. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30(11):2473-2480.

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. 1. Roa-Espinosa A.,
    2. Bubenzer G.D.,
    3. Miyashita E.S.

    . 1999. Sediment and runoff control on construction sites using four application methods of polyacrylamide mix. Paper presented at the American Society of Agricultural Engineers/Canadian Society of Agricultural Engineers-SCGR Annual International Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 18-21, 1999.
28. 1. SCONC (State Climate Office of North Carolina)

    . 2017. 1971-2000 Climate Normals. Raleigh, NC: State Climate Office of North Carolina. http://sco-web1.meas.ncsu.edu/cronos/normals.php.
29. 1. Sojka R.E.,
    2. Bjorneberg D.L.,
    3. Entry J.A.,
    4. Lentz R.D.,
    5. Orts W.J.

    . 2007. Polyacrylamide in agriculture and environmental land management. Advances in Agronomy 92:75-162.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Soupir M.L.,
    2. Mostaghimi S.,
    3. Masters A.,
    4. Flahive K.A.,
    5. Vaughan D.H.,
    6. Mendez A.,
    7. McClellan P.W.

    . 2004. Effectiveness of polyacrylamide (PAM) in improving runoff water quality from construction sites. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40(1):53-66.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2005. Stormwater Phase II Final Rule. EPA 833-F-00-008. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/fact2-6.pdf.
32. 1. USEPA

    . 2012a. Watershed Assessment, Tracking, and Environmental Results: National Summary of State Information. Washington, DC; US Environmental Protection Agency. http://ofmpub.epa.gov/waters10/attains_nation_cy.control.
33. 1. USEPA

    . 2012b. Construction General Permit (CGP) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Discharges from Construction Activities. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/cgp2012_finalpermit.pdf.
34. 1. USEPA

    . 2016. National Rivers and Streams Assessment. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/national-aquatic-resource-surveys/nrsa.
35. 1. Vacher C.A.,
    2. Loch R.J.,
    3. Raine S.R.

    . 2003. Effect of polyacrylamide additions on infiltration and erosion of disturbed lands. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41:1509-1520.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
36. 1. Whitley K.D.

    2011. Evaluation of polyacrylamide for improvement in soil infiltration and field evaluation of hydromulches for water quality and vegetation establishment. Master's thesis, North Carolina State University Department of Soil Science.
37. 1. Yu J.T.,
    2. Shainberg L.I.,
    3. Mamedov A.I.,
    4. Levy G.J.

    . 2003. Infiltration and erosion in soils treated with dry pam and gypsum. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67(2):630-636.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science