Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Spatial optimization of watershed best management practices based on slope position units

C.-Z. Qin, H.-R. Gao, L.-J. Zhu, A-X. Zhu, J.-Z. Liu and H. Wu
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation September 2018, 73 (5) 504-517; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.5.504
C.-Z. Qin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.-R. Gao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.-J. Zhu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A-X. Zhu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-Z. Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Ajami H.,
    2. Khan U.,
    3. Tuteja N.K.,
    4. Sharma A.
    . 2016. Development of a computationally efficient semi-distributed hydrologic modeling application for soil moisture, lateral flow and runoff simulation. Environmental Modelling and Software 85(November):319-331.
    OpenUrl
    1. Arabi M.,
    2. Govindaraju R.S.,
    3. Hantush M.M.,
    4. Engel B.A.
    . 2006. Role of watershed subdivision on modeling the effectiveness of best management practices with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42(2):513-528.
    OpenUrl
    1. Arnold J.G.,
    2. Allen P.M.,
    3. Volk M.,
    4. Williams J.R.,
    5. Bosch D.D.
    . 2010. Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 53(5):1433-1443.
    OpenUrl
    1. Arnold J.G.,
    2. Srinivasan R.,
    3. Muttiah R.S.,
    4. Williams J.R.
    . 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1):73-89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Aston A.
    1979. Rainfall interception by eight small trees. Journal of Hydrology 42(3):383-396.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Longley P.,
    2. Goodchild M.,
    3. Maguire D.,
    4. Rhind D.
    1. Band L.
    1999. Spatial hydrography and landforms. In GIS: Management Issues and Applications, ed. Longley P., Goodchild M., Maguire D., Rhind D., 527-542. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Berry J.K.,
    2. Delgado J.A.,
    3. Pierce F.J.,
    4. Khosla R.
    . 2005. Applying spatial analysis for precision conservation across the landscape. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):363-370.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bi W.,
    2. Dandy G.C.,
    3. Maier H.R.
    . 2015. Improved genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution system design by incorporating domain knowledge. Environmental Modelling and Software 69(July):370-381.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bieger K.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Rathjens H.,
    4. White M.J.,
    5. Bosch D.D.,
    6. Allen P.M.,
    7. Volk M.,
    8. Srinivasan R.
    . 2016. Introduction to SWAT+, a completely restructured version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 53(1):115-130.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bosch D.D.,
    2. Truman C.C.,
    3. Potter T.L.,
    4. West L.T.,
    5. Strickland T.C.,
    6. Hubbard R.K.
    . 2012. Tillage and slope position impact on field-scale hydrologic processes in the South Atlantic Coastal Plain. Agricultural Water Management 111(August):40-52.
    OpenUrl
    1. Cai Q.G.,
    2. Zhu A.X.,
    3. Bi H.X.,
    4. Sun L.Y.
    . 2012. Paradigms for integrated soil and water conservation over main water erosions in China. Beijing: China Water Power Press (in Chinese).
    1. Chang C.L.,
    2. Chiueh P.T.,
    3. Lo S.L.
    . 2007. Effect of spatial variability of storm on the optimal placement of best management practices (BMPs). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 135(December):383-389.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Chen Z.Q.,
    2. Chen Z.B.,
    3. Bai L.Y.,
    4. Zeng Y.
    . 2017. A catastrophe model to assess soil restoration under ecological restoration in the red soil hilly region of China. Pedosphere 27(4):778-787.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chen Z.B.,
    2. Chen Z.Q.,
    3. Yue H.
    . 2013. Comprehensive research on soil and water conservation in granite red soil region: A case study of Zhuxi watershed, Changting County, Fujian province. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).
    1. Chen S.F.,
    2. Zha X.
    . 2016. Evaluation of soil erosion vulnerability in the Zhuxi watershed, Fujian Province, China. Natural Hazards 82(3):1589-1607.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chichakly K.J.,
    2. Bowden W.B.,
    3. Eppstein M.J.
    . 2013. Minimization of cost, sediment load, and sensitivity to climate change in a watershed management application. Environmental Modelling and Software 50(December):158-168.
    OpenUrl
    1. Cunge J.A.
    1969. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research 7(2):205-230.
    OpenUrl
    1. Deb K.,
    2. Pratap A.,
    3. Agarwal S.,
    4. Meyarivan T.
    . 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2):182-197.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Duinker P.N.,
    2. Greig L.A.
    . 2007. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27(3):206-219.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Engel B.,
    2. Storm D.,
    3. White M.,
    4. Arnold J.,
    5. Arabi M.
    . 2007. A hydrologic/water quality model application. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43(5):1223-1236.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Fortin F.A.,
    2. DeRainville F.M.,
    3. Gardner M.A.,
    4. Parizeau M.,
    5. Gagné C.
    . 2012. DEAP: Evolutionary algorithms made easy. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13(July):2171-2175.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fujian Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Station,
    2. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,
    3. Fujian Normal University,
    4. Changting Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Station
    . 2010. Monitoring report of soil and water loss in Changting County. Fuzhou, Fujian, China (in Chinese).
    1. Gaddis E.J.B.,
    2. Voinov A.,
    3. Seppelt R.,
    4. Rizzo D.M.
    . 2014. Spatial optimization of best management practices to attain water quality targets. Water Resources Management 28(6):1485-1499.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Geng R.,
    2. Zhang G.H.,
    3. Ma Q.H.,
    4. Wang H.
    . 2017. Effects of landscape positions on soil resistance to rill erosion in a small catchment on the Loess Plateau. Biosystems Engineering 160(August):95-108.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gitau M.W.,
    2. Veith T.L.,
    3. Gburek W.J.
    . 2004. Farm-level optimization of BMP placement for cost-effective pollution reduction. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 47(6):1923-1931.
    OpenUrl
    1. Goddard T.W.
    2005. An overview of precision conservation in Canada. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):456-461.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wilson M.J.,
    2. He Z.L.,
    3. Yang X.E.
    1. He Z.L.,
    2. Zhang M.K.,
    3. Wilson M.J.
    . 2004. Distribution and classification of red soils in China. In The Red Soils of China: Their Nature, Management and Etilization, ed. Wilson M.J., He Z.L., Yang X.E., 29-33. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    1. Heathwaite L.,
    2. Sharpley A.,
    3. Gburek W.
    . 2000. A conceptual approach for integrating phosphorus and nitrogen management at watershed scales. Journal of Environmental Quality 29(1):158-166.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Hernandez-Santana V.,
    2. Zhou X.,
    3. Helmers M.J.,
    4. Asbjornsen H.,
    5. Kolka R.,
    6. Tomer M.
    . 2013. Native prairie filter strips reduce runoff from hillslopes under annual row-crop systems in Iowa, USA. Journal of Hydrology 477(January):94-103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
    1. Hold-Geoffroy Y.,
    2. Gagnon O.,
    3. Parizeau M.
    . 2014. Once you SCOOP, no need to fork. In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment, Atlanta, GA, July 13-18, 2014. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
    1. Jiang P.,
    2. Anderson S.H.,
    3. Kitchen N.R.,
    4. Sadler E.J.,
    5. Sudduth K.A.
    . 2007. Landscape and conservation management effects on hydraulic properties of a claypan-soil toposequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71(3):803-811.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kalcic M.M.,
    2. Chaubey I.,
    3. Frankenberger J.
    . 2015a. Defining Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrologic response units (HRUs) by field boundaries. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 8(3):69-80.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kalcic M.M.,
    2. Frankenberger J.,
    3. Chaubey I.
    . 2015b. Spatial optimization of six conservation practices using SWAT in tile-drained agricultural watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 51(4):956-972.
    OpenUrl
    1. Linsley R.K.,
    2. Kohler M.A.,
    3. Paulhus J.L.H.
    . 1975. Hydrology for Engineers, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    1. Liu Y.B.
    2004. Development and application of a GIS-based distributed hydrological model for flood prediction and watershed management. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
    1. Liu Y.B.,
    2. Gebremeskel S.,
    3. DeSmedt F.,
    4. Hoffmann L.,
    5. Pfister L.
    . 2003. A diffusive transport approach for flow routing in GIS-based flood modeling. Journal of Hydrology 283(1-4):91-106.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Liu J.Z.,
    2. Zhu A.X.,
    3. Liu Y.B.,
    4. Zhu T.X.,
    5. Qin C.Z.
    . 2014. A layered approach to parallel computing for spatially distributed hydrological modeling. Environmental Modelling and Software 51(January):221-227.
    OpenUrl
    1. Liu J.Z.,
    2. Zhu A.X.,
    3. Qin C.Z.,
    4. Wu H.,
    5. Jiang J.C.
    . 2016. A two-level parallelization method for distributed hydrological models. Environmental Modelling and Software 80(June):175-184.
    OpenUrl
    1. Maier H.R.,
    2. Kapelan Z.,
    3. Kasprzyk J.,
    4. Kollat J.,
    5. Matott L.S.,
    6. Cunha M.C.,
    7. Dandy G.C.,
    8. Gibbs M.S.,
    9. Keedwell E.,
    10. Marchi A.,
    11. Ostfeld A.,
    12. Savic D.,
    13. Solomatine D.P.,
    14. Vrugt J.A.,
    15. Zecchin A.C.,
    16. Minsker B.S.,
    17. Barbour E.J.,
    18. Kuczera G.,
    19. Pasha F.,
    20. Castelletti A.,
    21. Giuliani M.,
    22. Reed P.M.
    . 2014. Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions. Environmental Modelling and Software 62(December):271-299.
    OpenUrl
    1. Maringanti C.,
    2. Chaubey I.,
    3. Arabi M.,
    4. Engel B.
    . 2011. Application of a multi-objective optimization method to provide least cost alternatives for NPS pollution control. Environmental Management 48(3):448-461.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Miller B.A.,
    2. Schaetzl R.J.
    . 2015. Digital classification of hillslope position. Soil Science Society of America Journal 79(January):132-145.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
    1. Moriasi D.N.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Van Liew M.W.,
    4. Bingner R.L.,
    5. Harmel R.D.,
    6. Veith T.L.
    . 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3):885-900.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mudgal A.,
    2. Baffaut C.,
    3. Anderson S.H.,
    4. Sadler E.J.,
    5. Thompson A.L.
    . 2010. APEX model assessment of variable landscapes on runoff and dissolved herbicides. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 53(4):1047-1058.
    OpenUrl
    1. Neitsch S.L.,
    2. Arnold J.G.,
    3. Kiniry J.R.,
    4. Williams J.R.
    . 2011. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute.
    1. O'Callaghan J.F.,
    2. Mark D.M.
    . 1984. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 28(3):323-344.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Panagopoulos Y.,
    2. Makropoulos C.,
    3. Mimikou M.
    . 2012. Decision support for diffuse pollution management. Environmental Modelling and Software 30(April):57-70.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pennock D.J.
    2005. Precision conservation for co-management of carbon and nitrogen on the Canadian prairies. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):396-401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pennock D.J.,
    2. Zebarth B.J.,
    3. DeJong E.
    . 1987. Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geoderma 40(3-4):297-315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Priestley C.,
    2. Taylor R.
    . 1972. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly Weather Review 100(2):81-92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Pyo J.,
    2. Baek S.S.,
    3. Kim M.,
    4. Park S.,
    5. Lee H.,
    6. Ra J.S.,
    7. Cho K.H.
    . 2017. Optimizing Agricultural Best Management Practices in a Lake Erie watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 53(6):1281-1292.
    OpenUrl
    1. Qin C.Z.,
    2. Zhu A.X.,
    3. Shi X.,
    4. Li B.L.,
    5. Pei T.,
    6. Zhou C.H.
    . 2009. Quantification of spatial gradation of slope positions. Geomorphology 110(3-4):152-161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
    1. Qin C.Z.,
    2. Zhu A.X.,
    3. Qiu W.L.,
    4. Lu Y.J.,
    5. Li B.L.,
    6. Pei T.
    . 2012. Mapping soil organic matter in small low-relief catchments using fuzzy slope position information. Geoderma 171-172(February):64-74.
    OpenUrl
    1. Rodriguez H.G.,
    2. Popp J.,
    3. Maringanti C.,
    4. Chaubey I.
    . 2011. Selection and placement of best management practices used to reduce water quality degradation in Lincoln Lake watershed. Water Resources Research 47(1):1-13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sahu M.,
    2. Gu R.R.
    . 2009. Modeling the effects of riparian buffer zone and contour strips on stream water quality. Ecological Engineering 35(8):1167-1177.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Saxton K.E.,
    2. Rawls W.J.
    . 2006. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70(5):1569-1578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Schmidt J.,
    2. Hewitt A.
    . 2004. Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position. Geoderma 121(3-4):243-256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
    1. Srivastava P.,
    2. Hamlett J.M.,
    3. Robillard P.D.
    . 2003. Watershed optimization of agricultural best management practices: Continuous simulation versus design storms. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39(5):1043-1054.
    OpenUrl
    1. Swanson F.J.,
    2. Kratz T.K.,
    3. Caine N.,
    4. Woodmansee R.G.
    . 1988. Landform effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. BioScience 38(2):92-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Turpin N.,
    2. Bontems P.,
    3. Rotillon G.,
    4. Bärlund I.,
    5. Kaljonen M.,
    6. Tattari S.,
    7. Feichtinger F.,
    8. Strauss P.,
    9. Haverkamp R.,
    10. Garnier M.
    . 2005. AgriBMPWater: Systems approach to environmentally acceptable farming. Environmental Modelling and Software 20(2):187-196.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Veith T.L.,
    2. Wolfe M.L.,
    3. Heatwole C.D.
    . 2004. Cost-effective BMP placement: Optimization versus targeting. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 47(5):1585-1594.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wang X.Q.
    2008. Comprehensive benefits evaluation of soil erosion control models and establishing the control paradigm in red soil region. Master dissertation, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China (in Chinese with English abstract).
    1. Williams J.R.
    1975. Sediment-yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor. In Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yield and Sources, 244-252. Washington, DC: USDA.
    1. Williams J.R.
    1980. SPNM, a model for predicting sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen yields from agricultural basins. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 16(5):843-848.
    OpenUrl
    1. Singh V.P.
    1. Williams J.R.
    1995. The EPIC model. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, ed. Singh V.P., 909-1000. Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
    1. Wu H.,
    2. Zhu A.X.,
    3. Liu J.Z.,
    4. Liu Y.B.,
    5. Jiang J.C.
    . 2018. Best management practices optimization at watershed scale: Incorporating spatial topology among fields. Water Resources Management 32(1):155-177, doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1801-8.
    OpenUrl
    1. Xie J.,
    2. Qin C.Z.,
    3. Xiao G.R.,
    4. Yang L.,
    5. Lei Q.L.,
    6. Liu J.Z.,
    7. Zhu A.X.
    . 2015. Soil property mapping using fuzzy clustering method in small watershed of the red soil region in southern China: A case study of Zhuxi watershed. Science of Soil and Water Conservation 13(5):132-139 (in Chinese with English abstract).
    OpenUrl
    1. Yang G.X.,
    2. Best E.P.H.
    . 2015. Spatial optimization of watershed management practices for nitrogen load reduction using a modeling-optimization framework. Journal of Environmental Management 161(September):252-260.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zhu L.J.,
    2. Zhu A.X.,
    3. Qin C.Z.,
    4. Liu J.Z.
    . 2018. Automatic approach to deriving fuzzy slope positions. Geomorphology 304(March):173-183, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.12.024.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zitzler E.,
    2. Laumanns M.,
    3. Thiele L.
    . 2001. SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. Zurich, Switzerland: Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK) Department of Electrical Engineering Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH).
    1. Zitzler E.,
    2. Thiele L.
    . 1999. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3(4):257-271.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zitzler E.,
    2. Thiele L.,
    3. Laumanns M.,
    4. Fonseca C.M.,
    5. da Fonseca V.G.
    . 2003. Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: An analysis and review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 7(2):117-132.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 73 (5)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 73, Issue 5
September/October 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spatial optimization of watershed best management practices based on slope position units
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Spatial optimization of watershed best management practices based on slope position units
C.-Z. Qin, H.-R. Gao, L.-J. Zhu, A-X. Zhu, J.-Z. Liu, H. Wu
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2018, 73 (5) 504-517; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.5.504

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Spatial optimization of watershed best management practices based on slope position units
C.-Z. Qin, H.-R. Gao, L.-J. Zhu, A-X. Zhu, J.-Z. Liu, H. Wu
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Sep 2018, 73 (5) 504-517; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.5.504
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Smart control of agricultural water wells in western Iran: Application of the Q-methodology
  • Soil health through farmers’ eyes: Toward a better understanding of how farmers view, value, and manage for healthier soils
  • Policy process and problem framing for state Nutrient Reduction Strategies in the US Upper Mississippi River Basin
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society