Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

Effects of cover crops on soil quality: Part II. Soil exchangeable bases (potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium), cation exchange capacity, and soil micronutrients (zinc, manganese, iron, copper, and boron)

V. Sharma, S. Irmak and J. Padhi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2018, 73 (6) 652-668; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.73.6.652
V. Sharma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Irmak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Padhi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Maintaining and conserving essential soil nutrients using soil management practices, such as incorporating cover crops and no-tillage into crop rotation, has the potential to improve soil quality and fertility as well soil productivity. The effects of cover crops in a no-tillage seed maize (Zea mays L.) production system on soil exchangeable bases and soil micronutrients were investigated in Beaver Crossing (Seward County), Nebraska. The main objective of the research was to investigate the effects of growing cover crops under conservation tillage on soil exchangeable bases (potassium [K], magnesium [Mg], calcium [Ca], and sodium [Na]), cation exchange capacity (CEC), and soil micronutrients (zinc [Zn], copper [Cu], boron [B], iron [Fe], and manganese [Mn]). Extensive field research was conducted in four cover crop growing seasons (2012 to 2013, 2013 to 2014, 2014 to 2015, and 2015 to 2016) on three center pivot-irrigated seed maize or soybean (Glycine max L.) and cover crop rotation large-scale production fields. While extensive soil samples were taken to quantify and analyze the changes in soil exchangeable bases and soil micronutrients from the beginning of 2012 to the end of 2015, all large-scale production fields had cover crops in either seed maize or soybean rotation since 2002. Thus, it is anticipated that the changes in soil exchangeable bases, CEC, and micronutrients are a result of long-term (from early 2002 to late 2015) cover crop impacts on soil in all three research fields. The treatment effects exhibited variation not only between the treatments, but also between the soil layers for the same treatment. Cover crops in seed maize or soybean treatment (SCCC) had a significant effect on soil exchangeable K in the topsoil (0 to 5 cm soil layer). Cover crops did not affect exchangeable K concentration below the 5 cm soil layer. Exchangeable Ca concentrations were unaffected by any land cover treatment imposed in this research. Incorporating cover crops into a no-tillage seed maize or soybean cropping system (SCCC) might help in maintaining the exchangeable Mg concentration more effectively than no cover crop treatment (SC), especially in the 20 to 40 cm soil layer. Cover cropping has significant effects on CEC in the 5 to 40 cm soil depth. At the 5 to 20 cm soil depth, the SCCC treatment resulted in increased CEC by 8.4%, whereas bare soil, cover crop only without seed maize or soybean residue (CC), and SC treatments resulted in 10%, 4.1%, and 21% reduction in CEC, respectively. The SCCC treatment reduced the concentration of micronutrients in the topsoil (0 to 5 cm soil layer). Overall, cover crops (SCCC) have the potential in maintaining the optimum levels of Zn, B, Fe, and Mn in the topsoil (0 to 5 cm soil layer) as compared to the SC treatment. The results of this research suggest that cover cropping has the potential to alter several very important soil chemical properties (and significantly in some cases); however, the impacts primarily occur in the topsoil.

  • © 2018 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 73 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 73, Issue 6
November/December 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of cover crops on soil quality: Part II. Soil exchangeable bases (potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium), cation exchange capacity, and soil micronutrients (zinc, manganese, iron, copper, and boron)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Effects of cover crops on soil quality: Part II. Soil exchangeable bases (potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium), cation exchange capacity, and soil micronutrients (zinc, manganese, iron, copper, and boron)
V. Sharma, S. Irmak, J. Padhi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2018, 73 (6) 652-668; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.6.652

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Effects of cover crops on soil quality: Part II. Soil exchangeable bases (potassium, magnesium, sodium, and calcium), cation exchange capacity, and soil micronutrients (zinc, manganese, iron, copper, and boron)
V. Sharma, S. Irmak, J. Padhi
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2018, 73 (6) 652-668; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.73.6.652
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Cover crop impact on crop production and nutrient loss in a no-till terrace topography
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society