Delineation of tile-drain networks using thermal and multispectral imagery—Implications for water quantity and quality differences from paired edge-of-field sites

References

1. 1. Allred B.,
   2. Eash N.,
   3. Freeland R.,
   4. Martinez L.,
   5. Wishart D.

   . 2019. Effective and efficient agricultural drainage pipe mapping with UAS thermal infrared imagery: A case study. Agricultural Water Management 197:132-137.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Allred B.J.,
   2. Fausey N.R.,
   3. Peters J.L.,
   4. Chen C.,
   5. Daniels J.J.,
   6. Youn H.

   . 2004. Detection of buried agricultural drainage pipe with geophysical methods. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 20(3):307.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
3. 1. Baker N.T.,
   2. Stone W.W.,
   3. Wilson J.T.,
   4. Meyer M.T.

   . 2006. Occurrence and transport of agricultural chemicals in Leary Weber Ditch basin, Hancock County, Indiana, 2003-04. Scientific Investigations Report 50. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
4. 1. Capel P.D.,
   2. Wolock D.M.,
   3. Coupe R.H.,
   4. Roth J.L.

   . 2019. A conceptual framework for effectively anticipating water-quality changes resulting from changes in agricultural activities. Scientific Investigations Report. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
5. 1. Cuadra P.E.,
   2. Vidon P.

   . 2011. Storm nitrogen dynamics in tile-drain flow in the US Midwest. Biogeochemistry 104(1):293-308.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Fausey N.R.,
   2. Brown L.C.,
   3. Belcher H.W.,
   4. Kanwar R.S.

   . 1995. Drainage and water quality in Great Lakes and Cornbelt states. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 121(4):283-288.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Gentry L.E.,
   2. David M.B.,
   3. Royer T.V.,
   4. Mitchell C.A.,
   5. Starks K.M.

   . 2007. Phosphorus transport pathways to streams in tile-drained agricultural watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality 36(2):408-415.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 1. Gökkaya K.,
   2. Budhathoki M.,
   3. Christopher S.F.,
   4. Hanrahan B.R.,
   5. Tank J.L.

   . 2017. Subsurface tile drained area detection using GIS and remote sensing in an agricultural watershed. Ecological Engineering 108:370-379.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Hirsch R.,
   2. DeCicco L.,
   3. Lorenz D.,
   4. Read J.,
   5. Carr L.,
   6. Watkins D.

   . 2017. dataRetrieval - Retrieval functions for USGS and EPA hydrologic and water Quality data. 2.6.7. https://github.com/USGS-R/dataRetrieval.
10. 1. Ho J.C.,
    2. Michalak A.M.

    . 2015. Challenges in tracking harmful algal blooms: A synthesis of evidence from Lake Erie. Journal of Great Lakes Research 41(2):317-325.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Homer C.H.,
    2. Fry J.A.,
    3. Barnes C.A.

    . 2012. The National Land Cover Database. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
12. 1. IDEM (Indiana Department of Environmental Management)

    . 2016. Appendix P: Finalized 2016 303(D) List of Impaired Waters [XLS]. Water Quality Assessments and Reporting. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Environmental Management. https://in.gov/idem/nps/2647.htm.
13. 1. Indiana Office of Information Technology

    . 2012. Indiana Statewide Imagery and LiDAR Program - 1-ft pixel. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Office of Information Technology. www.indianamap.org.
14. 1. Lorenz D.

    2015. smwrGraphs - Graphing Functions. 1.1.1. https://github.com/USGS-R/.
15. 1. Maccoux M.J.,
    2. Dove A.,
    3. Backus S.M.,
    4. Dolan D.M.

    . 2016. Total and soluble reactive phosphorus loadings to Lake Erie: A detailed accounting by year, basin, country, and tributary. Journal of Great Lakes Research 42(6):1151-1165.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. MicaSense Inc.

    2015. MicaSense RedEdge. I. Seattle, WA: MicaSense.
17. 1. Naz B.S.,
    2. Ale S.,
    3. Bowling L.C.

    . 2009. Detecting subsurface drainage systems and estimating drain spacing in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Agricultural Water Management 96(4):627-637.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. PIX4D

    . 2019. Thermal Projects FAQ. https://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000173463-Processing-thermal-images#label3.
19. 1. R Core Team

    . 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
20. 1. Robertson D.M.,
    2. Saad D.A.

    . 2011. Nutrient inputs to the Laurentian Great Lakes by source and watershed estimated using SPARROW watershed models. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47(5):1011-1033.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 1. Smith D.R.,
    2. King K.W.,
    3. Johnson L.,
    4. Francesconi W.,
    5. Richards P.,
    6. Baker D.,
    7. Sharpley A.N.

    . 2015. Surface runoff and tile drainage transport of phosphorus in the midwestern United States. Journal of Environmental Quality 44(2):495-502.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 1. Stuntebeck T.D.,
    2. Komiskey M.J.,
    3. Owens D.W.,
    4. Hall D.W.

    . 2008. Methods of data collection, sample processing, and data analysis for edge-of-field, streamgaging, subsurface-tile, and meteorological stations at discovery farms and pioneer farm in Wisconsin, 2001-7. USGS 2008-1015. Open-File Report. Middleton, WI: US Geological Survey, Wisconsin Water Science Center.
23. 1. Stuntebeck T.D.,
    2. Komiskey M.J.,
    3. Peppler M.C.,
    4. Owens D.W.,
    5. Frame D.R.

    . 2011. Precipitation-runoff relations and water-quality characteristics at edge-of-field stations, Discovery Farms and Pioneer Farm, Wisconsin, 2003-8. Scientific Investigations Report. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
24. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2016. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for Allen County, IN. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx.
25. 1. USEPA (Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 1972. Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq. (1972). Washington, DC: USEPA.
26. 1. USGS (US Geological Survey)

    . 2016. GLRI Edge-of-Field Monitoring. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey. https://wim.usgs.gov/geonarrative/glri-eof/.
27. 1. USGS

    . 2017. National Water Information System—Web interface (NWIS). Washington, DC: US Geological Survey. https://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.
28. 1. Vidon P.,
    2. Cuadra P.E.

    . 2010. Impact of precipitation characteristics on soil hydrology in tile-drained landscapes. Hydrological Processes 24(13):1821-1833.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
29. 1. Williamson T.N.,
    2. Meyer S.M.

    . 2019. Low-altitude multispectral and thermal-infrared imagery from agricultural fields, Black Creek basin, Allen County, IN—spring 2017. Data Release. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7Q81C9V.
30. 1. Zambrano-Bigiarini M.

    2017. hydroTSM - Time series management, analysis, and interpolation for hydrological modelling. Version 0.5-1. https://github.com/hzambran/hydroTSM.
31. 1. Zucker L.A.,
    2. Brown L.C.

    . 1998. Agricultural drainage: Water quality impacts and subsurface drainage studies in the Midwest. Extension Bulletin. Ohio State University 871: 40. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.

    OpenUrl