An improved excavation method for measuring bulk density of rocky soil using terrestrial LiDAR

References

1. 1. Klute A.

   1. Blake G.R.,
   2. Hartge K.H.

   . 1986. Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, ed. Klute A., 363-375. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
2. 1. DeLong C.,
   2. Skousen J.,
   3. Pena-Yewtukhiw E.

   . 2012. Bulk density of rocky mine soils in forestry reclamation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76:1810-1815, doi:10.2136/sssaj2011.0380n.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
3. 1. Eltner A.,
   2. Baumgart P.

   . 2015. Accuracy constraints of terrestrial LiDAR data for soil erosion measurement: Application to a Mediterranean field plot. Geomorphology 245:243-254, doi:10.1016/j. geomorph.2015.06.008.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
4. 1. Flint A.L.,
   2. Childs S.

   . 1984. Delelopment and calibration of an irregular hole bulk density sampler. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48:374-378, doi:10.2136/sss aj1984.03615995004800020030x.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
5. 1. Nearing M.A.,
   2. Nichols M.H.,
   3. Stone J.J.,
   4. Renard K.G.,
   5. Simanton J.R.

   . 2007. Sediment yields from unit-source semiarid watersheds at Walnut Gulch. Water Resources Research 43:W06426, doi:06410.01029/02006WR005692.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Page-Dumroese D.S.,
   2. Jurgensen M.F.,
   3. Brown R.E.,
   4. Mroz G.D.

   . 1999. Comparison of methods for determining bulk densities of rocky forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63:379-383.

   OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Riegl

   . 2018. RiSCAN PRO 2.0, Companoin Software to 3D Terrestrial Scanners. Horn, Austria: Riegl. http://www.riegl.com/products/software-packages/riscan-pro/.
8. 1. Rossi A.M.,
   2. Hirmas D.R.,
   3. Graham R.C.,
   4. Sternberg P.D.

   . 2008. Bulk density determination by automated three-dimensional laser scanning. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72:1591-1593, doi:10.2136/sssaj2008.0072N.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Schmid T.,
   2. Hildebrand E.

   . 2004. A case study of terrestrial laser scanning in erosion research: Calculation of roughness and volume balance at a logged forest site. International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XXXVI-8/W2:114-118.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Soane B.D.,
    2. Campbell D.J.,
    3. Herkes S.M.

    . 1971. Hand-held gamma-ray transmission equipment for measurment of bulk density of field soils. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 16:146-156, doi:10.1016/s0021-8634(71)80029-x.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Starr J.L.,
    2. Parkin T.B.,
    3. Meisinger J.J.

    . 1995. Influence of sample siza on chemical and physical soil measurements. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59:713-719, doi:10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900030012x.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
12. 1. Throop H.L.,
    2. Archer S.R.,
    3. Monger H.C.,
    4. Waltman S.

    . 2012. When bulk density methods matter: Implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils. Journal of Arid Environments 77:66-71, doi:10.1016/j. jaridenv.2011.08.020.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Turner R.M.,
    2. Panciera R.,
    3. Tanase M.A.,
    4. Lowell K.,
    5. Hacker J.M.,
    6. Walker J.P.

    . 2014. Estimation of soil surface roughness of agricultural soils using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sensing of Environment 140:107-117, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.030.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service)

    . 2003. Soil Survey of Cochise County, Arizona, Douglas-Tombstone Part. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
15. 1. Vosselman G.,
    2. Maas H.-G.

    . 2010. Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning.Caithness, Scotland: Whittles Publishing.