Soil carbon and bulk density distribution within 10 Southern Piedmont grazing systems

References

1. 1. Ball D.M.,
   2. Hoveland C.S.,
   3. Lacefield G.D.

   . 2007. Southern Forages: Modern Concepts for Forage Crop Management, 4th edition. Peachtree Corners, GA: International Plant Nutrition Institute.
2. 1. Bhatti J.S.,
   2. Bauer I.E.

   . 2002. Comparing loss-on-ignition with dry combustion as a method for determining carbon content in upland and lowland forest ecosystems. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33:3149-3430.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Butler D.M.,
   2. Franklin D.H.,
   3. Cabrera M.L.,
   4. Risse L.M.,
   5. Radcliffe D.E.,
   6. West L.T.,
   7. Gaskin J.W.

   . 2010. Assessment of the Georgia Phosphorus Index on-farm at the field scale for grassland management. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 65(3):200-210, doi:10.2489/jswc.65.3.200.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 1. Culman S.W.,
   2. Snapp S.S.,
   3. Freeman M.A.,
   4. Schipanski M.E.,
   5. Beniston J.,
   6. Lal R.,
   7. Drinkwater L.E.,
   8. Franzlubbers A.J.,
   9. Glover J.D.,
   10. Grandy S.A.,
   11. Lee J.,
   12. Six J.,
   13. Maul J.E.,
   14. Mirsky S.B.,
   15. Spargo S.B.,
   16. Wander M.M.

   . 2012. Permanganate oxidizable carbon reflects a processed soil fraction that is sensitive to management. Soil Science Society of America Journal (76):494-504
5. 1. Dalzell B.J.,
   2. Filley T.R.,
   3. Harbor J.M.

   . 2007. The role of hydrology in annual organic carbon loads and terrestrial organic matter export from a Midwestern agricultural watershed. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 71:1448-1462.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Dahal S.,
   2. Franklin D.H.,
   3. Cabrera M.L.,
   4. Hancock D.W.,
   5. Stewart L.,
   6. Ney L.C.,
   7. Subedi A.,
   8. Mahmud K.

   . 2018. Spatial distribution of inorganic nitrogen in pastures as affected by management, landscape, and cattle locus. Journal of Environmental Quality 47:1468-1477.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. De-Vos B.,
   2. Vandecasteele B.,
   3. Deckers J,
   4. Muys B.

   . 2005. Capability of loss-on-ignition as a predictor of total organic carbon in non-calcareous forest soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36:2899-2921.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Hurisso T.T.,
   2. Culman S.W.,
   3. Howarth W.R.,
   4. Wade J.,
   5. Cass D.,
   6. Beniston J.W.,
   7. Bowles T.M.,
   8. Grandy A.S.,
   9. Fanzluebbers A.J.,
   10. Schipanski M.E.,
   11. Lucas S.T.,
   12. Ugarte C.M.

   . 2016. Comparison of permanganate-oxidizable carbon and mineralizable carbon for assessment of organic matter stabilization and mineralization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 80:1352–1364.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Jones A.C.

   1983. Effect of soil texture on crictical bulk densities for root growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47:1208-1211.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Konen M.E.,
    2. Jacobs P.M.,
    3. Burras C.L.,
    4. Talaga B.J.,
    5. Mason J.A.

    . 2002. Equations for predicting soil organic carbon using loss-on-ignition for North Central US soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:1878-1881.

    OpenUrlGeoRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Marriott E.E.,
    2. Wander M.M.

    . 2006. Total and labile soil organic matter in organic and conventional farming systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70(3):950-959.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Paine L.K.,
    2. Undersander D.,
    3. Casler M.D.

    . 1999. Pasture growth, production, and quality under rotational and continuous grazing management. Journal of Production Agriculture 12(4):569-577.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Reynolds W.D.,
    2. Drury C.F.,
    3. Tan C.S.,
    4. Fox C.A.,
    5. Yang S.M.

    . 2009. Use of indicators and pore volume-function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma 152:252-263.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
14. 1. Sharma K.L.,
    2. Raju K.R.,
    3. Das S.K.,
    4. Prasad Rao B.R.C.,
    5. Kulkarni B.S.,
    6. Srinivas K.,
    7. Kusuma Grace J.,
    8. Madhavi M.,
    9. Gajbhiye P.N.

    . 2009. Soil fertility and quality assessment under tree-, crop-, and pasture-based land-use systems in a rainfed environment. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 40:1436-1461.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Sparling G.P.

    1992. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30(2):195-207.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Unger P.W.,
    2. Kasper T.C.

    . 1994. Soil compaction and root growth: A review. Agronomy Journal 86:759-766.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. USDA

    . 2004. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Invest. Rep. 42. Version 4.0. November 2004. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd1026807.pdf.
18. 1. USDA ERS (Economic Research Service)

    . 2013. Beef cattle information and statistics. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/statistics-information.aspx.
19. 1. Magdoff F.,
    2. Weil R.R.

    1. Wander M.

    2004. Soil organic matter fractions and their relevance to soil function. In Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture, eds. Magdoff F., Weil R.R., 67-102. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
20. 1. Weil R.R.,
    2. Islam K.R.,
    3. Stine M.A.,
    4. Gruver J.B.,
    5. Samson-Liebig S.E.

    . 2003. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18(1):3-17.

    OpenUrl