Legacy sediment erosion hot spots: A cost-effective approach for targeting water quality improvements

REFERENCES

1. 1. Allcott H.

   2011. Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics 95:1082–1095.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program)

   . 2019. Featured Publications. Annapolis, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/what/publications/wetland_expert_panel_recommendation%20s_for_non_tidal_wetland_bmps.
3. 1. Ferraro P.J.,
   2. Price M.K.

   . 2013. Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics 95:64–73

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Fleming P.M.

   2019. Cost effectiveness of legacy sediment mitigation at Big Spring Run in comparison to other best management practices in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Lancaster, PA: Water Science Institute.
5. 1. Garnache C.,
   2. Swinton S.M.,
   3. Herriges J.A.,
   4. Lupi F.,
   5. Stevenson R.J.

   . 2016. Solving the phosphorus puzzle: Synthesis and directions for future research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98:1334-1359.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Gellis A.C.,
   2. Brakebill J.W.

   . 2013. Science summary—Sediment sources and transport in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: US Geological Survey web summary. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. https://chesapeake.usgs.gov/documents/ss-sedimentsourcesandtransport.pdf.
7. 1. Hartranft J.L.,
   2. Merritts D.J.,
   3. Walter R.C.,
   4. Rahnis M.

   . 2011. Big Spring Run restoration experiment: Policy, geomorphology, and aquatic ecosystems in the Big Spring Run watershed, Lancaster County, PA. Sustain 24:24–30.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Inamdar S.,
   2. Johnson E.R.,
   3. Rowland R.D.,
   4. Walter R.,
   5. Merritts D.

   . 2017. Freeze-thaw processes and intense rainfall: The one-two punch for high sediment and nutrient loads from Mid-Atlantic watersheds. Biogeochemistry 141(3):333-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0417-7.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Jones C.,
   2. Branosky E.,
   3. Selman M.,
   4. Perez M.

   , 2010. How nutrient trading could help restore the Chesapeake Bay. Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
10. 1. Kaufman Z.,
    2. Abler D.,
    3. Shortle J.,
    4. Harper J.,
    5. Hamlett J.,
    6. Feather P.

    . 2014. Agricultural costs of the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load. Environmental Science and Technology 48:14131-14138.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Keisman J.,
    2. Blomquist J.,
    3. Bohlke J.K.,
    4. Davis-Martin J.,
    5. Dennison W.,
    6. Friedrichs C.,
    7. Murphy R.,
    8. Phillips S.,
    9. Testa J.,
    10. Trentacoste E.,
    11. Weller D.

    . 2018. Integrating Recent Findings to Explain Water-Quality Change: Support for the Mid-Point Assessment and Beyond. STAC Publication Number 18-005. Edgewater, MD: Chesapeake Bay Program, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee.
12. 1. Langland M.J.

    2019. Removal of legacy sediment and effects on streamflow, nutrient, and sediment concentrations and sediment loads at Big Spring Run, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, 2009-15, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report. Reston, VA: US Geological Society.
13. 1. Massoudieh A.,
    2. Gellis A.,
    3. Banks W.S.,
    4. Wieczorek M.E.

    . 2012. Suspended sediment source apportionment in Chesapeake Bay watershed using Bayesian chemical mass balance receptor modeling. Hydrological Processes 27(24):3363-3374, doi:10.1002/hyp.9429.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. McCann L.,
    2. Claassen R.

    . 2016. Farmer transaction costs of participating in federal conservation programs: Magnitudes and determinants. Land Economics 92:256-272.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 1. Sharpley A.,
    2. Jarvie H.P.,
    3. Buda A.,
    4. May L.,
    5. Spears B.,
    6. Kleinman P.

    , 2013. Phosphorus legacy: Overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. Journal of Environmental Quality 42:1308–1326.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 1. Shortle J.S.,
    2. Horan R.D.

    , 2017. Nutrient pollution: A wicked challenge for economic instruments. Water Economics and Policy 3:1-39.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency)

    . 2010. Discounting future benefits and costs. In Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses, Chapter 6. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-09/documents/ee-0568-06.pdf.
18. 1. USGS (US Geological Survey)

    . 2003. Residence times and nitrate transport in ground water discharging to streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Water Resources Investigations Report 03-4035. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
19. 1. Voli M.T.,
    2. Merritts D.J.,
    3. Walter R.C.,
    4. Ohlson E.,
    5. Datin K.,
    6. Rahnis M.,
    7. Kratz L.,
    8. Deng W.,
    9. Hilgartner W.,
    10. Hartranft J.

    . 2009. Preliminary reconstruction of pre-European settlement valley bottom wetland, southeastern Pennsylvania. Water Resources IMPACT 11:11-13.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
20. 1. Voli M.T.,
    2. Wegmann K.W.,
    3. Bohnensteihl D.R.,
    4. Leithold E.,
    5. Osburn C.L.,
    6. Polyakov V.

    . 2013. Fingerprinting the sources of suspended sediment delivery to a large municipal drinking water reservoir: Falls Lake, Neuse River, North Carolina. Journal of Soils and Sediments 13:1692-1707.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
21. 1. Walter R.C.,
    2. Merritts D.J.

    . 2008. Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science 319:299–304, doi:10.1126/science.1151716.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. Walter R.C,
    2. Merritts D.J.,
    3. Rahnis M.,
    4. Gellis A.,
    5. Hartranft J.,
    6. Mayer P.,
    7. Langland M.,
    8. Forshay K.,
    9. Weitzman J.,
    10. Schwarz E.,
    11. Bai Y.,
    12. Blair A.,
    13. Carter A.,
    14. Sosenko Daniels S.,
    15. Lewis E.,
    16. Ohlson E.,
    17. Peck E.,
    18. Shilling A.,
    19. Schulte K.,
    20. Smith D.,
    21. Stein Z.,
    22. Verna D.,
    23. Wilson E.

    . 2017. Sediment budgets and sources inform novel valley bottom restoration practice impacted by legacy sediment. 2017 Fall Meeting, American Geophysical Union, New Orleans, LA. https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm17/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/281212.
23. 1. Walter R.C.,
    2. Merritts D.J.,
    3. Rahnis M.,
    4. Langland M.,
    5. Galeone D.,
    6. Gellis A.,
    7. Hilgartner W.,
    8. Bowne D.,
    9. Wallace J.,
    10. Mayer P.,
    11. Forshay K.

    . 2013. Big Spring Run natural floodplain, stream, and riparian wetland. Final Report to Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
24. 1. Wieland R.,
    2. Parker D.,
    3. Gans W.,
    4. Martin A.

    . 2009. Costs and cost efficiencies for some nutrient reduction practices in Maryland. Annapolis, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chesapeake Bay Office and Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
25. 1. Wilson R.S.,
    2. Howard G.,
    3. Burnett E.A.

    . 2014. Improving nutrient management practices in agriculture: The role of risk-based beliefs in understanding farmers' attitudes toward taking additional action. Water Resources Research 50:6735–6746.

    OpenUrlGeoRef