Assessment of the Soil Conservation Service–Curve Number method performance in a tropical Oxisol watershed

References

1. 1. Ajmal M.,
   2. Ahn J.H.,
   3. Kim T.W.

   . 2016a. Excess stormwater quantification in ungauged watersheds using an event-based modified NRCS model. Water Resources Management 30(4):1433-1448.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Ajmal M.,
   2. Kim T.W.

   . 2014. Quantifying excess storm water using SCS-CN–based rainfall runoff models and different curve number determination methods. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 141(3):04014058.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Ajmal M.,
   2. Kim T.W.,
   3. Ahn J.H.

   . 2016b. Stability assessment of the curve number methodology used to estimate excess rainfall in forest-dominated watersheds. Arabic Journal of Geosciences 9(5):402-407.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Ajmal M.,
   2. Moon G.,
   3. Ahn J.H.,
   4. Kim T.W.

   . 2015a. Investigation of SCS-CN and its inspired modified models for runoff estimation in South Korean watersheds. Journal of Hydro-environment Research 9(4):592-603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.11.003.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Ajmal M.,
   2. Waseem M.,
   3. Ahn J.,
   4. Kim T.W.

   . 2015b. Improved runoff estimation using event-based rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Management 29(6):1995-2010.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Alvarenga C.C.,
   2. Mello C.R.,
   3. Mello J.M.,
   4. Silva A.M.,
   5. Curi N.

   . 2012. Índice de qualidade do solo associado à recarga de água subterrânea (IQS RA) na bacia hidrográfica do alto Rio grande, MG. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 36:1608-1619 (In Portuguese with Abstract in English).

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Aquino R.F.,
   2. Silva M.N.L.,
   3. Freitas D.A.F.,
   4. Curi N.,
   5. Mello C.R.,
   6. Avanzi J.C.

   . 2012. Spatial variability of the rainfall erosivity in southern region of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 36(5):533-542, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542012000500006.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Back A.J.

   2011. Time distribution of heavy rainfall events in Urussanga, Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 33(4):583-588.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Baltas E.A.,
   2. Dervos N.A.,
   3. Mimikou M.A.

   . 2007. Technical note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece. Hydrology Earth System Science 11(6):1825-1829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1825-2007.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Beskow S.,
    2. Mello C.R.,
    3. Coelho G.,
    4. Silva A.M.,
    5. Viola M.R.

    . 2009. Estimativa do escoamento superficial em uma bacia hidrográfica com base em modelagem dinâmica e distribuída. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Solo 33(1):46-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000100018.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Beskow S.,
    2. Mello C.R.,
    3. Norton L.D.,
    4. Silva A.M.

    . 2011. Performance of a distributed semi-conceptual hydrological model under tropical watershed conditions. Catena 86(3):160-171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.03.010.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
12. 1. Beskow S.,
    2. Norton L.D.,
    3. Mello C.R.

    . 2013. Hydrological prediction in a tropical watershed dominated by oxisols using a distributed hydrological model. Water Resources Management 27(2):341-363.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
13. 1. Bonta J.V.

    2015. Curve number method response to historical climate variability and trends. Transactions of the ASABE 58(2):319-334.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Chen C.L.

    1982. An evaluation of the mathematics and physical significance of the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number procedure for estimating runoff volume. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rainfall-Runoff Modeling, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, 387-418.
15. 1. D'Asaro F.,
    2. Grillone G.

    . 2012. Empirical investigation of curve number method parameters in the Mediterranean area. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17(10):1141-1152.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. D'Asaro F.,
    2. Grillone G.,
    3. Hawkins R.H.

    . 2014. Curve Number: Empirical evaluation and comparison with Curve Number handbook tables in Sicily. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 19(12):04014035.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Deshmukh D.S.,
    2. Chaube U.C.,
    3. Ekube H.A.,
    4. Aberra G.D.,
    5. Tegene K.M.

    . 2013. Estimation and comparison of curve numbers based on dynamic land use land cover change, observed rainfall-runoff data and land slope. Journal of Hydrology 492:89-101.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
18. 1. Elhakeem M.,
    2. Papanicolaou A.N.

    . 2009. Estimation of the runoff curve number via direct rainfall simulator measurements in the State of Iowa, USA. Water Resources Management 23(12):2455-2473.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Endale D.M.,
    2. Schomberg H.H.,
    3. Fisher D.S.,
    4. Jenkins M.B.

    . 2015. Curve numbers from conventional and no-till cropping: A 39-year dataset from a small Georgia piedmont watershed. Transactions of the ASABE 58(2):379-391.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Garen D.C.,
    2. Moore D.S.

    . 2005. Curve number hydrology in water quality modeling: Uses, abuses, and future directions. Journal of American Water Resources Association 41(2):377-388.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Garg V.,
    2. Nikarn B.R.,
    3. Thakur P.K.,
    4. Aggarwal S.P.

    . 2013. Assessment of the effect of slope on runoff potential of a watershed using NRCS-CN method. International Journal of Hydrological Science and Technology 3(2):141-159.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Gomes N.M.,
    2. Mello C.R.,
    3. Silva A.M.,
    4. Beskow S.

    . 2008. Aplicabilidade do LISEM (Limburg Soil Erosion Model) para simulação hidrológica em uma bacia hidrográfica tropical. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 32(6):2483-2492, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832008000600025.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Hawkins R.H.

    1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 119(2):334-345.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Hawkins R.H.,
    2. Jiang R.,
    3. Woodward D.E.,
    4. Hjelmfelt A.T.,
    5. Van Mullem J.A.

    . 2002. Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio. In Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada. Lakewood, CO: US Geological Survey.
25. 1. Hawkins R.H.,
    2. Ward T.J.,
    3. Woodward D.E.,
    4. Van Mullem J.A.

    . 2009. Curve number hydrology: State of practice. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
26. 1. Hjelmfelt A.T. Jr..,
    2. Woodward D.A.,
    3. Conaway G.,
    4. Plummer A.,
    5. Quan Q.D.,
    6. Van Mullen J.,
    7. Hawkins R.H.,
    8. Rietz D.

    . 2001. Curve numbers, recent developments. In Proceedings of the 29th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, Beijing, China (CD ROM), September 17-21, 2001.
27. 1. Huff F.A.

    1967. Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms. Water Resources Research 3(4):1007-1019.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Huizinga R.J.

    2014. An initial abstraction and constant loss model, and methods for estimating unit hydrographs, peak streamflows, and flood volumes for urban basins in Missouri. USGS Scientific Investigation 2014-5193. Reston, VA: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20145193.
29. 1. Jain M.K.,
    2. Mishra S.K.,
    3. Babu P.S.,
    4. Venugopal K.,
    5. Singh V.P.

    . 2006a. Enhanced runoff curve number model incorporating storm duration and a nonlinear Ia-S relation. Journal of Hydrological Engineering 11(6):631-635.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Jain M.K.,
    2. Mishra S.K.,
    3. Suresh B.P.,
    4. Venugopal K.

    . 2006b. On the Ia–S relation of the SCS-CN model. Nord Hydrology 37(3):261-275.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Jena S.K.,
    2. Tiwari K.N.,
    3. Pandey A.,
    4. Mishra S.K.

    . 2012. RS and geographical information system-based evaluation of distributed and composite curve number techniques. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17(11):1278-1286.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Jeon J.H.,
    2. Lim K.J.,
    3. Engel B.A.

    . 2014. Regional calibration of SCS-CN L-THIA model: Application for ungauged basins. Water 6(5):1339-1359.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Kowalik T.,
    2. Walega A.

    . 2015. Estimation of CN parameter for small agricultural watersheds using asymptotic functions. Water 7(3):939-955.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Lal M.,
    2. Mishra S.K.,
    3. Pandey A.

    . 2015. Physical verification of the effect of land features and antecedent moisture on runoff curve number. Catena 133(10):318-327.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Mello C.R.,
    2. Lima J.M.,
    3. Silva A.M.,
    4. Lopes D.

    . 2003. Abstração inicial da precipitação em microbacia hidrográfica com escoamento efêmero. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 7(3):494-500.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Mello C.R.,
    2. Norton L.D.,
    3. Pinto L.C.,
    4. Beskow S.,
    5. Curi N.

    . 2016. Agricultural watershed modeling: A review for hydrology and soil erosion processes. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 40(1):7-25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542016000100001.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Mello C.R.,
    2. Viola M.R.

    . 2013. Mapeamento de chuvas intensas no estado de Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 37(1):106-112, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832013000100004.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Miliani F.,
    2. Ravazzani G.,
    3. Mancini M.

    . 2010. Adaptation of precipitation index for the estimation of antecedent moisture condition in large mountainous basins. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 16(3):218-227.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Mishra S.K.,
    2. Jain M.K.,
    3. Singh V.P.

    . 2004. Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture. Water Resources Management 18(6):567-589.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Mishra S.K.,
    2. Sahu R.K.,
    3. Eldho T.I.,
    4. Jain M.K.

    . 2006. An improved Ia-S relation incorporating antecedent moisture in SCS-CN methodology. Water Resources Management 20:643-660.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Mishra S.K.,
    2. Singh V.P.

    . 2003. Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology ‘Kluwer’. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Academic Publishers.
42. 1. Mishra S.K.,
    2. Singh V.P.

    . 2006. A relook at NEH–4 curve number data and antecedent moisture condition criteria. Hydrological Processes 20(13):2755-2768.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Moon G.W.,
    2. Ajmal M.,
    3. Ahn J.H.,
    4. Kim T.W.

    . 2016. Investigating practical alternatives to the NRCS-CN method for direct runoff estimation using slope-adjusted curve numbers. Journal of Civil Engineering 20(7):3022-3030.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Musy A.,
    2. Hingray B.,
    3. Picouet C.

    . 2014. Hydrology: A science for engineers. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
45. 1. Nash J.E.,
    2. Sutcliffe J.V.

    . 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3):282-290.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
46. 1. Reboita M.S.,
    2. Gan M.A.,
    3. Rocha R.P.,
    4. Ambrizzi T.

    . 2010. Regimes de precipitação na América do Sul: Uma revisão bibliográfica. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia 25(2):32-39, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-77862010000200004.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Sartori A.,
    2. Lombardi N.F.,
    3. Genovez A.M.

    . 2005. Classificação hidrológica de solos brasileiros para a estimativa da chuva excedente com o método do Serviço de Conservação do Solo dos Estados Unidos Parte 1: Classificação. Revista Brasilera de Recursos Hídricos 10(4):05-18 (In Portuguese with abstract in English).

    OpenUrl
48. 1. SCS (Soil Conservation Service)

    . National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. 1956. Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
49. 1. SCS

    . National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. 1964. Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
50. 1. SCS

    . National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. 1971. Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
51. 1. SCS

    . National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. 1985. Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
52. 1. SCS

    . National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. 1993. Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
53. 1. SCS

    . National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. 2004. Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA Soil Conservation Service.
54. 1. Shi Z.H.,
    2. Chen L.D.,
    3. Fang N.F.,
    4. Qin D.F.,
    5. Cai C.F.

    . 2009. Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfall-runoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China. Catena 77(1):1-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.006.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
55. 1. Silva S.H.G.,
    2. de Menezes M.D.,
    3. Owens P.R.,
    4. Curi N.

    . 2016. Retrieving pedologist's mental model from existing soil map and comparing data mining tools for refining a larger area map under similar environmental conditions in Southeastern Brazil. Geoderma 267(1):65-77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.025.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
56. 1. Silveira L.,
    2. Charbonnier F.,
    3. Genta J.L.

    . 2000. The antecedent soil moisture condition of the curve number procedure. Hydrological Science Journal 45(1):3-12, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660009492302.

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Soil Taxonomy

    . 2014. Soil Taxonomy. In Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
58. 1. Soulis K.X.,
    2. Valiantzas J.D.

    . 2012. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds-the two-CN system approach. Hydrology Earth System Science 16(3):1001-1009.

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Soulis K.X.,
    2. Valiantzas J.D.

    . 2013. Identification of the SCS-CN parameter spatial distribution using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds. Water Resources Management 27(6):1737-1749.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Soulis K.X.,
    2. Valiantzas J.D.,
    3. Dercas N.,
    4. Londra P.A.

    . 2009. Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrology Earth System Science 13(5):605-615, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-605-2009.

    OpenUrl
61. 1. Tramblay Y.,
    2. Bouvier C.,
    3. Martin C.,
    4. Didon-Lescot J.F.,
    5. Todorovik D.,
    6. Domergue J.M.

    . 2010. Assessment of initial soil moisture conditions for event-based rainfall–runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology 387(3):176-187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.006.

    OpenUrlGeoRef
62. 1. Van Mullem J.A.,
    2. Woodward D.E.,
    3. Hawkins R.H.,
    4. Hjelmfelt A.T.,
    5. Quan Q.D.

    . 2002. Runoff curve number method: Beyond the handbook. In Proceedings of the 2nd Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI), Washington, DC.
63. 1. Walega A.,
    2. Michalec B.,
    3. Cupak A.,
    4. Grzebinoga M.

    . 2015. Comparison of SCS-CN determination methodologies in a heterogeneous catchment. Journal of Mountain Science 12(5):1084-1094.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Woodward D.E.,
    2. Jiang R.,
    3. Woodward D.E.,
    4. Hjelmfelt A.T.,
    5. VanMullem J.E.

    . 2003. Runoff curve number method: Examination of the initial abstraction ratio. In World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 23-26, 2003. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
65. 1. Yuan Y.,
    2. Wenming N.,
    3. Steven C.,
    4. Cutcheon M.,
    5. Encarnación V.

    . 2014. Initial abstraction and curve numbers for semiarid watersheds in Southeastern Arizona. Hydrological Processes 28(3):774-783.

    OpenUrl