Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Early Online
    • Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • Info For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About JSWC
    • Editorial Board
    • Call for Research Editor
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • Contact Us
  • Follow SWCS on Twitter
  • Visit SWCS on Facebook
Research ArticleResearch Section

No-tillage and noninversion tillage comparisons across wheat nitrogen rates in Alabama

K.S. Balkcom
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation November 2019, 74 (6) 560-570; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.74.6.560
K.S. Balkcom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Minimizing surface and deep tillage operations for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production may promote soil quality, but productivity and nitrogen (N) rate requirements need to be examined for these systems across Alabama Coastal Plain soils. A three-year experiment was conducted at three locations to (1) compare noninversion and no-tillage wheat production and (2) determine if N requirements across tillage systems should be modified. Each experiment (nine site-year comparisons) consisted of a split-plot design with tillage as the main plot and six fall and spring applied N fertilizer combinations as subplots, replicated four times. Tiller densities, tiller N concentrations, tiller biomass, wheat yields, grain crude protein, grain N use efficiency, and net returns were evaluated. Tillage system and fall N had no effect on tiller density or tiller N concentrations, except for 8% greater tiller N concentrations (P = 0.0842) for noninversion tillage compared to no-tillage at one location. Noninversion tillage also produced 23% more tiller biomass (P = 0.0040) compared to no-tillage at only one location. At two of the three locations, wheat yield response (P = 0.0764; P = 0.0313) varied up to 12%, but was inconsistent between tillage systems, while tillage system had no effect on grain crude protein and grain N use efficiency. The 134 kg N ha−1 rate produced 17% (P ≤ 0.0001) and 30% (P ≤ 0.0001) yield increases, averaged over tillage systems, for the 67 and 101 kg N ha−1 rates at the tillage responsive locations. No-tillage produced 11% greater net returns (P = 0.0238) than noninversion tillage for one location, while noninversion tillage produced net returns nearly six times greater (P = 0.0434) than no-tillage for the other location. Although net returns for the 101 and 134 kg N ha−1 rates were equivalent, net returns were nearly double for the 134 kg N ha−1 rate compared to the 101 kg N ha−1 rate at one location. No-tillage produced equivalent yields compared to noninversion tillage at two of the three locations, but net returns for no-tillage were only positive for one location. The 134 kg N ha−1 rate was required to maximize wheat production, but net returns indicated no advantage for additional N at the responsive locations, despite differences between N rates. No-tillage may enhance soil quality benefits, but yield increases and net returns were negligible compared to noninversion tillage across the Coastal Plain of Alabama.

  • © 2019 by the Soil and Water Conservation Society

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation: 74 (6)
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Vol. 74, Issue 6
November/December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
No-tillage and noninversion tillage comparisons across wheat nitrogen rates in Alabama
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
No-tillage and noninversion tillage comparisons across wheat nitrogen rates in Alabama
K.S. Balkcom
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2019, 74 (6) 560-570; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.74.6.560

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
No-tillage and noninversion tillage comparisons across wheat nitrogen rates in Alabama
K.S. Balkcom
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Nov 2019, 74 (6) 560-570; DOI: 10.2489/jswc.74.6.560
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Emerging nutrient management databases and networks of networks will have broad applicability in future machine learning and artificial intelligence applications in soil and water conservation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Microbial respiration gives early indication of soil health improvement following cover crops
  • Aerial interseeding and planting green to enhance nitrogen capture and cover crop biomass carbon
  • Rice producer enrollment and retention in a USDA regional conservation partnership program in the southern United States
Show more Research Section

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current Issue
  • Early Online
  • Archive
  • Subject Collections

Info For

  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers

Customer Service

  • Subscriptions
  • Permissions and Reprints
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

SWCS

  • Membership
  • Publications
  • Meetings and Events
  • Conservation Career Center

© 2023 Soil and Water Conservation Society