Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Watershed Assessment Studies sites used for the evaluation of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service proposed Soil Vulnerability Index for artificially drained cropland.
- Figure 2
Vulnerabilities to runoff, leaching, and leaching under artificial drainage as classified by the Soil Vulnerability Index (SVI) at surface drained sites: (a, d, h, k) SVI runoff component, (b, e, i, l) SVI leaching component when artificial drainage is not considered, and (c, f, j, m) SVI leaching component when artificial drainage is considered. (g) Map for the Upper Choptank watershed differentiates cropland with mineral and organic soils.
- Figure 3
Vulnerabilities to runoff, leaching, and leaching under artificial drainage as classified by the Soil Vulnerability Index (SVI) in watersheds characterized by the presence of subsurface drains: (a, d, g, j) SVI runoff component, (b, e, h, k) SVI leaching component when artificial drainage is not considered, and (c, f, i, l) SVI leaching component when artificial drainage is considered.
Tables
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Mapping the Soil Vulnerability Index across broad spatial extents to guide conservation efforts
- Purpose, development, and synthesis of the Soil Vulnerability Index for inherent vulnerability classification of cropland soils
- Assessing cultivated cropland inherent vulnerability to sediment and nutrient losses with the Soil Vulnerability Index
- Performance of the Soil Vulnerability Index with respect to slope, digital elevation model resolution, and hydrologic soil group